Bibliography for IP30120 International Political Theory Today BETA

Abrahamsen, R. (2007). Postcolonialism. In International relations theory for the twenty-first century: an introduction. Routledge.

Adam Jones. (1996). Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 22(4), 405–429. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/20097459?sid=21106237920623&uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=2129

Adler, E., & Barnett, M. N. (1998). Security communities: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Alan James. (1989). The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 15(3), 215–229. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097183?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Alderson, K., Hurrell, A., & ebrary, Inc. (2000). Hedley Bull on international society [Electronic resource]. Macmillan. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=5007593

Alexander Wendt. (1992a). Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Alexander Wendt. (1992b). Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Alexander Wendt. (1995a). Constructing International Politics. International Security, 20(1), 71–81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Alexander Wendt. (1995b). Constructing International Politics. International Security, 20(1), 71–81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Alexander Wendt. (1995c). Constructing International Politics. International Security, 20(1), 71–81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Andreas Osiander. (1998a). Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited. International Studies Quarterly, 42(3), 409–432. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600745?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Andreas Osiander. (1998b). Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited. International Studies Quarterly, 42(3), 409–432. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600745?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Anievas, A. (2010). Marxism and world politics: contesting global capitalism. Routledge.

Antonio Franceschet. (2001). Sovereignty and Freedom: Immanuel Kant’s Liberal Internationalist ‘Legacy’. Review of International Studies, 27(2), 209–228. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097728?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

ARCHIBUGI, D. (1995). Immanuel Kant, Cosmopolitan Law and Peace. European Journal of International Relations, 1(4), 429–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066195001004002

Archibugi, D., & Held, D. (1995). Cosmopolitan democracy: an agenda for a new world order. In Democracy and international system. Polity Press.

Aron, R., Draus, F., & Shils, E. (1985). History, truth, liberty: selected writings of Raymond Aron. In On the morality of prudence. University of Chicago Press.

Ashley, R. K. (1988). Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 227–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020901

Audie Klotz. (1995). Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions Against South Africa. International Organization, 49(3), 451–478. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706905?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Bain, W. (2003). Between anarchy and society: trusteeship and the obligations of power. Oxford University Press.

BAIN, WILLIAM. (2000a). Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered. Review of International Studies, 26(03), 445–464. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=54165&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210500004459

BAIN, WILLIAM. (2000b). Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered. Review of International Studies, 26(03), 445–464. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=54165&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210500004459

Baldwin, D. A. (1993). Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Barkawi, T. (2001). War inside the free world. In Democracy, liberalism, and war: rethinking the democratic peace debate: Vol. Critical security studies. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Barry Buzan. (1993). From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School. International Organization, 47(3), 327–352. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706979?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Bartelson, J. (1995). A genealogy of sovereignty: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Beitz, C. R. (1999). Social and Cosmopolitan Liberalism. International Affairs, 75(3), 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00091

Beitz, C. R. & NetLibrary, Inc. (1999). Political theory and international relations [Electronic resource]. Princeton University Press. http://www.netLibrary.com/urlapi.asp?action=summary&v=1&bookid=99680

Bellamy, A. J. (2005). International society and its critics [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780191532702

Bidet, J., & Kouvélakis, E. (2009). Critical companion to contemporary Marxism: Vol. Historical materialism book series. Haymarket Books.

Biersteker, T. J., & Weber, C. (1996). State sovereignty as social construct: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Bilgin, P. (2008a). Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly, 29(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701726392

Bilgin, P. (2008b). Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly, 29(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701726392

Bilgin, P. (2010). Looking for ‘the International’ beyond the West. Third World Quarterly, 31(5), 817–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2010.502696

Biswas, S. (2007). Empire and Global Public Intellectuals: Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 36(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298070360010801

Biswas, S. (2013). Postcolonialism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Booth, K. (1999). Three tyrannies. In Human rights in global politics. Cambridge University Press.

Booth, K. (2011). Realism and world politics. Routledge.

Booth, K., Cox, M., & Dunne, T. (1998). The eighty years’ crisis: international relations 1919-1999. Cambridge University Press.

Booth, K., & Dunne, T. (2002). Worlds in collision: terror and the future of global order. Palgrave.

Booth, K., Dunne, T., & Cox, M. (2001). How might we live?: global ethics in a new century. Cambridge University Press.

Booth, K., & Smith, S. (1995a). International relations theory today. Polity Press.

Booth, K., & Smith, S. (1995b). International relations theory today. Polity Press.

Brassett, J., & Bulley, D. (2007). Ethics in World Politics: Cosmopolitanism and Beyond? International Politics, 44(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800155

Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (2009). Understanding international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.

Bull, H. (1995a). Chapter 8: The Theory of International Politics. In International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.

Bull, H. (1995b). Society and anarchy in international relations. In International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.

Bull, H. (1995c). Society and Anarchy in International Relations. In International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.

Bull, H. (2000). Justice in international relations, Hagey lectures [Electronic resource]. In Hedley Bull on international society. Macmillan. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=5007593

Bull, H. (2012). The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics (S. Hoffmann & A. Hurrell, Eds; Fourth edition) [E-book]. Palgrave Macmillan. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=4606254720002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Bull, H., Alderson, K., Hurrell, A., & NetLibrary, Inc. (2000). Hedley Bull on international society [Electronic resource]. Macmillan Press. http://www.netLibrary.com/urlapi.asp?action=summary&v=1&bookid=61053

Bull, H., Kingsbury, B., & Roberts, A. (1990). Hugo Grotius and international relations. Clarendon.

