1.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
2.
Burchill S. Theories of International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
3.
Linklater A. International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science. Routledge; 2000.
4.
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2008.
5.
Carlsnaes W, Simmons BA, Risse-Kappen T. Handbook of International Relations. SAGE; 2002. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037238880002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
6.
Der Derian J. International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
7.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
8.
Booth K, Smith S. International Relations Theory Today. Polity Press; 1995.
9.
Bull H. Chapter 8: The Theory of International Politics. In: International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
10.
Cox M, Dunne T, Booth K. Empires, Systems and States: Great Transformations in International Politics. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
11.
Halliday F. Chapter 11: The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
12.
Der Derian J. International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
13.
Holsti K. The study of International Relations During the Cold War. Review of International Studies. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=71442&jid=RIS&volumeId=24&issueId=05&aid=71441
14.
Little R. Growing Relevance of Pluralism. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
15.
Kahler M. Inventing International Relations. In: New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Westview Press; 1997.
16.
Nicholson M. Continued Significance of Positivism? In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
17.
Rosenau J. Probing puzzles persistently. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
18.
Smith S. Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11. Presidential Address to the International Studies Association, February 27, 2003, Portland, OR. International Studies Quarterly. 2004;48(3):499-515. doi:10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.t01-1-00312.x
19.
Smith S. Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1987;16(2):189-206. doi:10.1177/03058298870160022501
20.
Smith S. The Forty Years’ Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1992;21(3):489-506. doi:10.1177/03058298920210030301
21.
Waever O. The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
22.
Smith S. Ten Self-Images of the Discipline: A genealogy of International Relations Theory. In: International Relations Theory Today. Polity Press; 1995.
23.
Waever O. The sociology of not so international discipline. International Organization. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=173292&jid=INO&volumeId=52&issueId=04&aid=173291
24.
Hollis M, Smith S. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Clarendon Press; 1990.
25.
Kurki M, Wight C. International Relations as a Social Science. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
26.
Jackson PT. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Vol The new international relations. Routledge; 2011. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203843321
27.
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2008.
28.
Schmidt B. On the history and historiography of international relations. In: Handbook of International Relations. SAGE; 2002. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039446880002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
29.
Booth K, Dunne T. Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order. Palgrave; 2002.
30.
Booth K, Smith S. International Relations Theory Today. Polity Press; 1995.
31.
Brown C, Ainley K. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
32.
Clark I. Globalization and International Relations Theory. Oxford University Press; 1999.
33.
Carlsnaes W, Simmons BA, Risse-Kappen T. Handbook of International Relations. SAGE; 2002. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037243300002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
34.
Cox M, Booth K, Dunne T. The Interregnum: Controversies in World Politics 1989-1999. New York; 1999.
35.
Der Derian J. International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
36.
Booth K, Cox M, Dunne T. The Eighty Years’ Crisis: International Relations 1919-1999. Cambridge University Press; 1998.
37.
Ehlstain JB. International Politics and Political Theory. In: International Relations Theory Today. Polity Press; 1995.
38.
Halliday F. Chapter 1. In: Rethinking International Relations. Macmillan; 1994.
39.
Holsti KJ. The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Allen & Unwin; 1985.
40.
Jackson R. Is there a classical international theory? In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
41.
Katzenstein PJ, Keohane RO, Krasner SD. Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics. MIT Press; 1999.
42.
Knutsen TL. A History of International Relations Theory. 2nd ed. Manchester University Press; 1997.
43.
Morgenthau H. The intellectual and political foundations of a theory of international relations. In: International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
44.
Nicholson M. Causes and Consequences in International Relations: A Conceptual Study. Pinter; 1996.
45.
Pin-Fat V. How do we begin to think about the world? In: Global Politics: A New Introduction. Second edition. Routledge; 2014. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039312480002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
46.
Schmidt BC. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Vol SUNY series in global politics. State University of New York Press; 1998.
47.
Kauppi MV, Viotti PR. Chapter 1. In: International Relations Theory. Sixth edition. Rowman & Littlefield; 2020. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9781538115701
48.
Wight M. Why is there no international theory. In: Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. Allen & Unwin; 1966.
49.
Woods N. ch 1. In: Explaining International Relations since 1945. Oxford University Press; 1996.
50.
Zehfuss M. Conclusion. In: Global Politics: A New Introduction. Second edition. Routledge; 2014. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039368620002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
51.
Andreas Osiander. Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited. International Studies Quarterly. 1998;42(3):409-432. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600745?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
52.
Wilson, Peter. The myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies. 2001;24(05):1-16. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=71437&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210598000011
53.
Lucian M. Ashworth. Where Are the Idealists in Interwar International Relations? Review of International Studies. 2006;32(2):291-308. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40072139?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
54.
Carr EH, Cox M. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Palgrave; 2001.
55.
Mannheim K. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. Vol Routledge paperbacks. Routledge & K.Paul; 1960.
56.
Navari C. The Great illusion Revisited: The International theory of Norman Angell. Review of International Studies. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=6280224&jid=RIS&volumeId=15&issueId=04&aid=6280216
57.
D. J. Markwell. Sir Alfred Zimmern Revisited: Fifty Years On. Review of International Studies. 1986;12(4):279-292. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097090?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
58.
