1
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
2
Burchill S. Theories of international relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
3
Linklater A. International relations: critical concepts in political science. New York: Routledge 2000.
4
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
5
Carlsnaes W, Simmons BA, Risse-Kappen T. Handbook of international relations. London: SAGE 2002.
6
Der Derian J. International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1995.
7
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. International theory: positivism and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press 1996.
8
Booth K, Smith S. International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press 1995.
9
Bull H. Chapter 8: The Theory of International Politics. International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1995.
10
Cox M, Dunne T, Booth K. Empires, systems and states: great transformations in international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001.
11
Halliday F. Chapter 11: The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes. International theory: positivism and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press 1996.
12
Der Derian J. International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1995.
13
Holsti K. The study of International Relations During the Cold War. Review of International Studies.
14
Little R. Growing Relevance of Pluralism. International theory: positivism and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press 1996.
15
Kahler M. Inventing International Relations. New thinking in international relations theory. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press 1997.
16
Nicholson M. Continued Significance of Positivism? International theory: positivism and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press 1996.
17
Rosenau J. Probing puzzles persistently. International theory: positivism and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press 1996.
18
Smith S. Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11. Presidential Address to the International Studies Association, February 27, 2003, Portland, OR. International Studies Quarterly. 2004;48:499–515. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.t01-1-00312.x
19
Smith S. Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1987;16:189–206. doi: 10.1177/03058298870160022501
20
Smith S. The Forty Years’ Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1992;21:489–506. doi: 10.1177/03058298920210030301
21
Waever O. The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. International theory: positivism and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press 1996.
22
Smith S. Ten Self-Images of the Discipline: A genealogy of International Relations Theory. International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press 1995.
23
Waever O. The sociology of not so international discipline. International Organization.
24
Hollis M, Smith S. Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1990.
25
Kurki M, Wight C. International Relations as a Social Science. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
26
Jackson PT. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. London: Routledge 2011.
27
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
28
Schmidt B. On the history and historiography of international relations. Handbook of international relations. London: SAGE 2002.
29
Booth K, Dunne T. Worlds in collision: terror and the future of global order. Basingstoke: Palgrave 2002.
30
Booth K, Smith S. International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press 1995.
31
Brown C, Ainley K. Understanding international relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
32
Clark I. Globalization and international relations theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999.
33
Carlsnaes W, Simmons BA, Risse-Kappen T. Handbook of international relations. London: SAGE 2002.
34
Cox M, Booth K, Dunne T. The interregnum: controversies in world politics 1989-1999. Cambridge: New York 1999.
35
Der Derian J. International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1995.
36
Booth K, Cox M, Dunne T. The eighty years’ crisis: international relations 1919-1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998.
37
Ehlstain JB. International Politics and Political Theory. International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press 1995.
38
Halliday F. Chapter 1. Rethinking international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1994.
39
Holsti KJ. The dividing discipline: hegemony and diversity in international theory. Boston [Mass.]: Allen & Unwin 1985.
40
Jackson R. Is there a classical international theory? International theory: positivism and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press 1996.
41
Katzenstein PJ, Keohane RO, Krasner SD. Exploration and contestation in the study of world politics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 1999.
42
Knutsen TL. A history of international relations theory. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press 1997.
43
Morgenthau H. The intellectual and political foundations of a theory of international relations. International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1995.
44
Nicholson M. Causes and consequences in international relations: a conceptual study. New York: Pinter 1996.
45
Pin-Fat V. How do we begin to think about the world? Global politics: a new introduction. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 2014.
46
Schmidt BC. The political discourse of anarchy: a disciplinary history of international relations. Albany: State University of New York Press 1998.
47
Kauppi MV, Viotti PR. Chapter 1. International relations theory. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield 2020.
48
Wight M. Why is there no international theory. Diplomatic investigations: essays in the theory of international politics. London: Allen & Unwin 1966.
49
Woods N. ch 1. Explaining international relations since 1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1996.
50
Zehfuss M. Conclusion. Global politics: a new introduction. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 2014.
51
Andreas Osiander. Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited. International Studies Quarterly. 1998;42:409–32.
52
Wilson, Peter. The myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies. 2001;24:1–16.
53
Lucian M. Ashworth. Where Are the Idealists in Interwar International Relations? Review of International Studies. 2006;32:291–308.
54
Carr EH, Cox M. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave 2001.
55
Mannheim K. Ideology and Utopia: an introduction to the sociology of knowledge. Routledge & K.Paul 1960.
56
Navari C. The Great illusion Revisited: The International theory of Norman Angell. Review of International Studies.
