[1]
Abrahamsen, R. 2007. Postcolonialism. International relations theory for the twenty-first century: an introduction. Routledge.
[2]
Adam Jones 1996. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 22, 4 (1996), 405–429.
[3]
Adler, E. and Barnett, M.N. 1998. Security communities. Cambridge University Press.
[4]
Alan James 1989. The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 15, 3 (1989), 215–229.
[5]
Alderson, K. et al. 2000. Hedley Bull on international society. Macmillan.
[6]
Alexander Wendt 1992. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 46, 2 (1992), 391–425.
[7]
Alexander Wendt 1992. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 46, 2 (1992), 391–425.
[8]
Alexander Wendt 1995. Constructing International Politics. International Security. 20, 1 (1995), 71–81.
[9]
Alexander Wendt 1995. Constructing International Politics. International Security. 20, 1 (1995), 71–81.
[10]
Alexander Wendt 1995. Constructing International Politics. International Security. 20, 1 (1995), 71–81.
[11]
Andreas Osiander 1998. Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited. International Studies Quarterly. 42, 3 (1998), 409–432.
[12]
Andreas Osiander 1998. Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited. International Studies Quarterly. 42, 3 (1998), 409–432.
[13]
Anievas, A. 2010. Marxism and world politics: contesting global capitalism. Routledge.
[14]
Antonio Franceschet 2001. Sovereignty and Freedom: Immanuel Kant’s Liberal Internationalist ‘Legacy’. Review of International Studies. 27, 2 (2001), 209–228.
[15]
ARCHIBUGI, D. 1995. Immanuel Kant, Cosmopolitan Law and Peace. European Journal of International Relations. 1, 4 (Dec. 1995), 429–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066195001004002.
[16]
Archibugi, D. and Held, D. 1995. Cosmopolitan democracy: an agenda for a new world order. Polity Press.
[17]
Aron, R. et al. 1985. History, truth, liberty: selected writings of Raymond Aron. University of Chicago Press.
[18]
Ashley, R.K. 1988. Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 17, 2 (June 1988), 227–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020901.
[19]
Audie Klotz 1995. Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions Against South Africa. International Organization. 49, 3 (1995), 451–478.
[20]
Bain, W. 2003. Between anarchy and society: trusteeship and the obligations of power. Oxford University Press.
[21]
BAIN, WILLIAM 2000. Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered. Review of International Studies. 26, 03 (2000), 445–464.
[22]
BAIN, WILLIAM 2000. Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered. Review of International Studies. 26, 03 (2000), 445–464.
[23]
Baldwin, D.A. 1993. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. Columbia University Press.
[24]
Barkawi, T. 2001. War inside the free world. Democracy, liberalism, and war: rethinking the democratic peace debate. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[25]
Barry Buzan 1993. From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School. International Organization. 47, 3 (1993), 327–352.
[26]
Bartelson, J. 1995. A genealogy of sovereignty. Cambridge University Press.
[27]
Beitz, C.R. 1999. Social and Cosmopolitan Liberalism. International Affairs. 75, 3 (July 1999), 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00091.
[28]
Beitz, C.R. and NetLibrary, Inc 1999. Political theory and international relations. Princeton University Press.
[29]
Bellamy, A.J. 2005. International society and its critics. Oxford University Press.
[30]
Bidet, J. and Kouvélakis, E. 2009. Critical companion to contemporary Marxism. Haymarket Books.
[31]
Biersteker, T.J. and Weber, C. 1996. State sovereignty as social construct. Cambridge University Press.
[32]
Bilgin, P. 2010. Looking for ‘the International’ beyond the West. Third World Quarterly. 31, 5 (July 2010), 817–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2010.502696.
[33]
Bilgin, P. 2008. Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly. 29, 1 (Feb. 2008), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701726392.
[34]
Bilgin, P. 2008. Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly. 29, 1 (Feb. 2008), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701726392.
[35]
Biswas, S. 2007. Empire and Global Public Intellectuals: Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 36, 1 (Dec. 2007), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298070360010801.
[36]
Biswas, S. 2013. Postcolonialism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[37]
Booth, K. et al. 2001. How might we live?: global ethics in a new century. Cambridge University Press.
[38]
Booth, K. 2011. Realism and world politics. Routledge.
[39]
Booth, K. et al. 1998. The eighty years’ crisis: international relations 1919-1999. Cambridge University Press.
[40]
Booth, K. 1999. Three tyrannies. Human rights in global politics. Cambridge University Press.
[41]
Booth, K. and Dunne, T. 2002. Worlds in collision: terror and the future of global order. Palgrave.
[42]
Booth, K. and Smith, S. 1995. International relations theory today. Polity Press.
[43]
Booth, K. and Smith, S. 1995. International relations theory today. Polity Press.
[44]
Brassett, J. and Bulley, D. 2007. Ethics in World Politics: Cosmopolitanism and Beyond? International Politics. 44, 1 (Jan. 2007), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800155.
[45]
Brown, C. and Ainley, K. 2009. Understanding international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[46]
Bull, H. 1995. Chapter 8: The Theory of International Politics. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[47]
Bull, H. et al. 2000. Hedley Bull on international society. Macmillan Press.