David Long. J. A. Hobson and Idealism in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 1991;17(3):285-304. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097263?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
59.
Long D, Wilson P. Thinkers of The Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed. Clarendon Press; 1995.
60.
Lebow N. Classical Realism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
61.
Donnelly J. Realism. In: Theories of International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
62.
BAIN, WILLIAM. Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered. Review of International Studies. 2000;26(03):445-464. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=54165&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210500004459
63.
Véronique Pin-Fat. The Metaphysics of the National Interest and the ‘Mysticism’ of the Nation-State: Reading Hans J. Morgenthau. Review of International Studies. 2005;31(2):217-236. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40072094?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
64.
COZETTE M. Reclaiming the critical dimension of realism: Hans J. Morgenthau on the ethics of scholarship. Review of International Studies. 2008;34(01). doi:10.1017/S0260210508007882
65.
Williams MC, ebrary, Inc. Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations. Oxford University Press; 2007. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10212228
66.
Aron R, Draus F, Shils E. History, Truth, Liberty: Selected Writings of Raymond Aron. University of Chicago Press; 1985.
67.
Buzan B. Timeless Wisdom of Realism? In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
68.
Craig C. Glimmer of a New Leviathan: Total War in the Realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. Columbia University Press; 2007.
69.
Carr EH, Cox M. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Palgrave; 2001.
70.
Carr EH. Conditions of Peace. Macmillan; 1942.
71.
Haslam J. No Virtue like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations since Machiavelli. Yale University Press; 2002.
72.
Morgenthau HJ, Thompson KW, Clinton WD. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2005.
73.
Morgenthau HJ. The Purpose of American Politics. Knopf; 1960.
74.
Morgenthau HJ. The Decline of Democratic Politics. Vol Politics in the twentieth century. University of Chicago Press; 1962.
75.
Morgenthau HJ. American Foreign Policy: A Critical Examination. Methuen; 1952.
76.
Morgenthau HJ. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. The University of Chicago press; 1946.
77.
Kennan GF. American Diplomacy, 1900-1950. Secker & Warburg; 1952.
78.
Alan James. The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 1989;15(3):215-229. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097183?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
79.
Kennan G. Morality and Foreign Policy | Foreign Affairs. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/40521/george-f-kennan/morality-and-foreign-policy
80.
Niebuhr R. The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness: A Vindication of Democracy and a Critique of Its Traditional Defense. University of Chicago Press edition. University of Chicago Press; 2011.
81.
Niebuhr R. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. S.C.M.Press; 1963.
82.
Pin-Fat V. Universality, Ethics and International Relations: A Grammatical Reading. Vol Interventions. Routledge; 2010.
83.
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2008.
84.
Smith MJ. Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger. Vol Political traditions in foreign policy series. Louisiana State University Press; 1986.
85.
Clinton WD, ebrary, Inc. The Realist Tradition and Contemporary International Relations. Vol Political traditions in foreign policy. Louisiana State University Press; 2007. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10297284
86.
Spegele RD. Political Realism in International Theory. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
87.
Vasquez JA, ebrary, Inc. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. [New ed., enl.]. Cambridge University Press; 1998. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=5005948
88.
Waltz KN. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press; 2001. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037243280002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
89.
Schwarzenberger G. Power Politics: A Study of World Society. Vol Library of world affairs. 3rd ed. Stevens; 1964.
90.
Wolfers A. Statesmanship and moral choice. In: Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Johns Hopkins University Press; 1965.
91.
Williams MC. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
92.
Williams MC, ebrary, Inc. Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations. Oxford University Press; 2007. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10212228
93.
Booth K. Realism and World Politics. Routledge; 2011.
94.
Donnelly J, ebrary, Inc. Realism and International Relations. Vol Themes in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2000. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=2000672
95.
Nardin T, Mapel DR. Traditions of International Ethics. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1992.
96.
Lebow RN. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge University Press; 2008. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037264560002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
97.
Lebow RN. The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests, and Orders. Cambridge University Press; 2003. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037307740002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
98.
Robert Gilpin. The richness of the tradition of political realism. In: Neorealism and Its Critics. Vol New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press; 1986.
99.
George J. Realist ‘Ethics’, International Relations, and Post-modernism: Thinking Beyond the Egoism-Anarchy Thematic. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1995;24(2):195-223. doi:10.1177/03058298950240020301
100.
Mearsheimer J. Structural Realism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
101.
Donnelly J. Realism. In: Theories of International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
102.
Waltz K. Reflections on theory of international politics. In: Neorealism and Its Critics. Vol New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press; 1986.
103.
Craig C. Glimmer of a New Leviathan: Total War in the Realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. Columbia University Press; 2007.
104.
Buzan B, Jones CA, Little R. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. Vol New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press; 1993.
105.
Mearsheimer JJ. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton & Co; 2001.
106.
Waltz KN. Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill; 1979.
107.
The false promise of international institutions. http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0021.pdf
108.
Mearsheimer J. Back to the future. http://aspire.aber.ac.uk/ui/forms/bookmarklet.html?fast=true&promptForBookmarkButtonUpdate=true&title=&uri=http%253A%252F%252Fmearsheimer.uchicago.edu%252Fpdfs%252FA0017.pdf
109.