57
D. J. Markwell. Sir Alfred Zimmern Revisited: Fifty Years On. Review of International Studies. 1986;12:279–92.
58
David Long. J. A. Hobson and Idealism in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 1991;17:285–304.
59
Long D, Wilson P. Thinkers of The twenty years’ crisis: inter-war idealism reassessed. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1995.
60
Lebow N. Classical Realism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
61
Donnelly J. Realism. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
62
BAIN, WILLIAM. Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered. Review of International Studies. 2000;26:445–64.
63
Véronique Pin-Fat. The Metaphysics of the National Interest and the ‘Mysticism’ of the Nation-State: Reading Hans J. Morgenthau. Review of International Studies. 2005;31:217–36.
64
COZETTE M. Reclaiming the critical dimension of realism: Hans J. Morgenthau on the ethics of scholarship. Review of International Studies. 2008;34. doi: 10.1017/S0260210508007882
65
Williams MC, ebrary, Inc. Realism reconsidered: the legacy of Hans Morgenthau in international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
66
Aron R, Draus F, Shils E. History, truth, liberty: selected writings of Raymond Aron. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1985.
67
Buzan B. Timeless Wisdom of Realism? International theory: positivism and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press 1996.
68
Craig C. Glimmer of a new Leviathan: total war in the realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. New York: Columbia University Press 2007.
69
Carr EH, Cox M. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave 2001.
70
Carr EH. Conditions of peace. London: Macmillan 1942.
71
Haslam J. No virtue like necessity: realist thought in international relations since Machiavelli. New Haven: Yale University Press 2002.
72
Morgenthau HJ, Thompson KW, Clinton WD. Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. 7th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education 2005.
73
Morgenthau HJ. The purpose of American politics. New York: Knopf 1960.
74
Morgenthau HJ. The decline of democratic politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1962.
75
Morgenthau HJ. American foreign policy: a critical examination. London: Methuen 1952.
76
Morgenthau HJ. Scientific man vs. power politics. Chicago, Ill: The University of Chicago press 1946.
77
Kennan GF. American diplomacy, 1900-1950. London: Secker & Warburg 1952.
78
Alan James. The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 1989;15:215–29.
79
Kennan G. Morality and Foreign Policy | Foreign Affairs. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/40521/george-f-kennan/morality-and-foreign-policy
80
Niebuhr R. The children of light and the children of darkness: a vindication of democracy and a critique of its traditional defense. University of Chicago Press edition. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press 2011.
81
Niebuhr R. Moral man and immoral society: a study in ethics and politics. London: S.C.M.Press 1963.
82
Pin-Fat V. Universality, ethics and international relations: a grammatical reading. London: Routledge 2010.
83
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
84
Smith MJ. Realist thought from Weber to Kissinger. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press 1986.
85
Clinton WD, ebrary, Inc. The realist tradition and contemporary international relations. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press 2007.
86
Spegele RD. Political realism in international theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.
87
Vasquez JA, ebrary, Inc. The power of power politics: from classical realism to neotraditionalism. [New ed., enl.]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 1998.
88
Waltz KN. Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press 2001.
89
Schwarzenberger G. Power politics: a study of world society. 3rd ed. Stevens 1964.
90
Wolfers A. Statesmanship and moral choice. Discord and collaboration: essays on international politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 1965.
91
Williams MC. The realist tradition and the limits of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005.
92
Williams MC, ebrary, Inc. Realism reconsidered: the legacy of Hans Morgenthau in international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
93
Booth K. Realism and world politics. London: Routledge 2011.
94
Donnelly J, ebrary, Inc. Realism and international relations. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press 2000.
95
Nardin T, Mapel DR. Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992.
96
Lebow RN. A cultural theory of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008.
97
Lebow RN. The Tragic vision of politics: ethics, interests, and orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003.
98
Robert Gilpin. The richness of the tradition of political realism. Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press 1986.
99
George J. Realist ‘Ethics’, International Relations, and Post-modernism: Thinking Beyond the Egoism-Anarchy Thematic. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1995;24:195–223. doi: 10.1177/03058298950240020301
100
Mearsheimer J. Structural Realism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
101
Donnelly J. Realism. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
102
Waltz K. Reflections on theory of international politics. Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press 1986.
103
Craig C. Glimmer of a new Leviathan: total war in the realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. New York: Columbia University Press 2007.
104
Buzan B, Jones CA, Little R. The logic of anarchy: neorealism to structural realism. New York: Columbia University Press 1993.
