1.
Greene, J., D’Oliveira, M., ebrary, Inc: Learning to use statistical tests in psychology. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2006).
2.
Oliver, P.: The Student’s guide to research ethics. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2003).
3.
Harris, P.: Designing and reporting experiments in psychology. Open University Press, Maidenhead, England (2008).
4.
Cottrell, S.: The study skills handbook. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).
5.
Howitt, D., Cramer, D.: Introduction to research methods in psychology. Pearson, Harlow, England (2014).
6.
Wilson, S., MacLean, R.: Research methods and data analysis for psychology. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, London (2011).
7.
Penley, J.A., Tomaka, J.: Associations among the Big Five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress. Personality and Individual Differences. 32, 1215–1228 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00087-3.
8.
Bartley, C.E., Roesch, S.C.: Coping with daily stress: The role of conscientiousness. Personality and Individual Differences. 50, 79–83 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.027.
9.
Schneider, T.R., Rench, T.A., Lyons, J.B., Riffle, R.R.: The Influence of Neuroticism, Extraversion and Openness on Stress Responses. Stress and Health. 28, 102–110 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1409.
10.
Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann, W.B.: A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality. 37, 504–528 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1.
11.
Sheldon Cohen, Tom Kamarck and Robin Mermelstein: A Global Measure of Perceived Stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 24, 385–396 (1983).
12.
Schneider, T.R.: The role of neuroticism on psychological and physiological stress responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 40, 795–804 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.005.
13.
Williams, P.G., Rau, H.K., Cribbet, M.R., Gunn, H.E.: Openness to Experience and stress regulation. Journal of Research in Personality. 43, 777–784 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.06.003.
14.
MacLeod, Colin M.: Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin. 109, 163–203.
15.
Symbol processing speed differences and symbol interference effects in a variety of concept domains by SHOR, RONALD E., https://data.journalarchives.jisc.ac.uk/view?pubId=proquestpdf11281128-1971-085-00-000024pdf&terms=Shor%201971%20symbol%20processing.
16.
Stroop, J. R.: Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 18, 643–662.
17.
Basak, ChandramallikaVerhaeghen, Paul: Subitizing speed, subitizing range, counting speed, the Stroop effect, and aging: Capacity differences and speed equivalence. Psychology and Aging. 18, 240–249.
18.
Dehaene, S.: Arithmetic and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 14, 218–224 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.008.
19.
Wolach, A.H., McHale, M.A., Tarlea, A.: Numerical Stroop Effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 98, 67–77 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.98.1.67-77.
20.
Wolach, A.H., McHale, M.A., Tarlea, A.: Numerical Stroop Effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 98, 67–77 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.98.1.67-77.
21.
Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. SAGE, Los Angeles (2013).
22.
Virginia  Braun: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3, 77–101.
23.
Manzo, L.C.: Beyond house and haven: toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 23, 47–61 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00074-9.
24.
Frith, HannahGleeson, Kate: Clothing and Embodiment: Men Managing Body Image and Appearance. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 5, 40–48.