[48]
Bull, H. et al. 1990. Hugo Grotius and international relations. Clarendon.
[49]
Bull, H. 2000. Justice in international relations, Hagey lectures. Hedley Bull on international society. Macmillan.
[50]
Bull, H. 1995. Society and anarchy in international relations. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[51]
Bull, H. 1995. Society and Anarchy in International Relations. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[52]
Bull, H. 2012. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[53]
Bull, H. and Watson, A. 1984. The Expansion of international society. Clarendon.
[54]
Burchill, S. 2009. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[55]
Butterfield, H. 2019. Diplomatic investigations. Oxford University Press.
[56]
Buzan, B. et al. 1993. The logic of anarchy: neorealism to structural realism. Columbia University Press.
[57]
Buzan, B. 1996. The timeless wisdom of realism? International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[58]
Buzan, B. 1996. Timeless Wisdom of Realism? International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[59]
Buzan, B. and ebrary, Inc 2004. From international to world society?: English school theory and the social structure of globalisation. Cambridge University Press.
[60]
Callinicos, A. Actuality of imperialism. Millennium 31 (2) 2002.
[61]
Campbell, D. 2013. Poststructuralism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[62]
Campbell, D. 2013. Poststructuralism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[63]
Campbell, D. and ebrary, Inc 1998. National deconstruction: violence, identity, and justice in Bosnia. University of Minnesota Press.
[64]
Campbell, D. and ebrary, Inc 1998. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. University of Minnesota Press.
[65]
Campbell, D. and Shapiro, M.J. 1999. Moral spaces: rethinking ethics and world politics. University of Minnesota Press.
[66]
Caney, S. 2005. Justice beyond borders: a global political theory. Oxford University Press.
[67]
Carlsnaes, W. et al. 2002. Handbook of international relations. SAGE.
[68]
Carlsnaes, W. et al. 2002. Handbook of international relations. SAGE.
[69]
Carr, E.H. 1942. Conditions of peace. Macmillan.
[70]
Carr, E.H. and Cox, M. 2001. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Palgrave.
[71]
Carr, E.H. and Cox, M. 2001. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Palgrave.
[72]
CARVER, TERRELL; COCHRAN, MOLLY; SQUIRES, JUDITH 2000. Gendering Jones: feminisms, IRs, masculinities. Review of International Studies. 24, 02 (2000), 283–297.
[73]
CAVALLAR, G. 2001. Kantian perspectives on democratic peace: alternatives to Doyle. Review of International Studies. 27, 02 (Apr. 2001). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500002291.
[74]
Chowdhry, G. and Nair, S. 2004. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class. Routledge.
[75]
Chris Brown 1995. International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way? Review of International Studies. 21, 2 (1995), 183–196.
[76]
Chris Brown 2005. The House That Chuck Built: Twenty-Five Years of Reading Charles Beitz. Review of International Studies. 31, 2 (2005), 371–379.
[77]
Clark, I. 1999. Globalization and international relations theory. Oxford University Press.
[78]
Clark, I. 2005. Legitimacy in international society. Oxford University Press.
[79]
Clinton, W.D. and ebrary, Inc 2007. The realist tradition and contemporary international relations. Louisiana State University Press.
[80]
Clinton, W.D. and ebrary, Inc 2007. The realist tradition and contemporary international relations. Louisiana State University Press.
[81]
Collin, F. 1985. Theory and understanding: a critique of interpretive social science. Blackwell.
[82]
Collingwood, R.G. 1961. The idea of history. Oxford University Press.
[83]
Copeland, D. 2003. A Realist critique of the English School. Review of International Studies. 29, 03 (July 2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004273.
[84]
Cox, M. et al. 2000. American democracy promotion: impulses, strategies, and impacts. Oxford University Press.
[85]
Cox, M. et al. 2001. Empires, systems and states: great transformations in international politics. Cambridge University Press.
[86]
Cox, M. et al. 1999. The interregnum: controversies in world politics 1989-1999. New York.
[87]
Cox, R. 1986. Social Forces, States and World Orders. Neorealism and its critics. Columbia University Press.
[88]
Cox, R. 2008. The point is not just to explain the world but to change it. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press.
[89]
Cox, R. 2008. The point is not just to explain the World but to change It. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press.
[90]
Cox, R.W. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 10, 2 (June 1981), 126–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501.
[91]
COZETTE, M. 2008. Reclaiming the critical dimension of realism: Hans J. Morgenthau on the ethics of scholarship. Review of International Studies. 34, 01 (Jan. 2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210508007882.
[92]
Craig, C. 2007. Glimmer of a new Leviathan: total war in the realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. Columbia University Press.
[93]
Craig, C. 2007. Glimmer of a new Leviathan: total war in the realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. Columbia University Press.
[94]
D. J. Markwell 1986. Sir Alfred Zimmern Revisited: Fifty Years On. Review of International Studies. 12, 4 (1986), 279–292.
[95]
Darby, P. 2000. At the edge of international relations: postcolonialism, gender and dependency. Continuum.
[96]
Davenport, A. 2013. Marxism in IR: Condemned to a Realist fate? European Journal of International Relations. 19, 1 (Mar. 2013), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111416021.