105
Mearsheimer JJ. The tragedy of Great Power politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Co 2001.
106
Waltz KN. Theory of international politics. London: McGraw-Hill 1979.
107
The false promise of international institutions.
108
Mearsheimer J. Back to the future.
109
Mearsheimer J. Back to the Future.
110
HALLIDAY, FRED; ROSENBERG, JUSTIN. Interview with Ken Waltz CONDUCTED BY FRED HALLIDAY AND JUSTIN ROSENBERG. Review of International Studies. 2000;24:371–86.
111
Keohane RO. Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press 1986.
112
Halliday F. Rethinking international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1994.
113
Linklater A. Neorealism in theory and practice. International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press 1995.
114
George J. ch 5. Discourses of global politics: a critical (re)introduction to international relations. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers 1994.
115
Friedrich Kratochwil. The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik without Politics. Review of International Studies. 1993;19:63–80.
116
Richard K. Ashley. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization. 1984;38:225–86.
117
Mearsheimer J, Walt S. An Unnecessary War.
118
Buzan B. The timeless wisdom of realism? International theory: positivism and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press 1996.
119
Donnelly J, ebrary, Inc. Realism and international relations. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press 2000.
120
Keohane RO. Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press 1986.
121
Gilpin R. The richness of the tradition of political realism. Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press 1986.
122
Donnelly J. Twentieth century realism. Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992.
123
Clinton WD, ebrary, Inc. The realist tradition and contemporary international relations. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press 2007.
124
Dunne T. English School. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
125
Linklater A. The English School. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
126
Bull H. Society and anarchy in international relations. International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1995.
127
Linklater A, Suganami H. The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006.
128
Bull H. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. Fourth edition. Basingstoke, [England]: Palgrave Macmillan 2012.
129
Alderson K, Hurrell A, ebrary, Inc. Hedley Bull on international society. Basingstoke: Macmillan 2000.
130
Bull H. Justice in international relations, Hagey lectures. Hedley Bull on international society. Basingstoke: Macmillan 2000.
131
Bull H, Kingsbury B, Roberts A. Hugo Grotius and international relations. Oxford: Clarendon 1990.
132
Bull H, Watson A. The Expansion of international society. Oxford: Clarendon 1984.
133
Butterfield H. Diplomatic investigations. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press 2019.
134
Buzan B, ebrary, Inc. From international to world society?: English school theory and the social structure of globalisation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 2004.
135
Bellamy AJ. International society and its critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005.
136
Chris Brown. International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way? Review of International Studies. 1995;21:183–96.
137
Barry Buzan. From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School. International Organization. 1993;47:327–52.
138
Clark I. Legitimacy in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005.
139
Dunne T. Inventing international society: a history of the English school. Basingstoke UK: Macmillan Press Ltd 1998.
140
Various. Forum on English School. Review of International Studies.
141
Jackson RH. The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.
142
Rengger NJ, ebrary, Inc. International relations, political theory, and the problem of order: beyond international relations theory? London: Routledge 2000.
143
Vincent RJ. Nonintervention and international order. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press 1974.
144
Wight M, Wight G, Porter B. Four seminal thinkers in international theory: Machiavelli, Grotius, Kant, and Mazzini. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005.
145
Wight M. Systems of states. Leicester: Leicester University Press 1977.
146
Wight M, Wight G, Porter B, et al. International theory: the three traditions. Leicester: Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs 1991.
147
Jackson RH. Martin Wight, International Theory and the Good Life. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1990;19:261–72. doi: 10.1177/03058298900190020901
148
Nicholas J. Wheeler and Timothy Dunne. Hedley Bull’s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 1996;72:91–107.
149
Suganami H. The international society perspective on world politics reconsidered’, International relations of the Asia-Pacific.
150
Copeland D. A Realist critique of the English School. Review of International Studies. 2003;29. doi: 10.1017/S0260210503004273
151
EDKINS J, ZEHFUSS M. Generalising the international. Review of International Studies. 2005;31. doi: 10.1017/S0260210505006583
152
Halliday F. International society as homogeneity. Rethinking international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1994.
153
Roy E. Jones. The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure. Review of International Studies. 1981;7:1–13.
154
WAeVER O. International Society -- Theoretical Promises Unfulfilled? Cooperation and Conflict. 1992;27:97–128. doi: 10.1177/0010836792027001004
155
DUNNE T. International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled? Cooperation and Conflict. 1995;30:125–54. doi: 10.1177/0010836795030002002
156
Russett B. Liberalism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
157
Sterling-Folker J. Neo-Liberalism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
158
Michael W. Doyle. Liberalism and World Politics. The American Political Science Review. 1986;80:1151–69.
