Bibliography for IP30120 International Political Theory Today

[1]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

[2]
S. Burchill, Theories of international relations, 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

[3]
A. Linklater, International relations: critical concepts in political science. New York: Routledge, 2000.

[4]
C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, The Oxford handbook of international relations, vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

[5]
W. Carlsnaes, B. A. Simmons, and T. Risse-Kappen, Handbook of international relations. London: SAGE, 2002. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037238880002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[6]
J. Der Derian, International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.

[7]
S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, International theory: positivism and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[8]
K. Booth and S. Smith, International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.

[9]
H. Bull, ‘Chapter 8: The Theory of International Politics’, in International theory: critical investigations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.

[10]
M. Cox, T. Dunne, and K. Booth, Empires, systems and states: great transformations in international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

[11]
F. Halliday, ‘Chapter 11: The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[12]
J. Der Derian, International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.

[13]
K. Holsti, ‘The study of International Relations During the Cold War’, Review of International Studies, Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=71442&jid=RIS&volumeId=24&issueId=05&aid=71441

[14]
R. Little, ‘Growing Relevance of Pluralism’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[15]
M. Kahler, ‘Inventing International Relations’, in New thinking in international relations theory, Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1997.

[16]
M. Nicholson, ‘Continued Significance of Positivism?’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[17]
J. Rosenau, ‘Probing puzzles persistently’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[18]
S. Smith, ‘Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11. Presidential Address to the International Studies Association, February 27, 2003, Portland, OR’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 499–515, Sept. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.t01-1-00312.x

[19]
S. Smith, ‘Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 189–206, June 1987, doi: 10.1177/03058298870160022501

[20]
S. Smith, ‘The Forty Years’ Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 489–506, Dec. 1992, doi: 10.1177/03058298920210030301

[21]
O. Waever, ‘The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[22]
S. Smith, ‘Ten Self-Images of the Discipline: A genealogy of International Relations Theory’, in International relations theory today, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.

[23]
O. Waever, ‘The sociology of not so international discipline’, International Organization, Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=173292&jid=INO&volumeId=52&issueId=04&aid=173291

[24]
M. Hollis and S. Smith, Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.

[25]
M. Kurki and C. Wight, ‘International Relations as a Social Science’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[26]
P. T. Jackson, The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics, vol. The new international relations. London: Routledge, 2011. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203843321

[27]
C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, The Oxford handbook of international relations, vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

[28]
B. Schmidt, ‘On the history and historiography of international relations’, in Handbook of international relations, London: SAGE, 2002. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039446880002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[29]
K. Booth and T. Dunne, Worlds in collision: terror and the future of global order. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.

[30]
K. Booth and S. Smith, International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.

[31]
C. Brown and K. Ainley, Understanding international relations, 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

[32]
I. Clark, Globalization and international relations theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

[33]
W. Carlsnaes, B. A. Simmons, and T. Risse-Kappen, Handbook of international relations. London: SAGE, 2002. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037243300002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[34]
M. Cox, K. Booth, and T. Dunne, The interregnum: controversies in world politics 1989-1999. Cambridge: New York, 1999.

[35]
J. Der Derian, International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.

[36]
K. Booth, M. Cox, and T. Dunne, The eighty years’ crisis: international relations 1919-1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

[37]
J. B. Ehlstain, ‘International Politics and Political Theory’, in International relations theory today, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.

[38]
F. Halliday, ‘Chapter 1’, in Rethinking international relations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994.

[39]
K. J. Holsti, The dividing discipline: hegemony and diversity in international theory. Boston [Mass.]: Allen & Unwin, 1985.

[40]
R. Jackson, ‘Is there a classical international theory?’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[41]
P. J. Katzenstein, R. O. Keohane, and S. D. Krasner, Exploration and contestation in the study of world politics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1999.

[42]
T. L. Knutsen, A history of international relations theory, 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.

[43]
H. Morgenthau, ‘The intellectual and political foundations of a theory of international relations’, in International theory: critical investigations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.