[97]
David L. Blaney and Naeem Inayatullah 2000. The Westphalian Deferral. International Studies Review. 2, 2 (2000), 29–64.
[98]
David Long 1991. J. A. Hobson and Idealism in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 17, 3 (1991), 285–304.
[99]
Dean, M. 1994. Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. Routledge.
[100]
Der Derian, J. 1995. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[101]
Der Derian, J. 1995. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[102]
Der Derian, J. 1995. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[103]
Donnelly, J. 2009. Realism. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[104]
Donnelly, J. 2009. Realism. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[105]
Donnelly, J. 1992. Twentieth century realism. Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge University Press.
[106]
Donnelly, J. and ebrary, Inc 2000. Realism and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[107]
Donnelly, J. and ebrary, Inc 2000. Realism and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[108]
Doty, R.L. and ebrary, Inc 1996. Imperial encounters: the politics of representation in North-South relations. University of Minnesota Press.
[109]
Doyle, M.W. 1997. Ways of war and peace: realism, liberalism, and socialism. Norton.
[110]
Doyle, M.W. and Ikenberry, G.J. 1997. New thinking in international relations theory. Westview Press.
[111]
Dunne, T. 2013. Chapter 7. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[112]
Dunne, T. 2013. English School. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[113]
Dunne, T. et al. eds 2016. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[114]
DUNNE, T. 1995. International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled? Cooperation and Conflict. 30, 2 (June 1995), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836795030002002.
[115]
Dunne, T. 1998. Inventing international society: a history of the English school. Macmillan Press Ltd.
[116]
Dunne, T. et al. 2013. The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations. 19, 3 (Sept. 2013), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485.
[117]
Dunne, T. et al. 2013. The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations. 19, 3 (Sept. 2013), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485.
[118]
Edkins, J. 2005. Ethics and Practices of Engagement: Intellectuals as Experts. International Relations. 19, 1 (Mar. 2005), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805050062.
[119]
Edkins, J. 1996. Legality with a Vengeance: Famines and Humanitarian Relief in ‘Complex Emergencies’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 25, 3 (Dec. 1996), 547–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298960250030501.
[120]
Edkins, J. 2007. Poststructuralism. International relations theory for the twenty-first century: an introduction. Routledge.
[121]
Edkins, J. 2023. Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[122]
Edkins, J. 2003. Trauma and the memory of politics. Cambridge University Press.
[123]
Edkins, J. and Pin-Fat, V. 2005. Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 34, 1 (Aug. 2005), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050340010101.
[124]
Edkins, J. and Vaughan-Williams, N. 2009. Critical theorists and international relations. Routledge.
[125]
EDKINS, J. and ZEHFUSS, M. 2005. Generalising the international. Review of International Studies. 31, 03 (July 2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006583.
[126]
Edkins, J. and Zehfuss, M. 2014. Global politics: a new introduction. Routledge.
[127]
Edkins, J. and Zehfuss, M. 2014. Global politics: a new introduction. Routledge.
[128]
Edkins, J. and Zehfuss, M. 2014. Global politics: a new introduction. Routledge.
[129]
Ehlstain, J.B. 1995. International Politics and Political Theory. International relations theory today. Polity Press.
[130]
Elman, C. and Elman, M.F. 2001. Bridges and boundaries: historians, political scientists, and the study of international relations. MIT Press.
[131]
Enloe, C.H. Bananas, beaches & bases: making feminist sense of international politics.
[132]
Enloe, C.H. 1993. The morning after: sexual politics at the end of the Cold War. University of California Press.
[133]
Erskine, T. 2013. Normative Theory. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[134]
Escobar, A. and ebrary, Inc 1995. Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
[135]
Ferguson, J. 1994. The anti-politics machine: ‘development,’ depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. University of Minnesota Press.
[136]
Ferguson, Y.H. 2015. Diversity in IR Theory: Pluralism as an Opportunity for Understanding Global Politics. International Studies Perspectives. 16, 1 (Feb. 2015), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12092.
[137]
Fierke, K. 2013. Constructivism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[138]
Fierke, K. 2013. Constructivism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[139]
Friedrich Kratochwil 1993. The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik without Politics. Review of International Studies. 19, 1 (1993), 63–80.
[140]
Frost, M. and Frost, M. 1996. Ethics in international relations: a constitutive theory. Cambridge University Press.
[141]
Fukuyama, F. 2020. The end of history and the last man. Penguin Books.
[142]
George, J. 1994. ch 5. Discourses of global politics: a critical (re)introduction to international relations. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[143]
George, J. 1994. Discourses of global politics: a critical (re)introduction to international relations. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[144]
George, J. 1995. Realist ‘Ethics’, International Relations, and Post-modernism: Thinking Beyond the Egoism-Anarchy Thematic. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 24, 2 (July 1995), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298950240020301.
[145]
Gill, S. 1993. Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[146]
Gill, S. 1998. New constitutionalism, democratisation and global political economy∗. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change. 10, 1 (Feb. 1998), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781159808412845.
[147]
Gill, S. 1998. New constitutionalism, democratisation and global political economy∗. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change. 10, 1 (Feb. 1998), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781159808412845.
[148]
Gilpin, R. 1986. The richness of the tradition of political realism. Neorealism and its critics. Columbia University Press.