Mearsheimer J. Back to the Future. http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0017.pdf
110.
HALLIDAY, FRED; ROSENBERG, JUSTIN. Interview with Ken Waltz CONDUCTED BY FRED HALLIDAY AND JUSTIN ROSENBERG. Review of International Studies. 2000;24(03):371-386. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=33595&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210598003714
111.
Keohane RO. Neorealism and Its Critics. Vol New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press; 1986.
112.
Halliday F. Rethinking International Relations. Macmillan; 1994.
113.
Linklater A. Neorealism in theory and practice. In: International Relations Theory Today. Polity Press; 1995.
114.
George J. ch 5. In: Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Lynne Rienner Publishers; 1994.
115.
Friedrich Kratochwil. The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik without Politics. Review of International Studies. 1993;19(1):63-80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097320?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
116.
Richard K. Ashley. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization. 1984;38(2):225-286. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
117.
Mearsheimer J, Walt S. An Unnecessary War. http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0032.pdf
118.
Buzan B. The timeless wisdom of realism? In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
119.
Donnelly J, ebrary, Inc. Realism and International Relations. Vol Themes in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2000. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=2000672
120.
Keohane RO. Neorealism and Its Critics. Vol New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press; 1986.
121.
Gilpin R. The richness of the tradition of political realism. In: Neorealism and Its Critics. Vol New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press; 1986.
122.
Donnelly J. Twentieth century realism. In: Traditions of International Ethics. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1992.
123.
Clinton WD, ebrary, Inc. The Realist Tradition and Contemporary International Relations. Vol Political traditions in foreign policy. Louisiana State University Press; 2007. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10297284
124.
Dunne T. English School. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
125.
Linklater A. The English School. In: Theories of International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
126.
Bull H. Society and anarchy in international relations. In: International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
127.
Linklater A, Suganami H. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge University Press; 2006. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780511314704
128.
Bull H. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Fourth edition. (Hoffmann S, Hurrell A, eds). Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=4606254720002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
129.
Alderson K, Hurrell A, ebrary, Inc. Hedley Bull on International Society. Macmillan; 2000. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=5007593
130.
Bull H. Justice in international relations, Hagey lectures. In: Hedley Bull on International Society. Macmillan; 2000. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=5007593
131.
Bull H, Kingsbury B, Roberts A. Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Clarendon; 1990.
132.
Bull H, Watson A. The Expansion of International Society. Clarendon; 1984.
133.
Butterfield H. Diplomatic Investigations. (Butterfield H, Wright M, eds). Oxford University Press; 2019. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=4776381570002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
134.
Buzan B, ebrary, Inc. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2004. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10124685
135.
Bellamy AJ. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press; 2005. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780191532702
136.
Chris Brown. International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way? Review of International Studies. 1995;21(2):183-196. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097405?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
137.
Barry Buzan. From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School. International Organization. 1993;47(3):327-352. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706979?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
138.
Clark I. Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford University Press; 2005. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780191531668
139.
Dunne T. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Vol St. Antony’s series. Macmillan Press Ltd; 1998.
140.
Various. Forum on English School. Review of International Studies. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=RIS&volumeId=27&seriesId=0&issueId=03
141.
Jackson RH. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford University Press; 2000. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780191522604
142.
Rengger NJ, ebrary, Inc. International Relations, Political Theory, and the Problem of Order: Beyond International Relations Theory? Vol The New international relations. Routledge; 2000. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10017509
143.
Vincent RJ. Nonintervention and International Order. Princeton University Press; 1974.
144.
Wight M, Wight G, Porter B. Four Seminal Thinkers in International Theory: Machiavelli, Grotius, Kant, and Mazzini. Oxford University Press; 2005.
145.
Wight M. Systems of States. Leicester University Press; 1977.
146.
Wight M, Wight G, Porter B, Royal Institute of International Affairs. International Theory: The Three Traditions. Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs; 1991.
147.
Jackson RH. Martin Wight, International Theory and the Good Life. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1990;19(2):261-272. doi:10.1177/03058298900190020901
148.
Nicholas J. Wheeler and Timothy Dunne. Hedley Bull’s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 1996;72(1):91-107. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2624751?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
149.
Suganami H. The international society perspective on world politics reconsidered’, International relations of the Asia-Pacific. http://irap.oxfordjournals.org/content/2/1/1.full.pdf
150.
Copeland D. A Realist critique of the English School. Review of International Studies. 2003;29(03). doi:10.1017/S0260210503004273
151.
EDKINS J, ZEHFUSS M. Generalising the international. Review of International Studies. 2005;31(03). doi:10.1017/S0260210505006583
152.
Halliday F. International society as homogeneity. In: Rethinking International Relations. Macmillan; 1994.
153.
Roy E. Jones. The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure. Review of International Studies. 1981;7(1):1-13. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20096900?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
154.
WAeVER O. International Society -- Theoretical Promises Unfulfilled? Cooperation and Conflict. 1992;27(1):97-128. doi:10.1177/0010836792027001004
155.
DUNNE T. International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled? Cooperation and Conflict. 1995;30(2):125-154. doi:10.1177/0010836795030002002
156.
Russett B. Liberalism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
157.
Sterling-Folker J. Neo-Liberalism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
158.