[44]
M. Nicholson, Causes and consequences in international relations: a conceptual study. New York: Pinter, 1996.

[45]
V. Pin-Fat, ‘How do we begin to think about the world?’, in Global politics: a new introduction, Second edition.Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2014. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039312480002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[46]
B. C. Schmidt, The political discourse of anarchy: a disciplinary history of international relations, vol. SUNY series in global politics. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998.

[47]
M. V. Kauppi and P. R. Viotti, ‘Chapter 1’, in International relations theory, Sixth edition.Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2020. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9781538115701

[48]
M. Wight, ‘Why is there no international theory’, in Diplomatic investigations: essays in the theory of international politics, London: Allen & Unwin, 1966.

[49]
N. Woods, ‘ch 1’, in Explaining international relations since 1945, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

[50]
M. Zehfuss, ‘Conclusion’, in Global politics: a new introduction, Second edition.Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2014. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039368620002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[51]
Andreas Osiander, ‘Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 409–432, 1998, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600745?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[52]
Wilson, Peter, ‘The myth of the “First Great Debate”’, Review of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 05, pp. 1–16, 2001, Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=71437&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210598000011

[53]
Lucian M. Ashworth, ‘Where Are the Idealists in Interwar International Relations?’, Review of International Studies, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 291–308, 2006, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40072139?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[54]
E. H. Carr and M. Cox, The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.

[55]
K. Mannheim, Ideology and Utopia: an introduction to the sociology of knowledge, vol. Routledge paperbacks. Routledge & K.Paul, 1960.

[56]
C. Navari, ‘The Great illusion Revisited: The International theory of Norman Angell’, Review of International Studies, Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=6280224&jid=RIS&volumeId=15&issueId=04&aid=6280216

[57]
D. J. Markwell, ‘Sir Alfred Zimmern Revisited: Fifty Years On’, Review of International Studies, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 279–292, 1986, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097090?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[58]
David Long, ‘J. A. Hobson and Idealism in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 285–304, 1991, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097263?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[59]
D. Long and P. Wilson, Thinkers of The twenty years’ crisis: inter-war idealism reassessed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.

[60]
N. Lebow, ‘Classical Realism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[61]
J. Donnelly, ‘Realism’, in Theories of international relations, 4th ed.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

[62]
BAIN, WILLIAM, ‘Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered’, Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 03, pp. 445–464, 2000, Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=54165&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210500004459

[63]
Véronique Pin-Fat, ‘The Metaphysics of the National Interest and the “Mysticism” of the Nation-State: Reading Hans J. Morgenthau’, Review of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 217–236, 2005, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40072094?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[64]
M. COZETTE, ‘Reclaiming the critical dimension of realism: Hans J. Morgenthau on the ethics of scholarship’, Review of International Studies, vol. 34, no. 01, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1017/S0260210508007882

[65]
M. C. Williams and ebrary, Inc, Realism reconsidered: the legacy of Hans Morgenthau in international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10212228

[66]
R. Aron, F. Draus, and E. Shils, History, truth, liberty: selected writings of Raymond Aron. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.

[67]
B. Buzan, ‘Timeless Wisdom of Realism?’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[68]
C. Craig, Glimmer of a new Leviathan: total war in the realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.

[69]
E. H. Carr and M. Cox, The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.

[70]
E. H. Carr, Conditions of peace. London: Macmillan, 1942.

[71]
J. Haslam, No virtue like necessity: realist thought in international relations since Machiavelli. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.

[72]
H. J. Morgenthau, K. W. Thompson, and W. D. Clinton, Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace, 7th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education, 2005.

[73]
H. J. Morgenthau, The purpose of American politics. New York: Knopf, 1960.

[74]
H. J. Morgenthau, The decline of democratic politics, vol. Politics in the twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

[75]
H. J. Morgenthau, American foreign policy: a critical examination. London: Methuen, 1952.