159
Sterling-Folker J. All Hail to the Chief: Liberal IR Theory in the New World Order. International Studies Perspectives. 2014;n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/insp.12089
160
Viotti PR, Kauppi MV. Pluralism: decisionmaking, transnationalism and interdependence. International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism. Boston: Allyn and Bacon 1998.
161
Long D, Wilson P, Navari C. Thinkers of The twenty years’ crisis: inter-war idealism reassessed. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1995.
162
Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man. [Updated edition]. UK: Penguin Books 2020.
163
Kant I. Perpetual peace. Kant: political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991.
164
Kegley CW. Controversies in international relations theory: realism and the neoliberal challenge. New York: St. Martin’s Press 1995.
165
ARCHIBUGI D. Immanuel Kant, Cosmopolitan Law and Peace. European Journal of International Relations. 1995;1:429–56. doi: 10.1177/1354066195001004002
166
Archibugi D, Held D. Cosmopolitan democracy: an agenda for a new world order. Cambridge: Polity Press 1995.
167
Barkawi T. War inside the free world. Democracy, liberalism, and war: rethinking the democratic peace debate. Boulder, Co: Lynne Rienner Publishers 2001.
168
CAVALLAR G. Kantian perspectives on democratic peace: alternatives to Doyle. Review of International Studies. 2001;27. doi: 10.1017/S0260210500002291
169
Cox M, Ikenberry GJ, Inoguchi T. American democracy promotion: impulses, strategies, and impacts. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.
170
Doyle MW. Ways of war and peace: realism, liberalism, and socialism. 1st ed. London: Norton 1997.
171
Antonio Franceschet. Sovereignty and Freedom: Immanuel Kant’s Liberal Internationalist ‘Legacy’. Review of International Studies. 2001;27:209–28.
172
Mark F. N. Franke. Immanuel Kant and the (Im)Possibility of International Relations Theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 1995;20:279–322.
173
Hutchings K, ebrary, Inc. Kant, critique and politics. London: Routledge 1996.
174
John Macmillan. Democracies Don’t Fight: A Case of the Wrong Research Agenda? Review of International Studies. 1996;22:275–99.
175
Onuf N, Johnson T. Peace in the liberal world: does democracy matter? Controversies in international relations theory: realism and the neoliberal challenge. New York: St. Martin’s Press 1995.
176
Nardin T, Mapel DR. Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992.
177
WILLIAMS MC. The Discipline of the Democratic Peace:: Kant, Liberalism and the Social Construction of Security Communities. European Journal of International Relations. 2001;7:525–53. doi: 10.1177/1354066101007004006
178
Halliday F. Rethinking international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1994.
179
Simmons B, Martin L. Chapter. Handbook of international relations. London: SAGE 2002.
180
Baldwin DA. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. New York: Columbia University Press 1993.
181
Keohane RO, Nye JS. Power and interdependence. 2nd ed. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman 1989.
182
Robert O. Keohane. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly. 1988;32:379–96.
183
Robert O. Keohane and Lisa L. Martin. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security. 1995;20:39–51.
184
Joseph M. Grieco. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization. 1988;42:485–507.
185
Long D. The Harvard School of Liberal International Theory: A Case for Closure. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1995;24:489–505. doi: 10.1177/03058298950240031201
186
Mearsheimer J. The false promise of international institutions. International Security 19 (3) 1994/5.
187
Fierke K. Constructivism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
188
Reus-Smit C. Constructivism. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
189
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. Constructivism and its Ethics. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
190
Alexander Wendt. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 1992;46:391–425.
191
Wendt AE. The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization. 1987;41. doi: 10.1017/S002081830002751X
192
Wendt A. Why a World State is Inevitable. European Journal of International Relations. 2003;9:491–542. doi: 10.1177/135406610394001
193
Wendt A. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 1999.
194
Alexander Wendt. Constructing International Politics. International Security. 1995;20:71–81.
195
Guzzini S, Leander A. Constructivism and international relations: Alexander Wendt and his critics. London: Routledge 2006.
196
Guzzini S, Leander A. Constructivism and international relations: Alexander Wendt and his critics. London: Routledge 2006.
197
Zehfuss M. Constructivism in international relations: the politics of reality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press 2002.
198
Alexander Wendt. Constructing International Politics. International Security. 1995;20:71–81.
199
Forum on <em>Social Theory of International Politics</em>. Review of International Studies. 2000;26:123–4.