[149]
Grovogui, S. 2013. Postcolonialism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[150]
Grovogui, S.N. 1996. Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans: race and self-determination in international law. University of Minnesota Press.
[151]
Guzzini, S. and Leander, A. 2006. Constructivism and international relations: Alexander Wendt and his critics. Routledge.
[152]
Guzzini, S. and Leander, A. 2006. Constructivism and international relations: Alexander Wendt and his critics. Routledge.
[153]
Halliday, F. 1994. Chapter 1. Rethinking international relations. Macmillan.
[154]
Halliday, F. 1996. Chapter 11: The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[155]
Halliday, F. 1994. International society as homogeneity. Rethinking international relations. Macmillan.
[156]
Halliday, F. 1994. Rethinking international relations. Macmillan.
[157]
Halliday, F. 1994. Rethinking international relations. Macmillan.
[158]
Halliday, F. 1994. Rethinking international relations. Macmillan.
[159]
HALLIDAY, FRED; ROSENBERG, JUSTIN 2000. Interview with Ken Waltz CONDUCTED BY FRED HALLIDAY AND JUSTIN ROSENBERG. Review of International Studies. 24, 03 (2000), 371–386.
[160]
Hardt, M. and Negri, A. 2001. Empire. Harvard University Press.
[161]
Hardt, M. and Negri, A. 2006. Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire. Penguin.
[162]
Haslam, J. 2002. No virtue like necessity: realist thought in international relations since Machiavelli. Yale University Press.
[163]
Hobson, J.M. and ebrary, Inc 2000. The state and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[164]
Hoffman, M. 1987. Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 16, 2 (June 1987), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298870160022801.
[165]
Hoffman, M. 1991. Restructuring, Reconstruction, . Reinscription, Rearticulation: Four Voices in Critical International Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 20, 2 (Dec. 1991), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298910200021001.
[166]
Hollis, M. 1994. The philosophy of social science: an introduction. Cambridge University Press.
[167]
Hollis, M. and Smith, S. 1990. Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon Press.
[168]
Holsti, K. The study of International Relations During the Cold War. Review of International Studies.
[169]
Holsti, K.J. 1985. The dividing discipline: hegemony and diversity in international theory. Allen & Unwin.
[170]
Hurrell, A. 2002. Chapter ‘Norms and Ethics in International relations’ in Handbook of international relations. Handbook of international relations. SAGE.
[171]
Hutchings, K. 2010. Global ethics: an introduction. Polity.
[172]
HUTCHINGS, K. 2007. Happy Anniversary! Time and critique in International Relations theory. Review of International Studies. 33, S1 (Apr. 2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007401.
[173]
Hutchings, K. and ebrary, Inc 1996. Kant, critique and politics. Routledge.
[174]
Huysmans, J. 2004. Minding Exceptions: The Politics of Insecurity and Liberal Democracy. Contemporary Political Theory. 3, 3 (Dec. 2004), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300137.
[175]
J. Ann Tickner 1997. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 41, 4 (1997), 611–632.
[176]
Jackson, P.T. 2011. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Routledge.
[177]
Jackson, R. 1996. Is there a classical international theory? International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[178]
Jackson, R.H. 1990. Martin Wight, International Theory and the Good Life. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 19, 2 (June 1990), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190020901.
[179]
Jackson, R.H. 2000. The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states. Oxford University Press.
[180]
Jahn, B. 1998. One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 27, 3 (Sept. 1998), 613–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270030201.
[181]
John Gerard Ruggie 1998. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization. 52, 4 (1998), 855–885.
[182]
John Lewis Gaddis 1993. International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War. International Security. 17, 3 (1993), 5–58.
[183]
John M. Hobson 1998. The Historical Sociology of the State and the State of Historical Sociology in International Relations. Review of International Political Economy. 5, 2 (1998), 284–320.
[184]
John Macmillan 1996. Democracies Don’t Fight: A Case of the Wrong Research Agenda? Review of International Studies. 22, 3 (1996), 275–299.
[185]
Jones, R.W. 2001. Locating Critical in Critical international Relations Theory. Critical theory and world politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[186]
Joseph M. Grieco 1988. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization. 42, 3 (1988), 485–507.
[187]
Kahler, M. 1997. Inventing International Relations. New thinking in international relations theory. Westview Press.
[188]
Kant, I. 1991. Perpetual peace. Kant: political writings. Cambridge University Press.
[189]
Kate Manzo 1997. Critical Humanism: Postcolonialism and Postmodern Ethics. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 22, 3 (1997), 381–408.
[190]
Katzenstein, P.J. 1998. Cultural norms and national security: police and military in postwar Japan. Cornell University Press.
[191]
Katzenstein, P.J. et al. 1999. Exploration and contestation in the study of world politics. MIT Press.
[192]
Kauppi, M.V. and Viotti, P.R. 2020. Chapter 1. International relations theory. Rowman & Littlefield.
[193]
Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. 1998. Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.
[194]
Kegley, C.W. 1995. Controversies in international relations theory: realism and the neoliberal challenge. St. Martin’s Press.
[195]
Ken Booth 1997. Discussion: A Reply to Wallace. Review of International Studies. 23, 3 (1997), 371–377.