Michael W. Doyle. Liberalism and World Politics. The American Political Science Review. 1986;80(4):1151-1169. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1960861?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
159.
Sterling-Folker J. All Hail to the Chief: Liberal IR Theory in the New World Order. International Studies Perspectives. Published online November 2014:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/insp.12089
160.
Viotti PR, Kauppi MV. Pluralism: decisionmaking, transnationalism and interdependence. In: International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism. 3rd ed. Allyn and Bacon; 1998.
161.
Long D, Wilson P, Navari C. Thinkers of The Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed. Clarendon Press; 1995.
162.
Fukuyama F. The End of History and the Last Man. [Updated edition]. Penguin Books; 2020. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5838429480002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
163.
Kant I. Perpetual peace. In: Kant: Political Writings. Vol Cambridge texts in the history of political thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 1991.
164.
Kegley CW. Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge. St. Martin’s Press; 1995.
165.
ARCHIBUGI D. Immanuel Kant, Cosmopolitan Law and Peace. European Journal of International Relations. 1995;1(4):429-456. doi:10.1177/1354066195001004002
166.
Archibugi D, Held D. Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order. Polity Press; 1995.
167.
Barkawi T. War inside the free world. In: Democracy, Liberalism, and War: Rethinking the Democratic Peace Debate. Vol Critical security studies. Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2001.
168.
CAVALLAR G. Kantian perspectives on democratic peace: alternatives to Doyle. Review of International Studies. 2001;27(02). doi:10.1017/S0260210500002291
169.
Cox M, Ikenberry GJ, Inoguchi T. American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts. Oxford University Press; 2000.
170.
Doyle MW. Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. 1st ed. Norton; 1997.
171.
Antonio Franceschet. Sovereignty and Freedom: Immanuel Kant’s Liberal Internationalist ‘Legacy’. Review of International Studies. 2001;27(2):209-228. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097728?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
172.
Mark F. N. Franke. Immanuel Kant and the (Im)Possibility of International Relations Theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 1995;20(3):279-322. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644836?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
173.
Hutchings K, ebrary, Inc. Kant, Critique and Politics. Routledge; 1996. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10017133
174.
John Macmillan. Democracies Don’t Fight: A Case of the Wrong Research Agenda? Review of International Studies. 1996;22(3):275-299. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097449?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
175.
Onuf N, Johnson T. Peace in the liberal world: does democracy matter? In: Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge. St. Martin’s Press; 1995.
176.
Nardin T, Mapel DR. Traditions of International Ethics. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1992.
177.
WILLIAMS MC. The Discipline of the Democratic Peace:: Kant, Liberalism and the Social Construction of Security Communities. European Journal of International Relations. 2001;7(4):525-553. doi:10.1177/1354066101007004006
178.
Halliday F. Rethinking International Relations. Macmillan; 1994.
179.
Simmons B, Martin L. Chapter. In: Handbook of International Relations. SAGE; 2002. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039358920002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
180.
Baldwin DA. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Vol New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press; 1993.
181.
Keohane RO, Nye JS. Power and Interdependence. Vol Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown series in political science. 2nd ed. Scott, Foresman; 1989.
182.
Robert O. Keohane. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly. 1988;32(4):379-396. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600589
183.
Robert O. Keohane and Lisa L. Martin. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security. 1995;20(1):39-51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539214?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
184.
Joseph M. Grieco. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization. 1988;42(3):485-507. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
185.
Long D. The Harvard School of Liberal International Theory: A Case for Closure. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1995;24(3):489-505. doi:10.1177/03058298950240031201
186.
Mearsheimer J. The false promise of international institutions. International Security 19 (3) 1994/5. http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0021.pdf
187.
Fierke K. Constructivism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
188.
Reus-Smit C. Constructivism. In: Theories of International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
189.
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. Constructivism and its Ethics. In: The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2008.
190.
Alexander Wendt. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 1992;46(2):391-425. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
191.
Wendt AE. The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization. 1987;41(03). doi:10.1017/S002081830002751X
192.
Wendt A. Why a World State is Inevitable. European Journal of International Relations. 2003;9(4):491-542. doi:10.1177/135406610394001
193.
Wendt A. Social Theory of International Politics. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1999.
194.
Alexander Wendt. Constructing International Politics. International Security. 1995;20(1):71-81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
195.
Guzzini S, Leander A. Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics. Vol New international relations. Routledge; 2006.
196.
Guzzini S, Leander A. Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics. Vol New international relations. Routledge; 2006.
197.
Zehfuss M. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2002. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780511330087
198.
Alexander Wendt. Constructing International Politics. International Security. 1995;20(1):71-81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
199.
Forum on <em>Social Theory of International Politics</em>. Review of International Studies. 2000;26(01):123-124. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=33419&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210500001236
200.
Ted Hopf. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 1998;23(1):171-200. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539267?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
201.
John Gerard Ruggie. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization. 1998;52(4):855-885. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601360?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
202.
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization. 1998;52(4):887-917. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
203.
Audie Klotz. Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions Against South Africa. International Organization. 1995;49(3):451-478. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706905?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
204.
Lebow RN, Risse-Kappen T. International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War. Columbia University Press; 1995.
205.
Adler E, Barnett MN. Security Communities. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1998.