[76]
H. J. Morgenthau, Scientific man vs. power politics. Chicago, Ill: The University of Chicago press, 1946.

[77]
G. F. Kennan, American diplomacy, 1900-1950. London: Secker & Warburg, 1952.

[78]
Alan James, ‘The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 215–229, 1989, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097183?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[79]
G. Kennan, ‘Morality and Foreign Policy | Foreign Affairs’. Available: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/40521/george-f-kennan/morality-and-foreign-policy

[80]
R. Niebuhr, The children of light and the children of darkness: a vindication of democracy and a critique of its traditional defense, University of Chicago Press edition. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 2011.

[81]
R. Niebuhr, Moral man and immoral society: a study in ethics and politics. London: S.C.M.Press, 1963.

[82]
V. Pin-Fat, Universality, ethics and international relations: a grammatical reading, vol. Interventions. London: Routledge, 2010.

[83]
C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, The Oxford handbook of international relations, vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

[84]
M. J. Smith, Realist thought from Weber to Kissinger, vol. Political traditions in foreign policy series. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1986.

[85]
W. D. Clinton and ebrary, Inc, The realist tradition and contemporary international relations, vol. Political traditions in foreign policy. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2007. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10297284

[86]
R. D. Spegele, Political realism in international theory, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[87]
J. A. Vasquez and ebrary, Inc, The power of power politics: from classical realism to neotraditionalism, [New ed., enl.]., vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=5005948

[88]
K. N. Waltz, Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037243280002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[89]
G. Schwarzenberger, Power politics: a study of world society, 3rd ed., vol. Library of world affairs. Stevens, 1964.

[90]
A. Wolfers, ‘Statesmanship and moral choice’, in Discord and collaboration: essays on international politics, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1965.

[91]
M. C. Williams, The realist tradition and the limits of international relations, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

[92]
M. C. Williams and ebrary, Inc, Realism reconsidered: the legacy of Hans Morgenthau in international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10212228

[93]
K. Booth, Realism and world politics. London: Routledge, 2011.

[94]
J. Donnelly and ebrary, Inc, Realism and international relations, vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=2000672

[95]
T. Nardin and D. R. Mapel, Traditions of international ethics, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

[96]
R. N. Lebow, A cultural theory of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037264560002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[97]
R. N. Lebow, The Tragic vision of politics: ethics, interests, and orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037307740002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[98]
Robert Gilpin, ‘The richness of the tradition of political realism’, in Neorealism and its critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

[99]
J. George, ‘Realist “Ethics”, International Relations, and Post-modernism: Thinking Beyond the Egoism-Anarchy Thematic’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 195–223, July 1995, doi: 10.1177/03058298950240020301

[100]
J. Mearsheimer, ‘Structural Realism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[101]
J. Donnelly, ‘Realism’, in Theories of international relations, 4th ed.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

[102]
K. Waltz, ‘Reflections on theory of international politics’, in Neorealism and its critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

[103]
C. Craig, Glimmer of a new Leviathan: total war in the realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.

[104]
B. Buzan, C. A. Jones, and R. Little, The logic of anarchy: neorealism to structural realism, vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.

[105]
J. J. Mearsheimer, The tragedy of Great Power politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Co, 2001.

[106]
K. N. Waltz, Theory of international politics. London: McGraw-Hill, 1979.

[107]
‘The false promise of international institutions’. Available: http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0021.pdf

[108]
J. Mearsheimer, ‘Back to the future’, Available: http://aspire.aber.ac.uk/ui/forms/bookmarklet.html?fast=true&promptForBookmarkButtonUpdate=true&title=&uri=http%253A%252F%252Fmearsheimer.uchicago.edu%252Fpdfs%252FA0017.pdf

[109]
J. Mearsheimer, ‘Back to the Future’, Available: http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0017.pdf

[110]
HALLIDAY, FRED; ROSENBERG, JUSTIN, ‘Interview with Ken Waltz CONDUCTED BY FRED HALLIDAY AND JUSTIN ROSENBERG’, Review of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 03, pp. 371–386, 2000, Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=33595&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210598003714

[111]
R. O. Keohane, Neorealism and its critics, vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

[112]
F. Halliday, Rethinking international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994.

