[1]
Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom: 1991. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED336049.
[2]
Agarwal, P.K. and Bain, P.M. 2019. Powerful teaching: unleash the science of learning. Jossey-Bass.
[3]
Ambrose, S.A. and Ambrose, S.A. 2010. How learning works: seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.
[4]
van Ameijde, J. et al. 2015. Designing for Student Retention The ICEBERG model and key design tips. Open University.
[5]
An update on Active Blended Learning at the University of Northampton | Alejandro Armellini: 2019. https://alejandroarmellini.wordpress.com/2019/07/17/abl-blog-post-july-2019/.
[6]
Argyris, C. Double Loop Learning in Organizations. Harvard Business Review.
[7]
Argyris, C. Reasons and Rationalizations. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
[8]
Ashwin, P. 2020. Reflective teaching in higher education. Bloomsbury Academic.
[9]
Ashwin, P. 2020. Transforming university education: a manifesto. Bloomsbury Academic.
[10]
Bale, R. 2020. Teaching with confidence in higher education: applying strategies from the performing arts. Routledge.
[11]
Barber, C.R. et al. 2020. The new roadmap for creating online courses: an interactive workbook. Cambridge University Press.
[12]
Barber, C.R. et al. 2020. The new roadmap for creating online courses: an interactive workbook. Cambridge University Press.
[13]
Barkley, E.F. et al. Engaged Teaching: A Handbook for College Faculty. SocialGood.
[14]
Beetham, H. and Sharpe, R. eds. 2020. Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: principles and practices of design. Routledge.
[15]
Biggs, J. 1996. Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education. 32, 3 (1996).
[16]
Black, J. and Moore, E.J. 2019. UDL navigators in higher education: a field guide. CAST Professional Publishing.
[17]
Blake, R.J. 2008. Brave New Digital Classroom: Technology and Foreign Language Learning. Georgetown University Press.
[18]
Bloom, B.S. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals, Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. David McKay Co.
[19]
Bloom’s Taxonomy | Center for Teaching | Vanderbilt University: https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/.
[20]
Boettcher, J.V. and Conrad, R.-M. 2016. The online teaching survival guide: simple and practical pedagogical tips. Jossey-Bass.
[21]
Boud, D. and Molloy, E. 2013. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 38, 6 (Sep. 2013), 698–712. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
[22]
Bovill, C. 2020. Co-creating learning and teaching: towards relational pedagogy in higher education. Critical Publishing.
[23]
Bransford, J. 2000. How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
[24]
Bresciani Ludvik, M.J. et al. 2016. The neuroscience of learning and development: enhancing creativity, compassion, critical thinking, and peace in higher education. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
[25]
Brookfield, S. 2017. Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Jossey-Bass.
[26]
Brown, N. and Leigh, J. 2020. Ableism in Academia: Theorising experiences of disabilities and chronic illnesses in higher education. UCL Press.
[27]
Brown, P.C. et al. 2014. Make it stick: the science of successful learning. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[28]
Brown, P.C. et al. 2014. Make it stick: the science of successful learning. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[29]
Bruff, D. 2019. Intentional tech: principles to guide the use of educational technology in college teaching. West Virginia University Press.
[30]
Burns, L. and Mahoney, C. 2013. Student engagement: identity, motivation and community. Libri Publishing.
[31]
Butler, A. et al. Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 34, 918–928.
[32]
Byrne, N. et al. 2021. An introduction to teaching in UK higher education: a guide for international and transnational teachers. Routledge.
[33]
Chamberlain, J.M. et al. 2011. Peer observation of teaching: A decoupled process. Active Learning in Higher Education. 12, 3 (Nov. 2011), 189–201. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411415083.
[34]
Chickering, A.W. and Gamson, Z.F. 1987. Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin.
[35]
Classroom Assessment Techniques. A Handbook for Faculty.: 1988. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED317097.
[36]
Cook-Sather, A. et al. 2014. Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: a guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.
[37]
Costello, P.J.M. and Costello, J. 2011. Effective action research: developing reflective thinking and practice. Continuum.
[38]
Creswell, J.W. 2014. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
[39]
Creswell, J.W. and Guetterman, T.C. 2021. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education Limited.
[40]
Dawson, P. 2021. Defending assessment security in a digital world: preventing e-cheating and supporting academic integrity in higher education. Routledge.
[41]
Dawson, P. et al. 2019. What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 44, 1 (Jan. 2019), 25–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877.
[42]
Deslauriers, L. et al. 2019. Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116, 39 (Sep. 2019), 19251–19257. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116.
[43]
Disrupting traditional pedagogy: active learning in practice: 2019. https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/vm40xt05h.
[44]
Drumm, L. 2019. Folk pedagogies and pseudo-theories: how lecturers rationalise their digital teaching. Research in Learning Technology. 27, (2019). DOI:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2094.
[45]
Dunlosky, J. et al. 2013. Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 14, 1 (Jan. 2013), 4–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266.
[46]
Dweck, C.S. 2017. Mindset. Robinson.