206.
Keck ME, Sikkink K. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press; 1998. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037307730002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
207.
Biersteker TJ, Weber C. State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
208.
Katzenstein PJ. Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan. Cornell University Press; 1998.
209.
Nina Tannenwald. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use. International Organization. 1999;53(3):433-468. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601286
210.
ZEHFUSS M. Constructivism and Identity:: A Dangerous Liaison. European Journal of International Relations. 2001;7(3):315-348. doi:10.1177/1354066101007003002
211.
Kubálková V, Onuf NG, Kowert P. International Relations in a Constructed World. M.E. Sharpe; 1998.
212.
Hurrell A. Chapter ‘Norms and Ethics in International relations’ in Handbook of international relations. In: Handbook of International Relations. SAGE; 2002. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039446850002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
213.
Searle JR. The Construction of Social Reality. Penguin; 1995.
214.
Winch P. The Idea of a Social Science: And Its Relation to Philosophy ; Second Edition. 2nd ed. Routledge; 1990.
215.
Wight C. Chapter ‘Philosophy of science and international relations’. In: Handbook of International Relations. SAGE; 2002. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039446840002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
216.
Hollis M. The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press; 1994.
217.
Collin F. Theory and Understanding: A Critique of Interpretive Social Science. Blackwell; 1985.
218.
Rupert M. Marxism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
219.
Linklater A. Marx and Marxism. In: Theories of International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
220.
Teschke B. Marxism. In: The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2008.
221.
TESCHKE B. Theorizing the Westphalian System of States: International Relations from Absolutism to Capitalism. European Journal of International Relations. 2002;8(1):5-48. doi:10.1177/1354066102008001001
222.
Marx K, Engels F. Bourgeois and Proletarians. In: The Communist Manifesto. Vol Get political. New ed. Pluto Press; 2008. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039312470002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
223.
Edkins J, Vaughan-Williams N. Critical Theorists and International Relations. Routledge; 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203881842
224.
Marx K, Engels F, Tucker RC. The Marx-Engels Reader. 2nd ed. Norton; 1978.
225.
Callinicos A. Actuality of imperialism. Millennium 31 (2) 2002. http://mil.sagepub.com/content/31/2/319.full.pdf
226.
Cox R. The point is not just to explain the world but to change it. In: The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2008.
227.
Gill S. New constitutionalism, democratisation and global political economy∗. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change. 1998;10(1):23-38. doi:10.1080/14781159808412845
228.
Cox RW. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1981;10(2):126-155. doi:10.1177/03058298810100020501
229.
Gill S. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1993.
230.
Rupert M. The hegemonic project of liberal globalization. In: Ideologies of Globalization: Contending Visions of a New World Order. Routledge; 2000. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10017826
231.
Maclean J. Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1988;17(2):295-319. doi:10.1177/03058298880170021201
232.
Kubálková V, Cruickshank AA. Marxism-Leninism and Theory of International Relations. Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1980.
233.
Davenport A. Marxism in IR: Condemned to a Realist fate? European Journal of International Relations. 2013;19(1):27-48. doi:10.1177/1354066111416021
234.
Rosenberg J. The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. Verso; 1993.
235.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
236.
Sayer D. Capitalism and Modernity: An Excursus on Marx and Weber. Routledge; 1991.
237.
Teschke B. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations. 1st pbk. ed. Verso; 2009.
238.
David L. Blaney and Naeem Inayatullah. The Westphalian Deferral. International Studies Review. 2000;2(2):29-64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186427?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
239.
Anievas A. Marxism and World Politics: Contesting Global Capitalism. Routledge; 2010.
240.
Bidet J, Kouvélakis E. Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism. Vol Historical materialism book series. Haymarket Books; 2009.
241.
Roach S. Critical Theory. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
242.
Jones RW. Locating Critical in Critical international Relations Theory. In: Critical Theory and World Politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2001.
243.
Linklater A. Achievements of Critical Theory. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
244.
Booth K. Three tyrannies. In: Human Rights in Global Politics. Cambridge University Press; 1999.
245.
Ken Booth. Security and Emancipation. Review of International Studies. 1991;17(4):313-326. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097269?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
246.
Linklater A. Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations. Macmillan; 1990.
247.
Linklater A. The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Polity; 1998.
248.
Hoffman M. Restructuring, Reconstruction, . Reinscription, Rearticulation: Four Voices in Critical International Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1991;20(2):169-185. doi:10.1177/03058298910200021001
249.
Hoffman M. Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1987;16(2):231-250. doi:10.1177/03058298870160022801
250.
Jahn B. One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1998;27(3):613-641. doi:10.1177/03058298980270030201
251.
PRICE R, REUS - SMIT C. Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations. 1998;4(3):259-294. doi:10.1177/1354066198004003001
252.
HUTCHINGS K. Happy Anniversary! Time and critique in International Relations theory. Review of International Studies. 2007;33(S1). doi:10.1017/S0260210507007401
253.
Wyn Jones R. Critical Theory and World Politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2001.
254.
Shapcott R. Critical Theory. In: The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2008.
255.
Kurki M. The Limitations of the Critical Edge: Reflections on Critical and Philosophical IR Scholarship Today. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2011;40(1):129-146. doi:10.1177/0305829811411997
256.