[196]
Ken Booth 1995. Human Wrongs and International Relations. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 71, 1 (1995), 103–126.
[197]
Ken Booth 1991. Security and Emancipation. Review of International Studies. 17, 4 (1991), 313–326.
[198]
Kennan, G.F. 1952. American diplomacy, 1900-1950. Secker & Warburg.
[199]
Kenneth N. Waltz 2000. Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security. 25, 1 (2000), 5–41.
[200]
Keohane, R.O. 1998. Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory. International Studies Quarterly. 42, 1 (Mar. 1998), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00076.
[201]
Keohane, R.O. 1989. International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 18, 2 (June 1989), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298890180021001.
[202]
Keohane, R.O. 1986. Neorealism and its critics. Columbia University Press.
[203]
Keohane, R.O. 1986. Neorealism and its critics. Columbia University Press.
[204]
Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J.S. 1989. Power and interdependence. Scott, Foresman.
[205]
Knutsen, T.L. 1997. A history of international relations theory. Manchester University Press.
[206]
Krishna, S. Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century. Rowman & Littlefield.
[207]
Krishna, S. Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century. Rowman & Littlefield.
[208]
Kubálková, V. et al. 1998. International relations in a constructed world. M.E. Sharpe.
[209]
Kubálková, V. and Cruickshank, A.A. 1980. Marxism-Leninism and theory of international relations. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[210]
Kurki, M. 2011. The Limitations of the Critical Edge: Reflections on Critical and Philosophical IR Scholarship Today. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 40, 1 (Sept. 2011), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811411997.
[211]
Kurki, M. 2011. The Limitations of the Critical Edge: Reflections on Critical and Philosophical IR Scholarship Today. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 40, 1 (Sept. 2011), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811411997.
[212]
Kurki, M. and Wight, C. 2013. Chapter 1 of International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[213]
Kurki, M. and Wight, C. 2013. International Relations as a Social Science. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[214]
Lebow, N. 2013. Classical Realism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[215]
Lebow, N. 2013. Classical Realism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[216]
Lebow, R.N. 2008. A cultural theory of international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[217]
Lebow, R.N. 2003. The Tragic vision of politics: ethics, interests, and orders. Cambridge University Press.
[218]
Lebow, R.N. and Risse-Kappen, T. 1995. International relations theory and the end of the Cold War. Columbia University Press.
[219]
Ling, L.H.M. 2002. Postcolonial international relations: conquest and desire between Asia and the West. Palgrave.
[220]
Linklater, A. 1996. Achievements of Critical Theory. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[221]
Linklater, A. 1990. Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations. Macmillan.
[222]
Linklater, A. 2007. Critical theory and world politics: citizenship, sovereignty and humanity. Routledge.
[223]
Linklater, A. 2000. International relations: critical concepts in political science. Routledge.
[224]
Linklater, A. 2009. Marx and Marxism. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[225]
Linklater, A. 1995. Neorealism in theory and practice. International relations theory today. Polity Press.
[226]
Linklater, A. 2009. The English School. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[227]
Linklater, A. 1999. The Evolving Spheres of International Justice. International Affairs. 75, 3 (July 1999), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00088.
[228]
Linklater, A. 1998. The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the post-Westphalian era. Polity.
[229]
Linklater, A. and London School of Economics and Political Science 1990. Men and citizens in the theory of international relations. Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics and Political Science.
[230]
Linklater, A. and Suganami, H. 2006. The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment. Cambridge University Press.
[231]
Little, R. 1996. Growing Relevance of Pluralism. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[232]
Long, D. 1995. The Harvard School of Liberal International Theory: A Case for Closure. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 24, 3 (Dec. 1995), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298950240031201.
[233]
Long, D. et al. 1995. Thinkers of The twenty years’ crisis: inter-war idealism reassessed. Clarendon Press.
[234]
Long, D. and Wilson, P. 1995. Thinkers of The twenty years’ crisis: inter-war idealism reassessed. Clarendon Press.
[235]
Loomba, A. 2005. Colonialism - postcolonialism. Routledge.
[236]
Lucian M. Ashworth 2006. Where Are the Idealists in Interwar International Relations? Review of International Studies. 32, 2 (2006), 291–308.
[237]
Maclean, J. 1988. Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 17, 2 (June 1988), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201.
[238]
Maja Zehfuss 2003. Forget September 11. Third World Quarterly. 24, 3 (2003), 513–528.
[239]
Mannheim, K. 1960. Ideology and Utopia: an introduction to the sociology of knowledge. Routledge & K.Paul.
[240]
Mark F. N. Franke 1995. Immanuel Kant and the (Im)Possibility of International Relations Theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 20, 3 (1995), 279–322.
[241]
Mark Rupert 2013. Marxism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[242]
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization. 52, 4 (1998), 887–917.
[243]
Marx, K. et al. 1978. The Marx-Engels reader. Norton.
[244]
Marx, K. and Engels, F. 2008. Bourgeois and Proletarians. The communist manifesto. Pluto Press.
[245]
Mearsheimer, J. Back to the future.
[246]
Mearsheimer, J. Back to the Future.