200
Ted Hopf. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 1998;23:171–200.
201
John Gerard Ruggie. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization. 1998;52:855–85.
202
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization. 1998;52:887–917.
203
Audie Klotz. Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions Against South Africa. International Organization. 1995;49:451–78.
204
Lebow RN, Risse-Kappen T. International relations theory and the end of the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press 1995.
205
Adler E, Barnett MN. Security communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998.
206
Keck ME, Sikkink K. Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press 1998.
207
Biersteker TJ, Weber C. State sovereignty as social construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.
208
Katzenstein PJ. Cultural norms and national security: police and military in postwar Japan. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press 1998.
209
Nina Tannenwald. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use. International Organization. 1999;53:433–68.
210
ZEHFUSS M. Constructivism and Identity:: A Dangerous Liaison. European Journal of International Relations. 2001;7:315–48. doi: 10.1177/1354066101007003002
211
Kubálková V, Onuf NG, Kowert P. International relations in a constructed world. Armonk, N.Y: M.E. Sharpe 1998.
212
Hurrell A. Chapter ‘Norms and Ethics in International relations’ in Handbook of international relations. Handbook of international relations. London: SAGE 2002.
213
Searle JR. The construction of social reality. London: Penguin 1995.
214
Winch P. The idea of a social science: and its relation to philosophy ; second edition. 2nd ed. London: Routledge 1990.
215
Wight C. Chapter ‘Philosophy of science and international relations’. Handbook of international relations. London: SAGE 2002.
216
Hollis M. The philosophy of social science: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994.
217
Collin F. Theory and understanding: a critique of interpretive social science. Oxford: Blackwell 1985.
218
Rupert M. Marxism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
219
Linklater A. Marx and Marxism. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
220
Teschke B. Marxism. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
221
TESCHKE B. Theorizing the Westphalian System of States: International Relations from Absolutism to Capitalism. European Journal of International Relations. 2002;8:5–48. doi: 10.1177/1354066102008001001
222
Marx K, Engels F. Bourgeois and Proletarians. The communist manifesto. London: Pluto Press 2008.
223
Edkins J, Vaughan-Williams N. Critical theorists and international relations. London: Routledge 2009.
224
Marx K, Engels F, Tucker RC. The Marx-Engels reader. 2nd ed. New York: Norton 1978.
225
Callinicos A. Actuality of imperialism. Millennium 31 (2) 2002.
226
Cox R. The point is not just to explain the world but to change it. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
227
Gill S. New constitutionalism, democratisation and global political economy∗. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change. 1998;10:23–38. doi: 10.1080/14781159808412845
228
Cox RW. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1981;10:126–55. doi: 10.1177/03058298810100020501
229
Gill S. Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993.
230
Rupert M. The hegemonic project of liberal globalization. Ideologies of globalization: contending visions of a new world order. London: Routledge 2000.
231
Maclean J. Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1988;17:295–319. doi: 10.1177/03058298880170021201
232
Kubálková V, Cruickshank AA. Marxism-Leninism and theory of international relations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1980.
233
Davenport A. Marxism in IR: Condemned to a Realist fate? European Journal of International Relations. 2013;19:27–48. doi: 10.1177/1354066111416021
234
Rosenberg J. The empire of civil society: a critique of the realist theory of international relations. London: Verso 1993.
235
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. International theory: positivism and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press 1996.
236
Sayer D. Capitalism and modernity: an excursus on Marx and Weber. London: Routledge 1991.
237
Teschke B. The myth of 1648: class, geopolitics, and the making of modern international relations. 1st pbk. ed. London: Verso 2009.
238
David L. Blaney and Naeem Inayatullah. The Westphalian Deferral. International Studies Review. 2000;2:29–64.
239
Anievas A. Marxism and world politics: contesting global capitalism. London: Routledge 2010.
240
Bidet J, Kouvélakis E. Critical companion to contemporary Marxism. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books 2009.
241
Roach S. Critical Theory. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
242
Jones RW. Locating Critical in Critical international Relations Theory. Critical theory and world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers 2001.
243
Linklater A. Achievements of Critical Theory. International theory: positivism and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press 1996.
244
Booth K. Three tyrannies. Human rights in global politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999.
245
Ken Booth. Security and Emancipation. Review of International Studies. 1991;17:313–26.
246
Linklater A. Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1990.
247
Linklater A. The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the post-Westphalian era. Oxford: Polity 1998.