Bull, H., & Watson, A. (1984). The Expansion of international society. Clarendon.

Burchill, S. (2009). Theories of international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.

Butterfield, H. (2019). Diplomatic investigations (H. Butterfield & M. Wright, Eds) [E-book]. Oxford University Press. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=4776381570002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Buzan, B. (1996a). The timeless wisdom of realism? In International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Buzan, B. (1996b). Timeless Wisdom of Realism? In International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Buzan, B. & ebrary, Inc. (2004). From international to world society?: English school theory and the social structure of globalisation: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10124685

Buzan, B., Jones, C. A., & Little, R. (1993). The logic of anarchy: neorealism to structural realism: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Callinicos, A. (n.d.). Actuality of imperialism. Millennium 31 (2) 2002. http://mil.sagepub.com/content/31/2/319.full.pdf

Campbell, D. (2013a). Poststructuralism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Campbell, D. (2013b). Poststructuralism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Campbell, D. & ebrary, Inc. (1998a). National deconstruction: violence, identity, and justice in Bosnia [Electronic resource]. University of Minnesota Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10202555

Campbell, D. & ebrary, Inc. (1998b). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity (Rev. ed) [Electronic resource]. University of Minnesota Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10159576

Campbell, D., & Shapiro, M. J. (1999). Moral spaces: rethinking ethics and world politics. University of Minnesota Press.

Caney, S. (2005). Justice beyond borders: a global political theory. Oxford University Press.

Carlsnaes, W., Simmons, B. A., & Risse-Kappen, T. (2002a). Handbook of international relations. SAGE. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037238880002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Carlsnaes, W., Simmons, B. A., & Risse-Kappen, T. (2002b). Handbook of international relations. SAGE. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037243300002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Carr, E. H. (1942). Conditions of peace. Macmillan.

Carr, E. H., & Cox, M. (2001a). The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Palgrave.

Carr, E. H., & Cox, M. (2001b). The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Palgrave.

CARVER, TERRELL; COCHRAN, MOLLY; SQUIRES, JUDITH. (2000). Gendering Jones: feminisms, IRs, masculinities. Review of International Studies, 24(02), 283–297. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=33581

CAVALLAR, G. (2001). Kantian perspectives on democratic peace: alternatives to Doyle. Review of International Studies, 27(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500002291

Chowdhry, G., & Nair, S. (2004). Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class: Vol. Routledge advances in international relations and global politics. Routledge.

Chris Brown. (1995). International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way? Review of International Studies, 21(2), 183–196. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097405?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Chris Brown. (2005). The House That Chuck Built: Twenty-Five Years of Reading Charles Beitz. Review of International Studies, 31(2), 371–379. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40072103?sid=21106238986013&uid=2&uid=4&uid=70&uid=3738032&uid=2129

Clark, I. (1999). Globalization and international relations theory. Oxford University Press.

Clark, I. (2005). Legitimacy in international society [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780191531668

Clinton, W. D. & ebrary, Inc. (2007a). The realist tradition and contemporary international relations: Vol. Political traditions in foreign policy [Electronic resource]. Louisiana State University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10297284

Clinton, W. D. & ebrary, Inc. (2007b). The realist tradition and contemporary international relations: Vol. Political traditions in foreign policy [Electronic resource]. Louisiana State University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10297284

Collin, F. (1985). Theory and understanding: a critique of interpretive social science. Blackwell.

Collingwood, R. G. (1961). The idea of history: Vol. Oxford paperbacks. Oxford University Press.

Copeland, D. (2003). A Realist critique of the English School. Review of International Studies, 29(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004273

Cox, M., Booth, K., & Dunne, T. (1999). The interregnum: controversies in world politics 1989-1999. New York.

Cox, M., Dunne, T., & Booth, K. (2001). Empires, systems and states: great transformations in international politics. Cambridge University Press.

Cox, M., Ikenberry, G. J., & Inoguchi, T. (2000). American democracy promotion: impulses, strategies, and impacts. Oxford University Press.

Cox, R. (1986). Social Forces, States and World Orders. In Neorealism and its critics: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Cox, R. (2008a). The point is not just to explain the world but to change it. In The Oxford handbook of international relations: Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press.

Cox, R. (2008b). The point is not just to explain the World but to change It. In The Oxford handbook of international relations: Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press.

Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501

COZETTE, M. (2008). Reclaiming the critical dimension of realism: Hans J. Morgenthau on the ethics of scholarship. Review of International Studies, 34(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210508007882

Craig, C. (2007a). Glimmer of a new Leviathan: total war in the realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. Columbia University Press.

Craig, C. (2007b). Glimmer of a new Leviathan: total war in the realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. Columbia University Press.

D. J. Markwell. (1986). Sir Alfred Zimmern Revisited: Fifty Years On. Review of International Studies, 12(4), 279–292. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097090?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Darby, P. (2000). At the edge of international relations: postcolonialism, gender and dependency. Continuum.

