Elsevier

Geoforum

Volume 80, March 2017, Pages 72-81
Geoforum

Living with Volcan Tungurahua: The dynamics of vulnerability during prolonged volcanic activity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.01.006Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Interacting physical-societal dynamics have shaped the effects of volcanic activity.

  • Impacts and responses to risk have modified and evolved over time.

  • The process has been neither unidirectional in time nor uniform across space.

  • Different wellbeing trajectories have emerged for different groups.

  • Underlines the value of longitudinal/retrospective analysis of hazard impacts.

Abstract

For the people that live around many of the world’s volcanos, the effects of eruptive activity on livelihoods and wellbeing are seldom experienced as a one-off event. Not only do volcanos commonly enter long-lived phases of activity, during which the physical hazards they create alter in characteristics, but the way exposure to such hazards generates impacts on society and shapes responses by people and institutions also modifies and evolves. Within this dynamic process, the behaviour of the volcano provides a framing, but social, economic and political changes interact to shape unfolding patterns of vulnerability. The research presented in this paper explored this complexity of impact and social change for the case of Volcan Tungurahua in Ecuador, which has been in eruptive phase since 1999. Focussing on the people who live in different areas around the volcano, the study used interview and survey evidence to examine changing knowledge about eruptions and how people have experienced the effects of the volcano over time on their economic livelihoods, mobility, residence patterns, and access to services and infrastructure. Crucially, this meant recognising that the existence of a threat from hazards had societal implications, regardless of whether or not the volcano is actually in a state of high activity. These implications played out differently for different sections of the neighbouring population, with the strongest contrast emerging between the rural and urban populations, though the complexity of the case defies a simple binary comparison. The research underlines the importance of building a longitudinal element into analysis.

Keywords

Vulnerability
Livelihoods
Wellbeing
Volcano
Hazard
Resettlement

Cited by (0)