[247]
Mearsheimer, J. 2013. Chapter 4. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[248]
Mearsheimer, J. 2013. Structural Realism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[249]
Mearsheimer, J. The false promise of international institutions. International Security 19 (3) 1994/5.
[250]
Mearsheimer, J. and Walt, S. An Unnecessary War.
[251]
Mearsheimer, J.J. 2001. The tragedy of Great Power politics. W. W. Norton & Co.
[252]
Michael W. Doyle 1986. Liberalism and World Politics. The American Political Science Review. 80, 4 (1986), 1151–1169.
[253]
Miller, D. 2007. National responsibility and global justice. Oxford University Press.
[254]
Morality and Foreign Policy | Foreign Affairs: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/40521/george-f-kennan/morality-and-foreign-policy.
[255]
Morgenthau, H. 1995. The intellectual and political foundations of a theory of international relations. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[256]
Morgenthau, H.J. 1952. American foreign policy: a critical examination. Methuen.
[257]
Morgenthau, H.J. et al. 2005. Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. McGraw-Hill Education.
[258]
Morgenthau, H.J. 1946. Scientific man vs. power politics. The University of Chicago press.
[259]
Morgenthau, H.J. 1962. The decline of democratic politics. University of Chicago Press.
[260]
Morgenthau, H.J. 1960. The purpose of American politics. Knopf.
[261]
Nardin, T. 2009. International Political Theory. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[262]
Nardin, T. 1983. Law, morality, and the relations of states. Princeton University Press.
[263]
Nardin, T. and Mapel, D.R. 1992. Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge University Press.
[264]
Nardin, T. and Mapel, D.R. 1992. Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge University Press.
[265]
Nau, H. 2008. Scholarship and policy-making: who speaks truth to whom? The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press.
[266]
Navari, C. The Great illusion Revisited: The International theory of Norman Angell. Review of International Studies.
[267]
Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L. 1988. Marxism and the interpretation of culture. University of Illinois Press.
[268]
Neufeld, M.A. 1995. The restructuring of international relations theory. Cambridge University Press.
[269]
Nicholas J. Wheeler and Timothy Dunne 1996. Hedley Bull’s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 72, 1 (1996), 91–107.
[270]
Nicholson, M. 1996. Causes and consequences in international relations: a conceptual study. Pinter.
[271]
Nicholson, M. 1996. Continued Significance of Positivism? International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[272]
Niebuhr, R. 1963. Moral man and immoral society: a study in ethics and politics. S.C.M.Press.
[273]
Niebuhr, R. 2011. The children of light and the children of darkness: a vindication of democracy and a critique of its traditional defense. University of Chicago Press.
[274]
Nina Tannenwald 1999. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use. International Organization. 53, 3 (1999), 433–468.
[275]
O’NEILL, O. 2000. Bounded and cosmopolitan justice. Review of International Studies. 26, 05 (Dec. 2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500000450.
[276]
Onuf, N. and Johnson, T. 1995. Peace in the liberal world: does democracy matter? Controversies in international relations theory: realism and the neoliberal challenge. St. Martin’s Press.
[277]
Peterson, V.S. 1992. Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 21, 2 (June 1992), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210020401.
[278]
Pin-Fat, V. 2014. How do we begin to think about the world? Global politics: a new introduction. Routledge.
[279]
Pin-Fat, V. 2010. Universality, ethics and international relations: a grammatical reading. Routledge.
[280]
PIN-FAT, VÉRONIQUE 2001. (Im)possible universalism: reading human rights in world politics. Review of International Studies. 26, 04 (2001), 663–674.
[281]
PRICE, R. and REUS - SMIT, C. 1998. Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations. 4, 3 (Sept. 1998), 259–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004003001.
[282]
Prozorov, S. and ebrary, Inc 2007. Foucault, freedom and sovereignty. Ashgate.
[283]
Rengger, N.J. and ebrary, Inc 2000. International relations, political theory, and the problem of order: beyond international relations theory?. Routledge.
[284]
Rengger, N.J. and ebrary, Inc 2000. International relations, political theory, and the problem of order: beyond international relations theory?. Routledge.
[285]
Reus-Smit, C. 2009. Constructivism. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[286]
Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. 2008. Constructivism and its Ethics. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press.
[287]
Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press.
[288]
Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press.
[289]
Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press.
[290]
Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press.
[291]
Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. 2008. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press.
[292]
Review by:              William Wallace 1996. Review: Truth and Power, Monks and Technocrats: Theory and Practice in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 22, 3 (1996), 301–321.
[293]
Richard K. Ashley 1984. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization. 38, 2 (1984), 225–286.
[294]
Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker 1990. Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly. 34, 3 (1990), 259–268.
[295]
Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker 1990. Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly. 34, 3 (1990), 259–268.
[296]
Riley, R. and Inayatullah, N. 2006. Interrogating imperialism: conversations on gender, race, and war. Palgrave Macmillan.
[297]
Roach, S. 2013. Critical Theory. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[298]
Roach, S. 2013. Critical Theory. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[299]
Robert Gilpin 1986. The richness of the tradition of political realism. Neorealism and its critics. Columbia University Press.
[300]
Robert O. Keohane 1988. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly. 32, 4 (1988), 379–396.
[301]
Robert O. Keohane and Lisa L. Martin 1995. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security. 20, 1 (1995), 39–51.