Davenport, A. (2013). Marxism in IR: Condemned to a Realist fate? European Journal of International Relations, 19(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111416021

David L. Blaney and Naeem Inayatullah. (2000). The Westphalian Deferral. International Studies Review, 2(2), 29–64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186427?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

David Long. (1991). J. A. Hobson and Idealism in International Relations. Review of International Studies, 17(3), 285–304. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097263?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Dean, M. (1994). Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. Routledge. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5429999310002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Der Derian, J. (1995a). International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.

Der Derian, J. (1995b). International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.

Der Derian, J. (1995c). International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.

Donnelly, J. (1992). Twentieth century realism. In Traditions of international ethics: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Donnelly, J. (2009a). Realism. In Theories of international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.

Donnelly, J. (2009b). Realism. In Theories of international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.

Donnelly, J. & ebrary, Inc. (2000a). Realism and international relations: Vol. Themes in international relations [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=2000672

Donnelly, J. & ebrary, Inc. (2000b). Realism and international relations: Vol. Themes in international relations [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=2000672

Doty, R. L. & ebrary, Inc. (1996). Imperial encounters: the politics of representation in North-South relations: Vol. Borderlines [Electronic resource]. University of Minnesota Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10159633

Doyle, M. W. (1997). Ways of war and peace: realism, liberalism, and socialism (1st ed). Norton.

Doyle, M. W., & Ikenberry, G. J. (1997). New thinking in international relations theory. Westview Press.

DUNNE, T. (1995). International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled? Cooperation and Conflict, 30(2), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836795030002002

Dunne, T. (1998). Inventing international society: a history of the English school: Vol. St. Antony’s series. Macmillan Press Ltd.

Dunne, T. (2013a). Chapter 7. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T. (2013b). English School. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Hansen, L., & Wight, C. (2013a). The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485

Dunne, T., Hansen, L., & Wight, C. (2013b). The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (Eds). (2016). International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.

Edkins, J. (1996). Legality with a Vengeance: Famines and Humanitarian Relief in ‘Complex Emergencies’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 25(3), 547–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298960250030501

Edkins, J. (2003). Trauma and the memory of politics. Cambridge University Press.

Edkins, J. (2005). Ethics and Practices of Engagement: Intellectuals as Experts. International Relations, 19(1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805050062

Edkins, J. (2007). Poststructuralism. In International relations theory for the twenty-first century: an introduction. Routledge.

Edkins, J. (2023). Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Edkins, J., & Pin-Fat, V. (2005). Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 34(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050340010101

Edkins, J., & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2009). Critical theorists and international relations [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203881842

EDKINS, J., & ZEHFUSS, M. (2005). Generalising the international. Review of International Studies, 31(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006583

Edkins, J., & Zehfuss, M. (2014a). Global politics: a new introduction (Second edition) [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203076897

Edkins, J., & Zehfuss, M. (2014b). Global politics: a new introduction (Second edition) [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203076897

Edkins, J., & Zehfuss, M. (2014c). Global politics: a new introduction (Second edition) [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203076897

Ehlstain, J. B. (1995). International Politics and Political Theory. In International relations theory today. Polity Press.

Elman, C., & Elman, M. F. (2001). Bridges and boundaries: historians, political scientists, and the study of international relations: Vol. BCSIA studies in international security. MIT Press.

Enloe, C. H. (n.d.). Bananas, beaches & bases: making feminist sense of international politics.

Enloe, C. H. (1993). The morning after: sexual politics at the end of the Cold War. University of California Press.

Erskine, T. (2013). Normative Theory. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Escobar, A. & ebrary, Inc. (1995). Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World: Vol. Princeton studies in culture/power/history [Electronic resource]. Princeton University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10031960

Ferguson, J. (1994). The anti-politics machine: ‘development,’ depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. University of Minnesota Press.

Ferguson, Y. H. (2015). Diversity in IR Theory: Pluralism as an Opportunity for Understanding Global Politics. International Studies Perspectives, 16(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12092

Fierke, K. (2013a). Constructivism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Fierke, K. (2013b). Constructivism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Forum on <em>Social Theory of International Politics</em>. (2000). Review of International Studies, 26(01), 123–124. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=33419&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210500001236

Friedrich Kratochwil. (1993). The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik without Politics. Review of International Studies, 19(1), 63–80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097320?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Frost, M., & Frost, M. (1996). Ethics in international relations: a constitutive theory: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Fukuyama, F. (2020). The end of history and the last man ([Updated edition]). Penguin Books. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=5838429480002418&amp;institutionId=2418&amp;customerId=2415

George, J. (1994a). ch 5. In Discourses of global politics: a critical (re)introduction to international relations. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

George, J. (1994b). Discourses of global politics: a critical (re)introduction to international relations. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

George, J. (1995). Realist ‘Ethics’, International Relations, and Post-modernism: Thinking Beyond the Egoism-Anarchy Thematic. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 24(2), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298950240020301

Gill, S. (1993). Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Gill, S. (1998a). New constitutionalism, democratisation and global political economy∗. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change, 10(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781159808412845

Gill, S. (1998b). New constitutionalism, democratisation and global political economy∗. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change, 10(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781159808412845

Gilpin, R. (1986). The richness of the tradition of political realism. In Neorealism and its critics: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Grovogui, S. (2013). Postcolonialism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Grovogui, S. N. (1996). Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans: race and self-determination in international law: Vol. v. 3 (1st ed). University of Minnesota Press.