Campbell D. Poststructuralism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
257.
Edkins J. Poststructuralism. In: International Relations Theory for the Twenty-First Century: An Introduction. Routledge; 2007.
258.
Campbell D, ebrary, Inc. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Rev. ed. University of Minnesota Press; 1998. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10159576
259.
Campbell D, ebrary, Inc. National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity, and Justice in Bosnia. University of Minnesota Press; 1998. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10202555
260.
Shapiro MJ, Der Derian J. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Vol Issues in world politics. Lexington Books; 1989.
261.
Edkins J. Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2023.
262.
George J. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Lynne Rienner Publishers; 1994.
263.
Walker RBJ. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1993.
264.
Bartelson J. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1995.
265.
Dean M. Critical and Effective Histories: Foucault’s Methods and Historical Sociology. Routledge; 1994. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5429999310002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
266.
Hardt M, Negri A. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. Penguin; 2006.
267.
Hardt M, Negri A. Empire. Harvard University Press; 2001. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037307710002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
268.
Prozorov S, ebrary, Inc. Foucault, Freedom and Sovereignty. Ashgate; 2007. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10211498
269.
Walker RBJ. After the Globe, before the World. Vol Global horizons. Routledge; 2010.
270.
Campbell D, Shapiro MJ. Moral Spaces: Rethinking Ethics and World Politics. University of Minnesota Press; 1999.
271.
Ashley RK. Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1988;17(2):227-262. doi:10.1177/03058298880170020901
272.
Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker. Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly. 1990;34(3):259-268. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2600569?sid=21106237920623&uid=3738032&uid=4&uid=70&uid=2&uid=2129
273.
Edkins J. Legality with a Vengeance: Famines and Humanitarian Relief in ‘Complex Emergencies’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1996;25(3):547-575. doi:10.1177/03058298960250030501
274.
Edkins J. Ethics and Practices of Engagement: Intellectuals as Experts. International Relations. 2005;19(1):64-69. doi:10.1177/0047117805050062
275.
Huysmans J. Minding Exceptions: The Politics of Insecurity and Liberal Democracy. Contemporary Political Theory. 2004;3(3):321-341. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300137
276.
Edkins J, Pin-Fat V. Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2005;34(1):1-24. doi:10.1177/03058298050340010101
277.
PIN-FAT, VÉRONIQUE. (Im)possible universalism: reading human rights in world politics. Review of International Studies. 2001;26(04):663-674. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=62985
278.
Maja Zehfuss. Forget September 11. Third World Quarterly. 2003;24(3):513-528. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3993383?sid=21106237920623&uid=3738032&uid=4&uid=2&uid=2129&uid=70
279.
Grovogui SN. Sovereigns, Quasi Sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-Determination in International Law. Vol v. 3. 1st ed. University of Minnesota Press; 1996.
280.
Tickner JA, Sjoberg L. Feminism. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
281.
True J. Feminism. In: Theories of International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
282.
Sylvester C, ebrary, Inc. Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2002. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10006827
283.
Tickner JA. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41(4):611-632. doi:10.1111/1468-2478.00060
284.
Adam Jones. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 1996;22(4):405-429. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/20097459?sid=21106237920623&uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=2129
285.
CARVER, TERRELL; COCHRAN, MOLLY; SQUIRES, JUDITH. Gendering Jones: feminisms, IRs, masculinities. Review of International Studies. 2000;24(02):283-297. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=33581
286.
Keohane RO. Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory. International Studies Quarterly. 1998;42(1):193-197. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00076
287.
Halliday F. Rethinking International Relations. Macmillan; 1994.
288.
Peterson VS. Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1992;21(2):183-206. doi:10.1177/03058298920210020401
289.
Tickner JA. Why Women Can’t Run the World: International Politics According to Francis Fukuyama. International Studies Review. 1999;1(3):3-11. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.00162
290.
Keohane RO. International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1989;18(2):245-253. doi:10.1177/03058298890180021001
291.
Weber C. Good Girls, Little Girls, and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1994;23(2):337-349. doi:10.1177/03058298940230021401
292.
Enloe CH. Bananas, Beaches & Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics.
293.
Enloe CH. The Morning after: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. University of California Press; 1993.
294.
Steans J. Gender and International Relations: An Introduction. Polity; 1998.
295.
Sjoberg L, Gentry CE, ebrary, Inc. Women, Gender, and Terrorism. Vol Studies in security and international affairs. University of Georgia Press; 2011. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10508843
296.
Sjoberg L. Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives. Vol Routledge critical security studies series. Routledge; 2010.
297.
Tickner JA. Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era. Columbia University Press; 2001.
298.
Zalewski M. Feminist International Relations: Exquisite Corpse. Routledge; 2013.
299.
Shepherd LJ, Hamilton C. Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. 3rd ed. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2022. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=6156599790002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
300.
Biswas S. Postcolonialism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
301.
Abrahamsen R. Postcolonialism. In: International Relations Theory for the Twenty-First Century: An Introduction. Routledge; 2007.
302.
Bilgin P. Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly. 2008;29(1):5-23. doi:10.1080/01436590701726392
303.
Chowdhry G, Nair S. Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender and Class. Vol Routledge advances in international relations and global politics. Routledge; 2004.