[47]
Felten, P. and Lambert, L.M. 2020. Relationship-rich education: how human connections drive success in college. Johns Hopkins University Press.
[48]
Ghaye, T. 2010. Teaching and Learning through Reflective Practice: A Practical Guide for Positive Action. Taylor and Francis.
[49]
Ghaye, T. 2011. Teaching and learning through reflective practice: a practical guide for positive action. Routledge.
[50]
Guccione, K. and Hutchinson, S. 2021. Coaching and mentoring for academic development. Emerald Publishing.
[51]
Hartley, P. et al. 2022. Success in groupwork. Bloomsbury Academic.
[52]
Hattie, J. 2012. Visible learning for teachers: maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
[53]
Hattie, J. 2012. Visible learning for teachers: maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
[54]
Hattie, J. and Zierer, K. 2018. 10 mindframes for visible learning: teaching for success. Routledge.
[55]
Hattie, J. and Zierer, K. 2018. 10 mindframes for visible learning: teaching for success. Routledge.
[56]
Horvath, J.C. 2019. Stop talking, start influencing: 12 insights from brain science to make your message stick. EXISLE PUB.
[57]
Innovations in Active Learning in Higher Education: 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/fulcrum.1v53k041v.
[58]
International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2013. Teaching & learning inquiry. (2013).
[59]
Jones, K. 2019. Retrieval practice: research and resources for every classroom. John Catt Educational Ltd.
[60]
Just-In-Time Teaching Guide: 2020. https://cee.ucdavis.edu/jitt.
[61]
Kahn, P. and Anderson, L. 2019. Developing your teaching: towards excellence. Routledge.
[62]
Karpicke, J.D. and Blunt, J.R. 2011. Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science. 331, 6018 (2011).
[63]
Kay Sambell and Sally Brown: Covid-19 Assessment Collection - Sally Brown Sally Brown: https://sally-brown.net/kay-sambell-and-sally-brown-covid-19-assessment-collection/.
[64]
King, H. 2022. Developing Expertise for Teaching in Higher Education: Practical Ideas for Professional Learning and Development. Taylor & Francis Group.
[65]
Kirschner, P.A. et al. 2020. How learning happens: seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. Routledge.
[66]
Kneebone, R. 2020. Expert: understanding the path to mastery. Viking.
[67]
Kornell, N. 2009. Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 23, 9 (Dec. 2009), 1297–1317. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1537.
[68]
Krathwohl, D.R. 2002. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice. 41, 4 (2002).
[69]
Lambert, S.R. 2019. Six critical dimensions: A model for widening participation in open, online and blended programs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 35, 6 (Dec. 2019), 161–182. DOI:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5683.
[70]
Lang, J.M. 2016. Small Teaching: Everyday Lessons from the Science of Learning. Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer.
[71]
Laurillard, D. 2002. Rethinking university teaching: a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. RoutledgeFalmer.
[72]
Laurillard, D. 2012. Teaching as a design science: building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
[73]
Lowe, T. and El Hakim, Y. eds. 2020. A handbook for student engagement in higher education: theory into practice. Routledge.
[74]
Lowe, T. and El Hakim, Y. eds. 2020. A handbook for student engagement in higher education: theory into practice. Routledge.
[75]
Luckin, R. ed. 2018. Enhancing learning and teaching with technology: what the research says. UCL Institute of Education Press.
[76]
Major, C.H. 2015. Teaching Online: A Guide to Theory, Research, and Practice. Johns Hopkins University Press.
[77]
Manalo, E. 2019. Deeper Learning, Dialogic Learning, and Critical Thinking: Research-Based Strategies for the Classroom. Routledge.
[78]
Marshall, S. ed. 2020. A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: enhancing academic practice. Routledge.
[79]
McConlogue, T. Assessment and feedback in higher education: a guide for teachers. UCL Press.
[80]
McConlogue, T. Assessment and feedback in higher education: a guide for teachers. UCL Press.
[81]
McNiff, J. 2013. Action research: principles and practice. Routledge.
[82]
McNiff, J. 2013. Action research: principles and practice. Routledge.
[83]
McTighe, J. and Wiggins, G.P. 2013. Essential questions: opening doors to student understanding. ASCD.
[84]
McTighe, J. and Willis, J. 2019. Upgrade your teaching: understanding by design meets neuroscience. ASCD.
[85]
Meyer, K.A. 2014. Student engagement online: what works and why. John Wiley & Sons.
[86]
Middendorf, J.K. et al. 2018. Overcoming student learning bottlenecks: decode the critical thinking of your discipline. Stylus Publishing.
[87]
Models of reflection - Reflective Practice Toolkit - LibGuides at University of Cambridge Subject Libraries: 2020. https://libguides.cam.ac.uk/reflectivepracticetoolkit/models.
[88]
Moon, J.A. 2006. Learning journals: a handbook for reflective practice and professional development. Routledge.