Guzzini, S., & Leander, A. (2006a). Constructivism and international relations: Alexander Wendt and his critics: Vol. New international relations. Routledge.

Guzzini, S., & Leander, A. (2006b). Constructivism and international relations: Alexander Wendt and his critics: Vol. New international relations. Routledge.

Halliday, F. (1994a). Chapter 1. In Rethinking international relations. Macmillan.

Halliday, F. (1994b). International society as homogeneity. In Rethinking international relations. Macmillan.

Halliday, F. (1994c). Rethinking international relations. In Theories in contention. Macmillan.

Halliday, F. (1994d). Rethinking international relations. Macmillan.

Halliday, F. (1994e). Rethinking international relations. Macmillan.

Halliday, F. (1996). Chapter 11: The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes. In International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

HALLIDAY, FRED; ROSENBERG, JUSTIN. (2000). Interview with Ken Waltz CONDUCTED BY FRED HALLIDAY AND JUSTIN ROSENBERG. Review of International Studies, 24(03), 371–386. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=33595&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210598003714

Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2001). Empire. Harvard University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037307710002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2006). Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire. Penguin.

Haslam, J. (2002). No virtue like necessity: realist thought in international relations since Machiavelli. Yale University Press.

Hobson, J. M. & ebrary, Inc. (2000). The state and international relations: Vol. Themes in international relations [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=2000778

Hoffman, M. (1987). Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 16(2), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298870160022801

Hoffman, M. (1991). Restructuring, Reconstruction, . Reinscription, Rearticulation: Four Voices in Critical International Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 20(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298910200021001

Hollis, M. (1994). The philosophy of social science: an introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1990). Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon Press.

Holsti, K. (n.d.). The study of International Relations During the Cold War. Review of International Studies. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=71442&jid=RIS&volumeId=24&issueId=05&aid=71441

Holsti, K. J. (1985). The dividing discipline: hegemony and diversity in international theory. Allen & Unwin.

Hurrell, A. (2002). Chapter ‘Norms and Ethics in International relations’ in Handbook of international relations. In Handbook of international relations. SAGE. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039446850002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

HUTCHINGS, K. (2007). Happy Anniversary! Time and critique in International Relations theory. Review of International Studies, 33(S1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007401

Hutchings, K. (2010). Global ethics: an introduction. Polity.

Hutchings, K. & ebrary, Inc. (1996). Kant, critique and politics [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10017133

Huysmans, J. (2004). Minding Exceptions: The Politics of Insecurity and Liberal Democracy. Contemporary Political Theory, 3(3), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300137

J. Ann Tickner. (1997). You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 611–632. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Jackson, P. T. (2011). The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics: Vol. The new international relations [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203843321

Jackson, R. (1996). Is there a classical international theory? In International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Jackson, R. H. (1990). Martin Wight, International Theory and the Good Life. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 19(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190020901

Jackson, R. H. (2000). The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780191522604

Jahn, B. (1998). One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 27(3), 613–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270030201

John Gerard Ruggie. (1998). What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization, 52(4), 855–885. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601360?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

John Lewis Gaddis. (1993). International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War. International Security, 17(3), 5–58. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2539129?sid=21106239130283&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=3738032&uid=70&uid=4

John M. Hobson. (1998). The Historical Sociology of the State and the State of Historical Sociology in International Relations. Review of International Political Economy, 5(2), 284–320. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4177267?sid=21106239150993&uid=2129&uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4

John Macmillan. (1996). Democracies Don’t Fight: A Case of the Wrong Research Agenda? Review of International Studies, 22(3), 275–299. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097449?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Jones, R. W. (2001). Locating Critical in Critical international Relations Theory. In Critical theory and world politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Joseph M. Grieco. (1988). Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization, 42(3), 485–507. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Kahler, M. (1997). Inventing International Relations. In New thinking in international relations theory. Westview Press.

Kant, I. (1991). Perpetual peace. In Kant: political writings: Vol. Cambridge texts in the history of political thought (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press.

Kate Manzo. (1997). Critical Humanism: Postcolonialism and Postmodern Ethics. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 22(3), 381–408. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40644896?sid=21106238545153&uid=2&uid=4&uid=70&uid=2129&uid=3738032

Katzenstein, P. J. (1998). Cultural norms and national security: police and military in postwar Japan. Cornell University Press.

Katzenstein, P. J., Keohane, R. O., & Krasner, S. D. (1999). Exploration and contestation in the study of world politics. MIT Press.

Kauppi, M. V., & Viotti, P. R. (2020). Chapter 1. In International relations theory (Sixth edition). Rowman & Littlefield. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&amp;isbn=9781538115701

Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037307730002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Kegley, C. W. (1995). Controversies in international relations theory: realism and the neoliberal challenge. St. Martin’s Press.

Ken Booth. (1991). Security and Emancipation. Review of International Studies, 17(4), 313–326. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097269?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Ken Booth. (1995). Human Wrongs and International Relations. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 71(1), 103–126. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2624012?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Ken Booth. (1997). Discussion: A Reply to Wallace. Review of International Studies, 23(3), 371–377. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097487?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Kennan, G. (n.d.). Morality and Foreign Policy | Foreign Affairs. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/40521/george-f-kennan/morality-and-foreign-policy

Kennan, G. F. (1952). American diplomacy, 1900-1950. Secker & Warburg.