248
Hoffman M. Restructuring, Reconstruction, . Reinscription, Rearticulation: Four Voices in Critical International Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1991;20:169–85. doi: 10.1177/03058298910200021001
249
Hoffman M. Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1987;16:231–50. doi: 10.1177/03058298870160022801
250
Jahn B. One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1998;27:613–41. doi: 10.1177/03058298980270030201
251
PRICE R, REUS - SMIT C. Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations. 1998;4:259–94. doi: 10.1177/1354066198004003001
252
HUTCHINGS K. Happy Anniversary! Time and critique in International Relations theory. Review of International Studies. 2007;33. doi: 10.1017/S0260210507007401
253
Wyn Jones R. Critical theory and world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers 2001.
254
Shapcott R. Critical Theory. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
255
Kurki M. The Limitations of the Critical Edge: Reflections on Critical and Philosophical IR Scholarship Today. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2011;40:129–46. doi: 10.1177/0305829811411997
256
Campbell D. Poststructuralism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
257
Edkins J. Poststructuralism. International relations theory for the twenty-first century: an introduction. London: Routledge 2007.
258
Campbell D, ebrary, Inc. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Rev. ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1998.
259
Campbell D, ebrary, Inc. National deconstruction: violence, identity, and justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1998.
260
Shapiro MJ, Der Derian J. International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books 1989.
261
Edkins J. Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers 2023.
262
George J. Discourses of global politics: a critical (re)introduction to international relations. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers 1994.
263
Walker RBJ. Inside/outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993.
264
Bartelson J. A genealogy of sovereignty. New York: Cambridge University Press 1995.
265
Dean M. Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge 1994.
266
Hardt M, Negri A. Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire. London: Penguin 2006.
267
Hardt M, Negri A. Empire. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 2001.
268
Prozorov S, ebrary, Inc. Foucault, freedom and sovereignty. Aldershot, England: Ashgate 2007.
269
Walker RBJ. After the globe, before the world. London: Routledge 2010.
270
Campbell D, Shapiro MJ. Moral spaces: rethinking ethics and world politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1999.
271
Ashley RK. Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1988;17:227–62. doi: 10.1177/03058298880170020901
272
Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker. Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly. 1990;34:259–68.
273
Edkins J. Legality with a Vengeance: Famines and Humanitarian Relief in ‘Complex Emergencies’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1996;25:547–75. doi: 10.1177/03058298960250030501
274
Edkins J. Ethics and Practices of Engagement: Intellectuals as Experts. International Relations. 2005;19:64–9. doi: 10.1177/0047117805050062
275
Huysmans J. Minding Exceptions: The Politics of Insecurity and Liberal Democracy. Contemporary Political Theory. 2004;3:321–41. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300137
276
Edkins J, Pin-Fat V. Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2005;34:1–24. doi: 10.1177/03058298050340010101
277
PIN-FAT, VÉRONIQUE. (Im)possible universalism: reading human rights in world politics. Review of International Studies. 2001;26:663–74.
278
Maja Zehfuss. Forget September 11. Third World Quarterly. 2003;24:513–28.
279
Grovogui SN. Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans: race and self-determination in international law. 1st ed. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press 1996.
280
Tickner JA, Sjoberg L. Feminism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010.
281
True J. Feminism. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
282
Sylvester C, ebrary, Inc. Feminist international relations: an unfinished journey. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press 2002.
283
Tickner JA. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41:611–32. doi: 10.1111/1468-2478.00060
284
Adam Jones. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 1996;22:405–29.
285
CARVER, TERRELL; COCHRAN, MOLLY; SQUIRES, JUDITH. Gendering Jones: feminisms, IRs, masculinities. Review of International Studies. 2000;24:283–97.
286
Keohane RO. Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory. International Studies Quarterly. 1998;42:193–7. doi: 10.1111/0020-8833.00076
287
Halliday F. Rethinking international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1994.
288
Peterson VS. Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1992;21:183–206. doi: 10.1177/03058298920210020401
289
Tickner JA. Why Women Can’t Run the World: International Politics According to Francis Fukuyama. International Studies Review. 1999;1:3–11. doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.00162
290
Keohane RO. International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1989;18:245–53. doi: 10.1177/03058298890180021001
291
Weber C. Good Girls, Little Girls, and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1994;23:337–49. doi: 10.1177/03058298940230021401
292
Enloe CH. Bananas, beaches & bases: making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley .
293
Enloe CH. The morning after: sexual politics at the end of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press 1993.
294
Steans J. Gender and international relations: an introduction. Oxford: Polity 1998.
295
Sjoberg L, Gentry CE, ebrary, Inc. Women, gender, and terrorism. Athens: University of Georgia Press 2011.