[113]
A. Linklater, ‘Neorealism in theory and practice’, in International relations theory today, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.

[114]
J. George, ‘ch 5’, in Discourses of global politics: a critical (re)introduction to international relations, Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1994.

[115]
Friedrich Kratochwil, ‘The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik without Politics’, Review of International Studies, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 63–80, 1993, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097320?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[116]
Richard K. Ashley, ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, International Organization, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 225–286, 1984, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[117]
J. Mearsheimer and S. Walt, ‘An Unnecessary War’, Available: http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0032.pdf

[118]
B. Buzan, ‘The timeless wisdom of realism?’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[119]
J. Donnelly and ebrary, Inc, Realism and international relations, vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=2000672

[120]
R. O. Keohane, Neorealism and its critics, vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

[121]
R. Gilpin, ‘The richness of the tradition of political realism’, in Neorealism and its critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

[122]
J. Donnelly, ‘Twentieth century realism’, in Traditions of international ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

[123]
W. D. Clinton and ebrary, Inc, The realist tradition and contemporary international relations, vol. Political traditions in foreign policy. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2007. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10297284

[124]
T. Dunne, ‘English School’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[125]
A. Linklater, ‘The English School’, in Theories of international relations, 4th ed.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

[126]
H. Bull, ‘Society and anarchy in international relations’, in International theory: critical investigations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.

[127]
A. Linklater and H. Suganami, The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780511314704

[128]
H. Bull, The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics, Fourth edition. Basingstoke, [England]: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. Available: https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=4606254720002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[129]
K. Alderson, A. Hurrell, and ebrary, Inc, Hedley Bull on international society. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=5007593

[130]
H. Bull, ‘Justice in international relations, Hagey lectures’, in Hedley Bull on international society, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=5007593

[131]
H. Bull, B. Kingsbury, and A. Roberts, Hugo Grotius and international relations. Oxford: Clarendon, 1990.

[132]
H. Bull and A. Watson, The Expansion of international society. Oxford: Clarendon, 1984.

[133]
H. Butterfield, Diplomatic investigations. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2019. Available: https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=4776381570002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[134]
B. Buzan and ebrary, Inc, From international to world society?: English school theory and the social structure of globalisation, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10124685

[135]
A. J. Bellamy, International society and its critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780191532702

[136]
Chris Brown, ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’, Review of International Studies, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 183–196, 1995, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097405?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[137]
Barry Buzan, ‘From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School’, International Organization, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 327–352, 1993, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706979?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[138]
I. Clark, Legitimacy in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780191531668

[139]
T. Dunne, Inventing international society: a history of the English school, vol. St. Antony’s series. Basingstoke UK: Macmillan Press Ltd, 1998.

[140]
Various, ‘Forum on English School’, Review of International Studies, Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=RIS&volumeId=27&seriesId=0&issueId=03

[141]
R. H. Jackson, The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780191522604

[142]
N. J. Rengger and ebrary, Inc, International relations, political theory, and the problem of order: beyond international relations theory?, vol. The New international relations. London: Routledge, 2000. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10017509

[143]
R. J. Vincent, Nonintervention and international order. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1974.

[144]
M. Wight, G. Wight, and B. Porter, Four seminal thinkers in international theory: Machiavelli, Grotius, Kant, and Mazzini. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

[145]
M. Wight, Systems of states. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1977.

[146]
M. Wight, G. Wight, B. Porter, and Royal Institute of International Affairs, International theory: the three traditions. Leicester: Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1991.