Kenneth N. Waltz. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5–41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Keohane, R. O. (1986a). Neorealism and its critics: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Keohane, R. O. (1986b). Neorealism and its critics: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Keohane, R. O. (1989). International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 18(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298890180021001

Keohane, R. O. (1998). Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory. International Studies Quarterly, 42(1), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00076

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1989). Power and interdependence: Vol. Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown series in political science (2nd ed). Scott, Foresman.

Knutsen, T. L. (1997). A history of international relations theory (2nd ed). Manchester University Press.

Krishna, S. (n.d.-a). Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century [Electronic resource]. Rowman & Littlefield. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780742557642

Krishna, S. (n.d.-b). Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century [Electronic resource]. Rowman & Littlefield. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shibboleth.aber.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780742557642

Kubálková, V., & Cruickshank, A. A. (1980). Marxism-Leninism and theory of international relations. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Kubálková, V., Onuf, N. G., & Kowert, P. (1998). International relations in a constructed world. M.E. Sharpe.

Kurki, M. (2011a). The Limitations of the Critical Edge: Reflections on Critical and Philosophical IR Scholarship Today. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 40(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811411997

Kurki, M. (2011b). The Limitations of the Critical Edge: Reflections on Critical and Philosophical IR Scholarship Today. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 40(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811411997

Kurki, M., & Wight, C. (2013a). Chapter 1 of International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Kurki, M., & Wight, C. (2013b). International Relations as a Social Science. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Lebow, N. (2013a). Classical Realism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Lebow, N. (2013b). Classical Realism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Lebow, R. N. (2003). The Tragic vision of politics: ethics, interests, and orders. Cambridge University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037307740002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Lebow, R. N. (2008). A cultural theory of international relations. Cambridge University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037264560002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Lebow, R. N., & Risse-Kappen, T. (1995). International relations theory and the end of the Cold War. In Understanding change. Columbia University Press.

Ling, L. H. M. (2002). Postcolonial international relations: conquest and desire between Asia and the West: Vol. International political economy series. Palgrave.

Linklater, A. (1990). Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations [Electronic resource]. Macmillan.

Linklater, A. (1995). Neorealism in theory and practice. In International relations theory today. Polity Press.

Linklater, A. (1996). Achievements of Critical Theory. In International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Linklater, A. (1998). The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the post-Westphalian era. Polity.

Linklater, A. (1999). The Evolving Spheres of International Justice. International Affairs, 75(3), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00088

Linklater, A. (2000). International relations: critical concepts in political science. Routledge.

Linklater, A. (2007). Critical theory and world politics: citizenship, sovereignty and humanity. Routledge.

Linklater, A. (2009a). Marx and Marxism. In Theories of international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.

Linklater, A. (2009b). The English School. In Theories of international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.

Linklater, A. & London School of Economics and Political Science. (1990). Men and citizens in the theory of international relations (2nd ed). Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics and Political Science.

Linklater, A., & Suganami, H. (2006). The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780511314704

Little, R. (1996). Growing Relevance of Pluralism. In International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Long, D. (1995). The Harvard School of Liberal International Theory: A Case for Closure. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 24(3), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298950240031201

Long, D., & Wilson, P. (1995). Thinkers of The twenty years’ crisis: inter-war idealism reassessed. In Introduction. Clarendon Press.

Long, D., Wilson, P., & Navari, C. (1995). Thinkers of The twenty years’ crisis: inter-war idealism reassessed. In David Mitrany and international functionalism. Clarendon Press.

Loomba, A. (2005). Colonialism - postcolonialism: Vol. New critical idiom (2nd. ed) [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203087596

Lucian M. Ashworth. (2006). Where Are the Idealists in Interwar International Relations? Review of International Studies, 32(2), 291–308. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40072139?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Maclean, J. (1988). Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201

Maja Zehfuss. (2003). Forget September 11. Third World Quarterly, 24(3), 513–528. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3993383?sid=21106237920623&uid=3738032&uid=4&uid=2&uid=2129&uid=70

Mannheim, K. (1960). Ideology and Utopia: an introduction to the sociology of knowledge: Vol. Routledge paperbacks. Routledge & K.Paul.

Mark F. N. Franke. (1995). Immanuel Kant and the (Im)Possibility of International Relations Theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 20(3), 279–322. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644836?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Mark Rupert. (2013a). Marxism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2008). Bourgeois and Proletarians [Electronic resource]. In The communist manifesto: Vol. Get political (New ed). Pluto Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039312470002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Marx, K., Engels, F., & Tucker, R. C. (1978). The Marx-Engels reader (2nd ed). Norton.

Mearsheimer, J. (n.d.-a). Back to the future. http://aspire.aber.ac.uk/ui/forms/bookmarklet.html?fast=true&promptForBookmarkButtonUpdate=true&title=&uri=http%253A%252F%252Fmearsheimer.uchicago.edu%252Fpdfs%252FA0017.pdf

Mearsheimer, J. (n.d.-b). Back to the Future. http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0017.pdf

Mearsheimer, J. (n.d.-c). The false promise of international institutions. International Security 19 (3) 1994/5. http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0021.pdf

Mearsheimer, J. (2013a). Chapter 4. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Mearsheimer, J. (2013b). Structural Realism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of Great Power politics. W. W. Norton & Co.