296
Sjoberg L. Gender and international security: feminist perspectives. London: Routledge 2010.
297
Tickner JA. Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. New York: Columbia University Press 2001.
298
Zalewski M. Feminist international relations: exquisite corpse. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 2013.
299
Shepherd LJ, Hamilton C. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. 3rd ed. Oxon, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2022.
300
Biswas S. Postcolonialism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
301
Abrahamsen R. Postcolonialism. International relations theory for the twenty-first century: an introduction. London: Routledge 2007.
302
Bilgin P. Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly. 2008;29:5–23. doi: 10.1080/01436590701726392
303
Chowdhry G, Nair S. Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class. London: Routledge 2004.
304
Krishna S. Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield .
305
Ling LHM. Postcolonial international relations: conquest and desire between Asia and the West. Basingstoke: Palgrave 2002.
306
Doty RL, ebrary, Inc. Imperial encounters: the politics of representation in North-South relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1996.
307
Escobar A, ebrary, Inc. Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1995.
308
Ferguson J. The anti-politics machine: ‘development,’ depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1994.
309
Loomba A. Colonialism - postcolonialism. 2nd. ed. Abingdon: Routledge 2005.
310
Darby P. At the edge of international relations: postcolonialism, gender and dependency. New York: Continuum 2000.
311
Riley R, Inayatullah N. Interrogating imperialism: conversations on gender, race, and war. New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2006.
312
Edkins J, Zehfuss M. Global politics: a new introduction. Second edition. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 2014.
313
Edkins J, Zehfuss M. Global politics: a new introduction. Second edition. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 2014.
314
Kate Manzo. Critical Humanism: Postcolonialism and Postmodern Ethics. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 1997;22:381–408.
315
Said EW. Orientalism. London: Penguin 2003.
316
Nelson C, Grossberg L. Marxism and the interpretation of culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press 1988.
317
Shampa Biswas. ‘Nuclear Apartheid’ as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Resource? Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 2001;26:485–522.
318
Biswas S. Empire and Global Public Intellectuals: Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2007;36:117–33. doi: 10.1177/03058298070360010801
319
Bilgin P. Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly. 2008;29:5–23. doi: 10.1080/01436590701726392
320
Bilgin P. Looking for ‘the International’ beyond the West. Third World Quarterly. 2010;31:817–28. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2010.502696
321
Seth S. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. London: Routledge 2013.
322
Shilliam R. International relations and non-western thought: imperialism, colonialism, and investigations of global modernity. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 2011.
323
Nardin T. International Political Theory. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
324
Toni Erskine. Normative IR Theory. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
325
Beitz CR, NetLibrary, Inc. Political theory and international relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1999.
326
Booth K, Dunne T, Cox M. How might we live?: global ethics in a new century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001.
327
Caney S. Justice beyond borders: a global political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005.
328
Frost M, Frost M. Ethics in international relations: a constitutive theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.
329
Hutchings K. Global ethics: an introduction. Cambridge: Polity 2010.
330
Linklater A. Critical theory and world politics: citizenship, sovereignty and humanity. London: Routledge 2007.
331
Linklater A, London School of Economics and Political Science. Men and citizens in the theory of international relations. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics and Political Science 1990.
332
Miller D. National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
333
Nardin T. Law, morality, and the relations of states. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1983.
334
Sutch P. Ethics, justice, and international relations: constructing an international community. New York: Routledge 2001.
335
Tan K-C. Justice without borders: cosmopolitanism, nationalism, and patriotism. New York: Cambridge University Press 2004.
336
Walzer M. Thick and thin: moral agrument at home and abroad. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press 1994.
337
Walzer M. Spheres of justice: a defence of pluralism and equality. Oxford: Blackwell 1985.
338
Linklater A. The Evolving Spheres of International Justice. International Affairs. 1999;75:473–82. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.00088
339
O’NEILL O. Bounded and cosmopolitan justice. Review of International Studies. 2000;26. doi: 10.1017/S0260210500000450
340
Bain W. Between anarchy and society: trusteeship and the obligations of power. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003.
341
Beitz CR. Social and Cosmopolitan Liberalism. International Affairs. 1999;75:515–29. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.00091
342
Brassett J, Bulley D. Ethics in World Politics: Cosmopolitanism and Beyond? International Politics. 2007;44:1–18. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800155
343
Chris Brown. The House That Chuck Built: Twenty-Five Years of Reading Charles Beitz. Review of International Studies. 2005;31:371–9.