[302]
Robert O. Keohane and Lisa L. Martin 1995. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security. 20, 1 (1995), 39–51.
[303]
Rosenau, J. 1996. Probing puzzles persistently. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[304]
Rosenberg, J. 1993. The empire of civil society: a critique of the realist theory of international relations. Verso.
[305]
Roy E. Jones 1981. The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure. Review of International Studies. 7, 1 (1981), 1–13.
[306]
Rupert, M. 2013. Marxism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[307]
Rupert, M. 2000. The hegemonic project of liberal globalization. Ideologies of globalization: contending visions of a new world order. Routledge.
[308]
Russett, B. 2013. Liberalism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[309]
Said, E.W. 2003. Orientalism. Penguin.
[310]
Sayer, D. 1991. Capitalism and modernity: an excursus on Marx and Weber. Routledge.
[311]
Schmidt, B. 2002. On the history and historiography of international relations. Handbook of international relations. SAGE.
[312]
Schmidt, B.C. 1998. The political discourse of anarchy: a disciplinary history of international relations. State University of New York Press.
[313]
Schwarzenberger, G. 1964. Power politics: a study of world society. Stevens.
[314]
Searle, J.R. 1995. The construction of social reality. Penguin.
[315]
Seth, S. 2013. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Routledge.
[316]
Shampa Biswas 2001. ‘Nuclear Apartheid’ as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Resource? Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 26, 4 (2001), 485–522.
[317]
Shampa Biswas 2001. ‘Nuclear Apartheid’ as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Resource? Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 26, 4 (2001), 485–522.
[318]
Shapcott, R. 2008. Critical Theory. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press.
[319]
Shapiro, M.J. and Der Derian, J. 1989. International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington Books.
[320]
Shapiro, M.J. and Der Derian, J. 1989. International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington Books.
[321]
Shepherd, L.J. and Hamilton, C. 2022. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[322]
Shilliam, R. 2011. International relations and non-western thought: imperialism, colonialism, and investigations of global modernity. Routledge.
[323]
Simmons, B. and Martin, L. 2002. Chapter. Handbook of international relations. SAGE.
[324]
Sjoberg, L. 2010. Gender and international security: feminist perspectives. Routledge.
[325]
Sjoberg, L. et al. 2011. Women, gender, and terrorism. University of Georgia Press.
[326]
Smith, M.J. 1986. Realist thought from Weber to Kissinger. Louisiana State University Press.
[327]
Smith, S. et al. 1996. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[328]
Smith, S. et al. 1996. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[329]
Smith, S. 2013. Introduction. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[330]
Smith, S. 1987. Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 16, 2 (June 1987), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298870160022501.
[331]
Smith, S. 2004. Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11. Presidential Address to the International Studies Association, February 27, 2003, Portland, OR. International Studies Quarterly. 48, 3 (Sept. 2004), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.t01-1-00312.x.
[332]
Smith, S. 1995. Ten Self-Images of the Discipline: A genealogy of International Relations Theory. International relations theory today. Polity Press.
[333]
Smith, S. 1992. The Forty Years’ Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 21, 3 (Dec. 1992), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030301.
[334]
Smith, S. 2002. The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: ‘Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline’. International Studies Review. 4, 2 (Sept. 2002), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00255.
[335]
SMITH, STEVE 2000. Power and truth; a reply to William Wallace. Review of International Studies. 23, 04 (2000), 507–516.
[336]
Spegele, R.D. 1996. Political realism in international theory. Cambridge University Press.
[337]
Steans, J. 1998. Gender and international relations: an introduction. Polity.
[338]
Sterling-Folker, J. 2014. All Hail to the Chief: Liberal IR Theory in the New World Order. International Studies Perspectives. (Nov. 2014), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12089.
[339]
Sterling-Folker, J. 2013. Chapter 6. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[340]
Sterling-Folker, J. 2013. Neo-Liberalism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[341]
Suganami, H. The international society perspective on world politics reconsidered’, International relations of the Asia-Pacific.
[342]
Sutch, P. 2001. Ethics, justice, and international relations: constructing an international community. Routledge.
[343]
Sylvester, C. and ebrary, Inc 2002. Feminist international relations: an unfinished journey. Cambridge University Press.
[344]
Tan, K.-C. 2004. Justice without borders: cosmopolitanism, nationalism, and patriotism. Cambridge University Press.
[345]
Ted Hopf 1998. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 23, 1 (1998), 171–200.
[346]
Ted Hopf 1998. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 23, 1 (1998), 171–200.
[347]
Teschke, B. 2008. Marxism. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press.
[348]
Teschke, B. 2009. The myth of 1648: class, geopolitics, and the making of modern international relations. Verso.
[349]
TESCHKE, B. 2002. Theorizing the Westphalian System of States: International Relations from Absolutism to Capitalism. European Journal of International Relations. 8, 1 (Mar. 2002), 5–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008001001.
[350]
Tickner, A.B. and Wæver, O. 2009. International relations: scholarship around the world. Routledge.
[351]
Tickner, J.A. 2001. Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. Columbia University Press.
[352]
Tickner, J.A. 1999. Why Women Can’t Run the World: International Politics According to Francis Fukuyama. International Studies Review. 1, 3 (Dec. 1999), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00162.