Mearsheimer, J., & Walt, S. (n.d.). An Unnecessary War. http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0032.pdf

Michael W. Doyle. (1986). Liberalism and World Politics. The American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1151–1169. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1960861?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Miller, D. (2007). National responsibility and global justice [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780191528576

Morgenthau, H. (1995). The intellectual and political foundations of a theory of international relations. In International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1946). Scientific man vs. power politics. The University of Chicago press.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1952). American foreign policy: a critical examination. Methuen.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1960). The purpose of American politics. Knopf.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1962). The decline of democratic politics: Vol. Politics in the twentieth century. University of Chicago Press.

Morgenthau, H. J., Thompson, K. W., & Clinton, W. D. (2005). Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace (7th ed). McGraw-Hill Education.

Nardin, T. (1983). Law, morality, and the relations of states. Princeton University Press.

Nardin, T. (2009). International Political Theory. In Theories of international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.

Nardin, T., & Mapel, D. R. (1992a). Traditions of international ethics. In Twentieth century realism: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Nardin, T., & Mapel, D. R. (1992b). Traditions of international ethics. In Liberalism and international reform: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Nau, H. (2008). Scholarship and policy-making: who speaks truth to whom? In The Oxford handbook of international relations: Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press.

Navari, C. (n.d.). The Great illusion Revisited: The International theory of Norman Angell. Review of International Studies. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=6280224&jid=RIS&volumeId=15&issueId=04&aid=6280216

Nelson, C., & Grossberg, L. (1988). Marxism and the interpretation of culture. University of Illinois Press.

Neufeld, M. A. (1995). The restructuring of international relations theory: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Nicholas J. Wheeler and Timothy Dunne. (1996). Hedley Bull’s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 72(1), 91–107. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2624751?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Nicholson, M. (1996a). Causes and consequences in international relations: a conceptual study. Pinter.

Nicholson, M. (1996b). Continued Significance of Positivism? In International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Niebuhr, R. (1963). Moral man and immoral society: a study in ethics and politics. S.C.M.Press.

Niebuhr, R. (2011). The children of light and the children of darkness: a vindication of democracy and a critique of its traditional defense (University of Chicago Press edition). University of Chicago Press.

Nina Tannenwald. (1999). The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use. International Organization, 53(3), 433–468. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601286

O’NEILL, O. (2000). Bounded and cosmopolitan justice. Review of International Studies, 26(05). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500000450

Onuf, N., & Johnson, T. (1995). Peace in the liberal world: does democracy matter? In Controversies in international relations theory: realism and the neoliberal challenge. St. Martin’s Press.

Peterson, V. S. (1992). Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 21(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210020401

Pin-Fat, V. (2010). Universality, ethics and international relations: a grammatical reading: Vol. Interventions. Routledge.

Pin-Fat, V. (2014). How do we begin to think about the world? [Electronic resource]. In Global politics: a new introduction (Second edition). Routledge. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039312480002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

PIN-FAT, VÉRONIQUE. (2001). (Im)possible universalism: reading human rights in world politics. Review of International Studies, 26(04), 663–674. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=62985

PRICE, R., & REUS - SMIT, C. (1998). Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations, 4(3), 259–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004003001

Prozorov, S. & ebrary, Inc. (2007). Foucault, freedom and sovereignty [Electronic resource]. Ashgate. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10211498

Rengger, N. J. & ebrary, Inc. (2000a). International relations, political theory, and the problem of order: beyond international relations theory? Vol. The New international relations [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10017509

Rengger, N. J. & ebrary, Inc. (2000b). International relations, political theory, and the problem of order: beyond international relations theory? Vol. The New international relations [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10017509

Reus-Smit, C. (2009). Constructivism. In Theories of international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.

Reus-Smit, C., & Snidal, D. (2008a). Constructivism and its Ethics. In The Oxford handbook of international relations: Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press.

Reus-Smit, C., & Snidal, D. (2008b). The Oxford handbook of international relations: Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press.

Reus-Smit, C., & Snidal, D. (2008c). The Oxford handbook of international relations: Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press.

Reus-Smit, C., & Snidal, D. (2008d). The Oxford handbook of international relations: Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press.

Reus-Smit, C., & Snidal, D. (2008e). The Oxford handbook of international relations: Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press.

Reus-Smit, C., & Snidal, D. (2008f). The Oxford handbook of international relations: Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press.

Review by:              William Wallace. (1996). Review: Truth and Power, Monks and Technocrats: Theory and Practice in International Relations. Review of International Studies, 22(3), 301–321. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097450?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Richard K. Ashley. (1984). The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization, 38(2), 225–286. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker. (1990a). Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 259–268. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2600569?sid=21106237920623&uid=3738032&uid=4&uid=70&uid=2&uid=2129

Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker. (1990b). Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 259–268. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600569?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Riley, R., & Inayatullah, N. (2006). Interrogating imperialism: conversations on gender, race, and war [Electronic resource]. Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780230601710

Roach, S. (2013a). Critical Theory. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Roach, S. (2013b). Critical Theory. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Robert Gilpin. (1986). The richness of the tradition of political realism. In Neorealism and its critics: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Robert O. Keohane. (1988). International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 379–396. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600589

Robert O. Keohane and Lisa L. Martin. (1995a). The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security, 20(1), 39–51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539214?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Robert O. Keohane and Lisa L. Martin. (1995b). The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security, 20(1), 39–51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539214?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Rosenau, J. (1996). Probing puzzles persistently. In International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Rosenberg, J. (1993). The empire of civil society: a critique of the realist theory of international relations. Verso.