304.
Krishna S. Globalization and Postcolonialism: Hegemony and Resistance in the Twenty-First Century. Rowman & Littlefield http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780742557642
305.
Ling LHM. Postcolonial International Relations: Conquest and Desire between Asia and the West. Vol International political economy series. Palgrave; 2002.
306.
Doty RL, ebrary, Inc. Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. Vol Borderlines. University of Minnesota Press; 1996. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10159633
307.
Escobar A, ebrary, Inc. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Vol Princeton studies in culture/power/history. Princeton University Press; 1995. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10031960
308.
Ferguson J. The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development,’ Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. University of Minnesota Press; 1994.
309.
Loomba A. Colonialism - Postcolonialism. Vol New critical idiom. 2nd. ed. Routledge; 2005. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203087596
310.
Darby P. At the Edge of International Relations: Postcolonialism, Gender and Dependency. Continuum; 2000.
311.
Riley R, Inayatullah N. Interrogating Imperialism: Conversations on Gender, Race, and War. Palgrave Macmillan; 2006. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780230601710
312.
Edkins J, Zehfuss M. Global Politics: A New Introduction. Second edition. Routledge; 2014. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203076897
313.
Edkins J, Zehfuss M. Global Politics: A New Introduction. Second edition. Routledge; 2014. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203076897
314.
Kate Manzo. Critical Humanism: Postcolonialism and Postmodern Ethics. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 1997;22(3):381-408. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40644896?sid=21106238545153&uid=2&uid=4&uid=70&uid=2129&uid=3738032
315.
Said EW. Orientalism. Vol Penguin classics. Penguin; 2003.
316.
Nelson C, Grossberg L. Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. University of Illinois Press; 1988.
317.
Shampa Biswas. ‘Nuclear Apartheid’ as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Resource? Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 2001;26(4):485-522. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40645031?sid=21106238578533&uid=3738032&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4
318.
Biswas S. Empire and Global Public Intellectuals: Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2007;36(1):117-133. doi:10.1177/03058298070360010801
319.
Bilgin P. Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly. 2008;29(1):5-23. doi:10.1080/01436590701726392
320.
Bilgin P. Looking for ‘the International’ beyond the West. Third World Quarterly. 2010;31(5):817-828. doi:10.1080/01436597.2010.502696
321.
Seth S. Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction. Vol Interventions. Routledge; 2013.
322.
Shilliam R. International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism, and Investigations of Global Modernity. Vol Interventions. Routledge; 2011. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037254390002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
323.
Nardin T. International Political Theory. In: Theories of International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
324.
Toni Erskine. Normative IR Theory. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
325.
Beitz CR, NetLibrary, Inc. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton University Press; 1999. http://www.netLibrary.com/urlapi.asp?action=summary&v=1&bookid=99680
326.
Booth K, Dunne T, Cox M. How Might We Live?: Global Ethics in a New Century. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
327.
Caney S. Justice beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford University Press; 2005.
328.
Frost M, Frost M. Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
329.
Hutchings K. Global Ethics: An Introduction. Polity; 2010.
330.
Linklater A. Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, Sovereignty and Humanity. Routledge; 2007.
331.
Linklater A, London School of Economics and Political Science. Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations. 2nd ed. Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics and Political Science; 1990.
332.
Miller D. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford University Press; 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780191528576
333.
Nardin T. Law, Morality, and the Relations of States. Princeton University Press; 1983.
334.
Sutch P. Ethics, Justice, and International Relations: Constructing an International Community. Vol Routledge advances in international relations and politics. Routledge; 2001.
335.
Tan KC. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Vol Contemporary political theory. Cambridge University Press; 2004. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780511316609
336.
Walzer M. Thick and Thin: Moral Agrument at Home and Abroad. University of Notre Dame Press; 1994.
337.
Walzer M. Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality. Blackwell; 1985.
338.
Linklater A. The Evolving Spheres of International Justice. International Affairs. 1999;75(3):473-482. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.00088
339.
O’NEILL O. Bounded and cosmopolitan justice. Review of International Studies. 2000;26(05). doi:10.1017/S0260210500000450
340.
Bain W. Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of Power. Oxford University Press; 2003.
341.
Beitz CR. Social and Cosmopolitan Liberalism. International Affairs. 1999;75(3):515-529. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.00091
342.
Brassett J, Bulley D. Ethics in World Politics: Cosmopolitanism and Beyond? International Politics. 2007;44(1):1-18. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800155
343.
Chris Brown. The House That Chuck Built: Twenty-Five Years of Reading Charles Beitz. Review of International Studies. 2005;31(2):371-379. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40072103?sid=21106238986013&uid=2&uid=4&uid=70&uid=3738032&uid=2129
344.
Wight M. Why is there no International Theory? In: International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
345.
Cox R. The point is not just to explain the World but to change It. In: The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2008.
346.
Dunne T, Hansen L, Wight C. The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations. 2013;19(3):405-425. doi:10.1177/1354066113495485
347.
Ferguson YH. Diversity in IR Theory: Pluralism as an Opportunity for Understanding Global Politics. International Studies Perspectives. 2015;16(1):3-12. doi:10.1111/insp.12092
348.
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2008.
349.