[147]
R. H. Jackson, ‘Martin Wight, International Theory and the Good Life’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 261–272, June 1990, doi: 10.1177/03058298900190020901

[148]
Nicholas J. Wheeler and Timothy Dunne, ‘Hedley Bull’s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will’, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 91–107, 1996, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2624751?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[149]
H. Suganami, ‘The international society perspective on world politics reconsidered’, International relations of the Asia-Pacific’, Available: http://irap.oxfordjournals.org/content/2/1/1.full.pdf

[150]
D. Copeland, ‘A Realist critique of the English School’, Review of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 03, July 2003, doi: 10.1017/S0260210503004273

[151]
J. EDKINS and M. ZEHFUSS, ‘Generalising the international’, Review of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 03, July 2005, doi: 10.1017/S0260210505006583

[152]
F. Halliday, ‘International society as homogeneity’, in Rethinking international relations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994.

[153]
Roy E. Jones, ‘The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure’, Review of International Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 1981, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20096900?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[154]
O. WAeVER, ‘International Society -- Theoretical Promises Unfulfilled?’, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 97–128, Mar. 1992, doi: 10.1177/0010836792027001004

[155]
T. DUNNE, ‘International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled?’, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 125–154, June 1995, doi: 10.1177/0010836795030002002

[156]
B. Russett, ‘Liberalism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[157]
J. Sterling-Folker, ‘Neo-Liberalism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[158]
Michael W. Doyle, ‘Liberalism and World Politics’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 1151–1169, 1986, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1960861?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[159]
J. Sterling-Folker, ‘All Hail to the Chief: Liberal IR Theory in the New World Order’, International Studies Perspectives, p. n/a-n/a, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1111/insp.12089

[160]
P. R. Viotti and M. V. Kauppi, ‘Pluralism: decisionmaking, transnationalism and interdependence’, in International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, 3rd ed.Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998.

[161]
D. Long, P. Wilson, and C. Navari, Thinkers of The twenty years’ crisis: inter-war idealism reassessed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.

[162]
F. Fukuyama, The end of history and the last man, [Updated edition]. UK: Penguin Books, 2020. Available: https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5838429480002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[163]
I. Kant, ‘Perpetual peace’, in Kant: political writings, 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

[164]
C. W. Kegley, Controversies in international relations theory: realism and the neoliberal challenge. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.

[165]
D. ARCHIBUGI, ‘Immanuel Kant, Cosmopolitan Law and Peace’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 429–456, Dec. 1995, doi: 10.1177/1354066195001004002

[166]
D. Archibugi and D. Held, Cosmopolitan democracy: an agenda for a new world order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.

[167]
T. Barkawi, ‘War inside the free world’, in Democracy, liberalism, and war: rethinking the democratic peace debate, Boulder, Co: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001.

[168]
G. CAVALLAR, ‘Kantian perspectives on democratic peace: alternatives to Doyle’, Review of International Studies, vol. 27, no. 02, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.1017/S0260210500002291

[169]
M. Cox, G. J. Ikenberry, and T. Inoguchi, American democracy promotion: impulses, strategies, and impacts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

[170]
M. W. Doyle, Ways of war and peace: realism, liberalism, and socialism, 1st ed. London: Norton, 1997.

[171]
Antonio Franceschet, ‘Sovereignty and Freedom: Immanuel Kant’s Liberal Internationalist “Legacy”’, Review of International Studies, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 209–228, 2001, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097728?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[172]
Mark F. N. Franke, ‘Immanuel Kant and the (Im)Possibility of International Relations Theory’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 279–322, 1995, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644836?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[173]
K. Hutchings and ebrary, Inc, Kant, critique and politics. London: Routledge, 1996. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10017133

[174]
John Macmillan, ‘Democracies Don’t Fight: A Case of the Wrong Research Agenda?’, Review of International Studies, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 275–299, 1996, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097449?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[175]
N. Onuf and T. Johnson, ‘Peace in the liberal world: does democracy matter?’, in Controversies in international relations theory: realism and the neoliberal challenge, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.