Roy E. Jones. (1981). The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure. Review of International Studies, 7(1), 1–13. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20096900?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Rupert, M. (2000). The hegemonic project of liberal globalization [Electronic resource]. In Ideologies of globalization: contending visions of a new world order. Routledge. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10017826

Rupert, M. (2013). Marxism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Russett, B. (2013). Liberalism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Said, E. W. (2003). Orientalism: Vol. Penguin classics. Penguin.

Sayer, D. (1991). Capitalism and modernity: an excursus on Marx and Weber. Routledge.

Schmidt, B. (2002). On the history and historiography of international relations. In Handbook of international relations. SAGE. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039446880002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Schmidt, B. C. (1998). The political discourse of anarchy: a disciplinary history of international relations: Vol. SUNY series in global politics. State University of New York Press.

Schwarzenberger, G. (1964). Power politics: a study of world society: Vol. Library of world affairs (3rd ed). Stevens.

Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Penguin.

Seth, S. (2013). Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction: Vol. Interventions. Routledge.

Shampa Biswas. (2001a). ‘Nuclear Apartheid’ as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Resource? Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 26(4), 485–522. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40645031?sid=21106238578533&uid=3738032&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4

Shampa Biswas. (2001b). ‘Nuclear Apartheid’ as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Resource? Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 26(4), 485–522. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40645031?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Shapcott, R. (2008). Critical Theory. In The Oxford handbook of international relations: Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press.

Shapiro, M. J., & Der Derian, J. (1989a). International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics: Vol. Issues in world politics. Lexington Books.

Shapiro, M. J., & Der Derian, J. (1989b). International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics: Vol. Issues in world politics. Lexington Books.

Shepherd, L. J., & Hamilton, C. (2022). Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations (3rd ed). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=6156599790002418&amp;institutionId=2418&amp;customerId=2415

Shilliam, R. (2011). International relations and non-western thought: imperialism, colonialism, and investigations of global modernity: Vol. Interventions. Routledge. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037254390002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Simmons, B., & Martin, L. (2002). Chapter. In Handbook of international relations. SAGE. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039358920002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Sjoberg, L. (2010). Gender and international security: feminist perspectives: Vol. Routledge critical security studies series. Routledge.

Sjoberg, L., Gentry, C. E., & ebrary, Inc. (2011). Women, gender, and terrorism: Vol. Studies in security and international affairs [Electronic resource]. University of Georgia Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10508843

Smith, M. J. (1986). Realist thought from Weber to Kissinger: Vol. Political traditions in foreign policy series. Louisiana State University Press.

Smith, S. (1987). Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 16(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298870160022501

Smith, S. (1992). The Forty Years’ Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 21(3), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030301

Smith, S. (1995). Ten Self-Images of the Discipline: A genealogy of International Relations Theory. In International relations theory today. Polity Press.

Smith, S. (2002). The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: ‘Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline’. International Studies Review, 4(2), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00255

Smith, S. (2004). Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11. Presidential Address to the International Studies Association, February 27, 2003, Portland, OR. International Studies Quarterly, 48(3), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.t01-1-00312.x

Smith, S. (2013). Introduction. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996a). International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996b). International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

SMITH, STEVE. (2000). Power and truth; a reply to William Wallace. Review of International Studies, 23(04), 507–516. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=33515&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S026021059700507X

Spegele, R. D. (1996). Political realism in international theory: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Steans, J. (1998). Gender and international relations: an introduction. Polity.

Sterling-Folker, J. (2013a). Chapter 6. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Sterling-Folker, J. (2013b). Neo-Liberalism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Sterling-Folker, J. (2014). All Hail to the Chief: Liberal IR Theory in the New World Order. International Studies Perspectives, n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12089

Suganami, H. (n.d.). The international society perspective on world politics reconsidered’, International relations of the Asia-Pacific. http://irap.oxfordjournals.org/content/2/1/1.full.pdf

Sutch, P. (2001). Ethics, justice, and international relations: constructing an international community: Vol. Routledge advances in international relations and politics. Routledge.

Sylvester, C. & ebrary, Inc. (2002). Feminist international relations: an unfinished journey: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10006827

Tan, K.-C. (2004). Justice without borders: cosmopolitanism, nationalism, and patriotism: Vol. Contemporary political theory [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780511316609

Ted Hopf. (1998a). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23(1), 171–200. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539267?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Ted Hopf. (1998b). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23(1), 171–200. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539267?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

TESCHKE, B. (2002). Theorizing the Westphalian System of States: International Relations from Absolutism to Capitalism. European Journal of International Relations, 8(1), 5–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008001001

Teschke, B. (2008). Marxism. In The Oxford handbook of international relations: Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press.

Teschke, B. (2009). The myth of 1648: class, geopolitics, and the making of modern international relations (1st pbk. ed). Verso.