Smith S. The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: ‘Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline’. International Studies Review. 2002;4(2):67-85. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.00255
350.
Edkins J, Zehfuss M. Global Politics: A New Introduction. Second edition. Routledge; 2014. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203076897
351.
Bull H, Alderson K, Hurrell A, NetLibrary, Inc. Hedley Bull on International Society. Macmillan Press; 2000. http://www.netLibrary.com/urlapi.asp?action=summary&v=1&bookid=61053
352.
Collingwood RG. The Idea of History. Vol Oxford paperbacks. Oxford University Press; 1961.
353.
Edkins J. Trauma and the Memory of Politics. Cambridge University Press; 2003.
354.
Elman C, Elman MF. Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists, and the Study of International Relations. Vol BCSIA studies in international security. MIT Press; 2001.
355.
John Lewis Gaddis. International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War. International Security. 1993;17(3):5-58. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2539129?sid=21106239130283&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=3738032&uid=70&uid=4
356.
Hobson JM, ebrary, Inc. The State and International Relations. Vol Themes in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2000. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=2000778
357.
John M. Hobson. The Historical Sociology of the State and the State of Historical Sociology in International Relations. Review of International Political Economy. 1998;5(2):284-320. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4177267?sid=21106239150993&uid=2129&uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4
358.
Doyle MW, Ikenberry GJ. New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Westview Press; 1997.
359.
Neufeld MA. The Restructuring of International Relations Theory. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1995.
360.
Rengger NJ, ebrary, Inc. International Relations, Political Theory, and the Problem of Order: Beyond International Relations Theory? Vol The New international relations. Routledge; 2000. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10017509
361.
Wight M, Wight G, Porter B, Royal Institute of International Affairs. International Theory: The Three Traditions. Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs; 1991.
362.
Tickner AB, Wæver O. International Relations: Scholarship around the World. Vol Worlding beyond the West. Routledge; 2009.
363.
Shapiro MJ, Der Derian J. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Vol Issues in world politics. Lexington Books; 1989.
364.
Walker RBJ. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 1993.
365.
Smith S. Introduction. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
366.
Kurki M, Wight C. Chapter 1 of International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
367.
Dunne T, Hansen L, Wight C. The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations. 2013;19(3):405-425. doi:10.1177/1354066113495485
368.
Lebow N. Classical Realism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
369.
Andreas Osiander. Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited. International Studies Quarterly. 1998;42(3):409-432. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600745?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
370.
Wilson, Peter. The myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies. 2001;24(05):1-16. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=71437&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210598000011
371.
BAIN, WILLIAM. Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered. Review of International Studies. 2000;26(03):445-464. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=54165&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210500004459
372.
Mearsheimer J. Chapter 4. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
373.
Sterling-Folker J. Chapter 6. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
374.
Dunne T. Chapter 7. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
375.
Kenneth N. Waltz. Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security. 2000;25(1):5-41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
376.
Robert O. Keohane and Lisa L. Martin. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security. 1995;20(1):39-51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539214?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
377.
The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security. 19(3):5-49. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/summary/v019/19.3.mearsheimer.html
378.
Bull H. Society and Anarchy in International Relations. In: International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan; 1995.
379.
Fierke K. Constructivism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
380.
Alexander Wendt. Constructing International Politics. International Security. 1995;20(1):71-81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
381.
Alexander Wendt. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 1992;46(2):391-425. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
382.
Ted Hopf. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 1998;23(1):171-200. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539267?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
383.
Mark Rupert. Marxism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
384.
Gill S. New constitutionalism, democratisation and global political economy∗. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change. 1998;10(1):23-38. doi:10.1080/14781159808412845
385.
Cox R. Social Forces, States and World Orders. In: Neorealism and Its Critics. Vol New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press; 1986.
386.
Roach S. Critical Theory. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
387.
Campbell D. Poststructuralism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
388.
Ken Booth. Human Wrongs and International Relations. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 1995;71(1):103-126. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2624012?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
389.
Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker. Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly. 1990;34(3):259-268. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600569?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
390.
Kurki M. The Limitations of the Critical Edge: Reflections on Critical and Philosophical IR Scholarship Today. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2011;40(1):129-146. doi:10.1177/0305829811411997
391.
Grovogui S. Postcolonialism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
392.
Tickner JA, Sjoberg L. Feminism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
393.
Shampa Biswas. ‘Nuclear Apartheid’ as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Resource? Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 2001;26(4):485-522. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40645031?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
394.
J. Ann Tickner. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41(4):611-632. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
395.
Erskine T. Normative Theory. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2013.
396.
Nau H. Scholarship and policy-making: who speaks truth to whom? In: The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2008.
397.
SMITH, STEVE. Power and truth; a reply to William Wallace. Review of International Studies. 2000;23(04):507-516. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=33515&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S026021059700507X
398.
Review by: William Wallace. Review: Truth and Power, Monks and Technocrats: Theory and Practice in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 1996;22(3):301-321. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097450?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
399.
Ken Booth. Discussion: A Reply to Wallace. Review of International Studies. 1997;23(3):371-377. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097487?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
400.
Krishna S. Globalization and Postcolonialism: Hegemony and Resistance in the Twenty-First Century. Rowman & Littlefield https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shibboleth.aber.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780742557642
401.
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2008.