[353]
Tickner, J.A. 1997. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 41, 4 (Dec. 1997), 611–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00060.
[354]
Tickner, J.A. and Sjoberg, L. 2010. Feminism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[355]
Tickner, J.A. and Sjoberg, L. 2013. Feminism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[356]
Toni Erskine 2013. Normative IR Theory. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[357]
True, J. 2009. Feminism. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[358]
Various Forum on English School. Review of International Studies.
[359]
Vasquez, J.A. and ebrary, Inc 1998. The power of power politics: from classical realism to neotraditionalism. Cambridge University Press.
[360]
Véronique Pin-Fat 2005. The Metaphysics of the National Interest and the ‘Mysticism’ of the Nation-State: Reading Hans J. Morgenthau. Review of International Studies. 31, 2 (2005), 217–236.
[361]
Vincent, R.J. 1974. Nonintervention and international order. Princeton University Press.
[362]
Viotti, P.R. and Kauppi, M.V. 1998. Pluralism: decisionmaking, transnationalism and interdependence. International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism. Allyn and Bacon.
[363]
WAeVER, O. 1992. International Society -- Theoretical Promises Unfulfilled? Cooperation and Conflict. 27, 1 (Mar. 1992), 97–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836792027001004.
[364]
Waever, O. 1996. The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[365]
Waever, O. The sociology of not so international discipline. International Organization.
[366]
Walker, R.B.J. 2010. After the globe, before the world. Routledge.
[367]
Walker, R.B.J. 1993. Inside/outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge University Press.
[368]
Walker, R.B.J. 1993. Inside/outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge University Press.
[369]
Waltz, K. 1986. Reflections on theory of international politics. Neorealism and its critics. Columbia University Press.
[370]
Waltz, K.N. 2001. Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press.
[371]
Waltz, K.N. 1979. Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill.
[372]
Walzer, M. 1985. Spheres of justice: a defence of pluralism and equality. Blackwell.
[373]
Walzer, M. 1994. Thick and thin: moral agrument at home and abroad. University of Notre Dame Press.
[374]
Weber, C. 1994. Good Girls, Little Girls, and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 23, 2 (June 1994), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298940230021401.
[375]
Wendt, A. 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
[376]
Wendt, A. 2003. Why a World State is Inevitable. European Journal of International Relations. 9, 4 (Dec. 2003), 491–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/135406610394001.
[377]
Wendt, A.E. 1987. The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization. 41, 03 (June 1987). https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002751X.
[378]
Wight, C. 2002. Chapter ‘Philosophy of science and international relations’. Handbook of international relations. SAGE.
[379]
Wight, M. et al. 2005. Four seminal thinkers in international theory: Machiavelli, Grotius, Kant, and Mazzini. Oxford University Press.
[380]
Wight, M. et al. 1991. International theory: the three traditions. Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
[381]
Wight, M. et al. 1991. International theory: the three traditions. Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
[382]
Wight, M. 1977. Systems of states. Leicester University Press.
[383]
Wight, M. 1966. Why is there no international theory. Diplomatic investigations: essays in the theory of international politics. Allen & Unwin.
[384]
Wight, M. 1995. Why is there no International Theory? International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[385]
WILLIAMS, M.C. 2001. The Discipline of the Democratic Peace:: Kant, Liberalism and the Social Construction of Security Communities. European Journal of International Relations. 7, 4 (Dec. 2001), 525–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066101007004006.
[386]
Williams, M.C. 2005. The realist tradition and the limits of international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[387]
Williams, M.C. and ebrary, Inc 2007. Realism reconsidered: the legacy of Hans Morgenthau in international relations. Oxford University Press.
[388]
Williams, M.C. and ebrary, Inc 2007. Realism reconsidered: the legacy of Hans Morgenthau in international relations. Oxford University Press.
[389]
Wilson, Peter 2001. The myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies. 24, 05 (2001), 1–16.
[390]
Wilson, Peter 2001. The myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies. 24, 05 (2001), 1–16.
[391]
Winch, P. 1990. The idea of a social science: and its relation to philosophy ; second edition. Routledge.
[392]
Wolfers, A. 1965. Statesmanship and moral choice. Discord and collaboration: essays on international politics. Johns Hopkins University Press.
[393]
Woods, N. 1996. ch 1. Explaining international relations since 1945. Oxford University Press.
[394]
Wyn Jones, R. 2001. Critical theory and world politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[395]
Zalewski, M. 2013. Feminist international relations: exquisite corpse. Routledge.
[396]
Zehfuss, M. 2014. Conclusion. Global politics: a new introduction. Routledge.
[397]
ZEHFUSS, M. 2001. Constructivism and Identity:: A Dangerous Liaison. European Journal of International Relations. 7, 3 (Sept. 2001), 315–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066101007003002.
[398]
Zehfuss, M. 2002. Constructivism in international relations: the politics of reality. Cambridge University Press.
[399]
2000. Forum on <em>Social Theory of International Politics</em>. Review of International Studies. 26, 01 (2000), 123–124.
[400]
The false promise of international institutions.
[401]
The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security. 19, 3, 5–49.