The false promise of international institutions. (n.d.-a). http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0021.pdf

The False Promise of International Institutions. (n.d.-b). International Security, 19(3), 5–49. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/summary/v019/19.3.mearsheimer.html

Tickner, A. B., & Wæver, O. (2009). International relations: scholarship around the world: Vol. Worlding beyond the West. Routledge.

Tickner, J. A. (1997). You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 611–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00060

Tickner, J. A. (1999). Why Women Can’t Run the World: International Politics According to Francis Fukuyama. International Studies Review, 1(3), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00162

Tickner, J. A. (2001). Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. Columbia University Press.

Tickner, J. A., & Sjoberg, L. (2010). Feminism. In International relations theories: discipline and diversity (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.

Tickner, J. A., & Sjoberg, L. (2013). Feminism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Toni Erskine. (2013b). Normative IR Theory. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds), International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

True, J. (2009). Feminism. In Theories of international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.

Various. (n.d.). Forum on English School. Review of International Studies. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=RIS&volumeId=27&seriesId=0&issueId=03

Vasquez, J. A. & ebrary, Inc. (1998). The power of power politics: from classical realism to neotraditionalism: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations ([New ed., enl.]) [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=5005948

Véronique Pin-Fat. (2005). The Metaphysics of the National Interest and the ‘Mysticism’ of the Nation-State: Reading Hans J. Morgenthau. Review of International Studies, 31(2), 217–236. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40072094?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Vincent, R. J. (1974). Nonintervention and international order. Princeton University Press.

Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (1998). Pluralism: decisionmaking, transnationalism and interdependence. In International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism (3rd ed). Allyn and Bacon.

Waever, O. (n.d.). The sociology of not so international discipline. International Organization. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=173292&jid=INO&volumeId=52&issueId=04&aid=173291

WAeVER, O. (1992). International Society -- Theoretical Promises Unfulfilled? Cooperation and Conflict, 27(1), 97–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836792027001004

Waever, O. (1996). The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Walker, R. B. J. (1993a). Inside/outside: international relations as political theory: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Walker, R. B. J. (1993b). Inside/outside: international relations as political theory: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Walker, R. B. J. (2010). After the globe, before the world: Vol. Global horizons. Routledge.

Waltz, K. (1986). Reflections on theory of international politics. In Neorealism and its critics: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill.

Waltz, K. N. (2001). Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037243280002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Walzer, M. (1985). Spheres of justice: a defence of pluralism and equality. Blackwell.

Walzer, M. (1994). Thick and thin: moral agrument at home and abroad. University of Notre Dame Press.

Weber, C. (1994). Good Girls, Little Girls, and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 23(2), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298940230021401

Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Wendt, A. (2003). Why a World State is Inevitable. European Journal of International Relations, 9(4), 491–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/135406610394001

Wendt, A. E. (1987). The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization, 41(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002751X

Wight, C. (2002). Chapter ‘Philosophy of science and international relations’. In Handbook of international relations. SAGE. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039446840002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

Wight, M. (1966). Why is there no international theory. In Diplomatic investigations: essays in the theory of international politics. Allen & Unwin.

Wight, M. (1977). Systems of states. Leicester University Press.

Wight, M. (1995). Why is there no International Theory? In International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.

Wight, M., Wight, G., & Porter, B. (2005). Four seminal thinkers in international theory: Machiavelli, Grotius, Kant, and Mazzini. Oxford University Press.

Wight, M., Wight, G., Porter, B., & Royal Institute of International Affairs. (1991a). International theory: the three traditions. Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

Wight, M., Wight, G., Porter, B., & Royal Institute of International Affairs. (1991b). International theory: the three traditions. Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

WILLIAMS, M. C. (2001). The Discipline of the Democratic Peace:: Kant, Liberalism and the Social Construction of Security Communities. European Journal of International Relations, 7(4), 525–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066101007004006

Williams, M. C. (2005). The realist tradition and the limits of international relations: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Williams, M. C. & ebrary, Inc. (2007a). Realism reconsidered: the legacy of Hans Morgenthau in international relations [Electronic resource]. In Hans Morgenthau and the world state revisited. Oxford University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10212228

Williams, M. C. & ebrary, Inc. (2007b). Realism reconsidered: the legacy of Hans Morgenthau in international relations [Electronic resource]. In Morgenthau now. Oxford University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10212228

Wilson, Peter. (2001a). The myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies, 24(05), 1–16. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=71437&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210598000011

Wilson, Peter. (2001b). The myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies, 24(05), 1–16. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=71437&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210598000011

Winch, P. (1990). The idea of a social science: and its relation to philosophy ; second edition (2nd ed). Routledge.

Wolfers, A. (1965). Statesmanship and moral choice. In Discord and collaboration: essays on international politics. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Woods, N. (1996). ch 1. In Explaining international relations since 1945. Oxford University Press.

Wyn Jones, R. (2001). Critical theory and world politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Zalewski, M. (2013). Feminist international relations: exquisite corpse. Routledge.

ZEHFUSS, M. (2001). Constructivism and Identity:: A Dangerous Liaison. European Journal of International Relations, 7(3), 315–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066101007003002

Zehfuss, M. (2002). Constructivism in international relations: the politics of reality: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780511330087

Zehfuss, M. (2014). Conclusion [Electronic resource]. In Global politics: a new introduction (Second edition). Routledge. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039368620002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415