[89]
Moon, J.A. 2008. Reflection in learning & professional development: theory & practice. RoutledgeFalmer.
[90]
Moon, J.A. 2008. Reflection in learning & professional development: theory & practice. RoutledgeFalmer.
[91]
Mortiboys, A. 2010. How to be an effective teacher in higher education: answers to lecturers’ questions. Open University Press.
[92]
Nelson, L.L. and Rose, D.H. 2014. Design and deliver: planning and teaching using universal design for learning. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
[93]
Nicol, D.J. and Macfarlane‐Dick, D. 2006. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education. 31, 2 (Apr. 2006), 199–218. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090.
[94]
Noffke, S.E. and Somekh, B. 2009. The SAGE handbook of educational action research. SAGE.
[95]
Norton, L. 2019. Action research in teaching & learning: a practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[96]
Pecorari, D. and Shaw, P. eds. 2018. Student plagiarism in higher education: reflections on teaching practice. Routledge.
[97]
Penn, P. 2020. The psychology of effective studying: how to succeed in your degree. Routledge.
[98]
POKORNY., H. 2021. ENHANCING TEACHING PRACTICE IN HIGHER EDUCATION. SAGE PUBLICATIONS.
[99]
Pokorny, H. and Warren, D. eds. 2016. Enhancing teaching practice in higher education. SAGE.
[100]
Race, P. 2020. The lecturer’s toolkit: a practical guide to assessment, learning and teaching. Routledge.
[101]
Race, P. 2007. The lecturer’s toolkit: a practical guide to assessment, learning and teaching. Kogan Page.
[102]
Ramsden, P. 2003. Learning to teach in higher education. RoutledgeFalmer.
[103]
Rawson, K.A. et al. 2013. The Power of Successive Relearning: Improving Performance on Course Exams and Long-Term Retention. Educational Psychology Review. 25, 4 (Dec. 2013), 523–548. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9240-4.
[104]
Rawson, K.A. and Dunlosky, J. 2007. Improving students’ self-evaluation of learning for key concepts in textbook materials. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 19, 4–5 (Jul. 2007), 559–579. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326022.
[105]
Redmond, P. et al. 2018. An Online Engagement Framework for Higher Education. Online Learning. 22, 1 (Mar. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175.
[106]
Reynolds, H.L. and Kearns, K.D. 2017. A Planning Tool for Incorporating Backward Design, Active Learning, and Authentic Assessment in the College Classroom. College Teaching. 65, 1 (Jan. 2017), 17–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2016.1222575.
[107]
Sambell, K. 2020. "We need to change what we’re doing.” Using pedagogic action research to improve teacher management of exemplars. Practitioner Research in Higher Education. 13, 1 (2020), 3–17.
[108]
Schön, D.A. 1987. Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
[109]
Schon, D.A. 2016. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Routledge.
[110]
Schön, D.A. 1991. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Arena, Ashgate.
[111]
Simonson, S.R. ed. 2019. POGIL: an introduction to process oriented guided inquiry learning for those who wish to empower learners. Stylus Publishing LLC.
[112]
Simonson, S.R. ed. 2019. POGIL: an introduction to process oriented guided inquiry learning for those who wish to empower learners. Stylus Publishing LLC.
[113]
Talbert, R. 2017. Flipped learning: a guide for higher education faculty. Stylus Publishing.
[114]
The Asynchronous Cookbook: recipes for engaged & active online learning: 2021. https://pressbooks.middcreate.net/asynchronouscookbook/.
[115]
Tong, V.C.H. et al. 2018. Shaping Higher Education with Students: Ways to Connect Research and Teaching. UCL Press.
[116]
Universal Design for Learning: The UDL Guidelines: http://udlguidelines.cast.org/?utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=none&utm_source=cast-about-udl.
[117]
Villarroel, V. et al. 2018. Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 43, 5 (Jul. 2018), 840–854. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396.
[118]
Weller, S. 2019. Academic practice: developing as a professional in higher education. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[119]
Wiggins, G.P. and McTighe, J. 2011. The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units. ASCD.
[120]
Wiliam, D. 2011. What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation. 37, 1 (Mar. 2011), 3–14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001.
[121]
Winstone, N. and Carless, D. 2019. Designing Effective Feedback Processes in Higher Education: A Learning-Focused Approach. Taylor & Francis Inc.
[122]
Winstone, N.E. and Boud, D. 2020. The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. (Jun. 2020), 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687.
[123]
Winstone, N.E. and Carless, D. 2020. Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: a learning-focused approach. Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.
[124]
Wisker, G. 2012. The good supervisor: supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[125]
Wisker, G. 2012. The good supervisor: supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[126]
Wissman, K.T. et al. 2011. The interim test effect: Testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 18, 6 (Dec. 2011), 1140–1147. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0140-7.
[127]
Developing Academic Practice.
[128]
Educational Action Research.
[129]
Educational psychology review.
[130]
International Journal for Students as Partners.
[131]
Practitioner Research in Higher Education.
[132]
Research in Learning Technology.