344
Wight M. Why is there no International Theory? International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1995.
345
Cox R. The point is not just to explain the World but to change It. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
346
Dunne T, Hansen L, Wight C. The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations. 2013;19:405–25. doi: 10.1177/1354066113495485
347
Ferguson YH. Diversity in IR Theory: Pluralism as an Opportunity for Understanding Global Politics. International Studies Perspectives. 2015;16:3–12. doi: 10.1111/insp.12092
348
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
349
Smith S. The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: ‘Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline’. International Studies Review. 2002;4:67–85. doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.00255
350
Edkins J, Zehfuss M. Global politics: a new introduction. Second edition. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 2014.
351
Bull H, Alderson K, Hurrell A, et al. Hedley Bull on international society. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press 2000.
352
Collingwood RG. The idea of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1961.
353
Edkins J. Trauma and the memory of politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003.
354
Elman C, Elman MF. Bridges and boundaries: historians, political scientists, and the study of international relations. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 2001.
355
John Lewis Gaddis. International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War. International Security. 1993;17:5–58.
356
Hobson JM, ebrary, Inc. The state and international relations. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press 2000.
357
John M. Hobson. The Historical Sociology of the State and the State of Historical Sociology in International Relations. Review of International Political Economy. 1998;5:284–320.
358
Doyle MW, Ikenberry GJ. New thinking in international relations theory. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press 1997.
359
Neufeld MA. The restructuring of international relations theory. New York, N.Y: Cambridge University Press 1995.
360
Rengger NJ, ebrary, Inc. International relations, political theory, and the problem of order: beyond international relations theory? London: Routledge 2000.
361
Wight M, Wight G, Porter B, et al. International theory: the three traditions. Leicester: Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs 1991.
362
Tickner AB, Wæver O. International relations: scholarship around the world. London: Routledge 2009.
363
Shapiro MJ, Der Derian J. International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books 1989.
364
Walker RBJ. Inside/outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993.
365
Smith S. Introduction. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
366
Kurki M, Wight C. Chapter 1 of International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
367
Dunne T, Hansen L, Wight C. The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations. 2013;19:405–25. doi: 10.1177/1354066113495485
368
Lebow N. Classical Realism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
369
Andreas Osiander. Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited. International Studies Quarterly. 1998;42:409–32.
370
Wilson, Peter. The myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies. 2001;24:1–16.
371
BAIN, WILLIAM. Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered. Review of International Studies. 2000;26:445–64.
372
Mearsheimer J. Chapter 4. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
373
Sterling-Folker J. Chapter 6. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
374
Dunne T. Chapter 7. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
375
Kenneth N. Waltz. Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security. 2000;25:5–41.
376
Robert O. Keohane and Lisa L. Martin. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security. 1995;20:39–51.
377
The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security. ;19:5–49.
378
Bull H. Society and Anarchy in International Relations. International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1995.
379
Fierke K. Constructivism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
380
Alexander Wendt. Constructing International Politics. International Security. 1995;20:71–81.
381
Alexander Wendt. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 1992;46:391–425.
382
Ted Hopf. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 1998;23:171–200.
383
Mark Rupert. Marxism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
384
Gill S. New constitutionalism, democratisation and global political economy∗. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change. 1998;10:23–38. doi: 10.1080/14781159808412845
385
Cox R. Social Forces, States and World Orders. Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press 1986.
386
Roach S. Critical Theory. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
387
Campbell D. Poststructuralism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
388
Ken Booth. Human Wrongs and International Relations. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 1995;71:103–26.
389
Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker. Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly. 1990;34:259–68.
390
Kurki M. The Limitations of the Critical Edge: Reflections on Critical and Philosophical IR Scholarship Today. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2011;40:129–46. doi: 10.1177/0305829811411997
391
Grovogui S. Postcolonialism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
392
Tickner JA, Sjoberg L. Feminism. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
393
Shampa Biswas. ‘Nuclear Apartheid’ as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Resource? Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 2001;26:485–522.
394
J. Ann Tickner. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41:611–32.
395
Erskine T. Normative Theory. In: Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
396
Nau H. Scholarship and policy-making: who speaks truth to whom? The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
397
SMITH, STEVE. Power and truth; a reply to William Wallace. Review of International Studies. 2000;23:507–16.
398
Review by: William Wallace. Review: Truth and Power, Monks and Technocrats: Theory and Practice in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 1996;22:301–21.
399
Ken Booth. Discussion: A Reply to Wallace. Review of International Studies. 1997;23:371–7.
400
Krishna S. Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield .
401
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