[176]
T. Nardin and D. R. Mapel, Traditions of international ethics, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

[177]
M. C. WILLIAMS, ‘The Discipline of the Democratic Peace:: Kant, Liberalism and the Social Construction of Security Communities’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 525–553, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1177/1354066101007004006

[178]
F. Halliday, Rethinking international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994.

[179]
B. Simmons and L. Martin, ‘Chapter’, in Handbook of international relations, London: SAGE, 2002. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039358920002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[180]
D. A. Baldwin, Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate, vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.

[181]
R. O. Keohane and J. S. Nye, Power and interdependence, 2nd ed., vol. Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown series in political science. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman, 1989.

[182]
Robert O. Keohane, ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 379–396, 1988, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600589

[183]
Robert O. Keohane and Lisa L. Martin, ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’, International Security, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 39–51, 1995, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539214?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[184]
Joseph M. Grieco, ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, International Organization, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 485–507, 1988, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[185]
D. Long, ‘The Harvard School of Liberal International Theory: A Case for Closure’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 489–505, Dec. 1995, doi: 10.1177/03058298950240031201

[186]
J. Mearsheimer, ‘The false promise of international institutions’, International Security 19 (3) 1994/5, Available: http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0021.pdf

[187]
K. Fierke, ‘Constructivism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[188]
C. Reus-Smit, ‘Constructivism’, in Theories of international relations, 4th ed.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

[189]
C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, ‘Constructivism and its Ethics’, in The Oxford handbook of international relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

[190]
Alexander Wendt, ‘Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 391–425, 1992, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[191]
A. E. Wendt, ‘The agent-structure problem in international relations theory’, International Organization, vol. 41, no. 03, June 1987, doi: 10.1017/S002081830002751X

[192]
A. Wendt, ‘Why a World State is Inevitable’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 491–542, Dec. 2003, doi: 10.1177/135406610394001

[193]
A. Wendt, Social theory of international politics, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

[194]
Alexander Wendt, ‘Constructing International Politics’, International Security, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 71–81, 1995, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[195]
S. Guzzini and A. Leander, Constructivism and international relations: Alexander Wendt and his critics, vol. New international relations. London: Routledge, 2006.

[196]
S. Guzzini and A. Leander, Constructivism and international relations: Alexander Wendt and his critics, vol. New international relations. London: Routledge, 2006.

[197]
M. Zehfuss, Constructivism in international relations: the politics of reality, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780511330087

[198]
Alexander Wendt, ‘Constructing International Politics’, International Security, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 71–81, 1995, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[199]
‘Forum on <em>Social Theory of International Politics</em>’, Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 01, pp. 123–124, 2000, Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=33419&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210500001236

[200]
Ted Hopf, ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 171–200, 1998, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539267?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[201]
John Gerard Ruggie, ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’, International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 855–885, 1998, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601360?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[202]
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 887–917, 1998, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[203]
Audie Klotz, ‘Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions Against South Africa’, International Organization, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 451–478, 1995, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706905?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[204]
R. N. Lebow and T. Risse-Kappen, International relations theory and the end of the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.

[205]
E. Adler and M. N. Barnett, Security communities, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

[206]
M. E. Keck and K. Sikkink, Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037307730002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[207]
T. J. Biersteker and C. Weber, State sovereignty as social construct, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[208]
P. J. Katzenstein, Cultural norms and national security: police and military in postwar Japan. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998.

[209]
Nina Tannenwald, ‘The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use’, International Organization, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 433–468, 1999, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601286

[210]
M. ZEHFUSS, ‘Constructivism and Identity:: A Dangerous Liaison’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 315–348, Sept. 2001, doi: 10.1177/1354066101007003002

[211]
V. Kubálková, N. G. Onuf, and P. Kowert, International relations in a constructed world. Armonk, N.Y: M.E. Sharpe, 1998.

[212]
A. Hurrell, ‘Chapter “Norms and Ethics in International relations” in Handbook of international relations’, in Handbook of international relations, London: SAGE, 2002. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039446850002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[213]
J. R. Searle, The construction of social reality. London: Penguin, 1995.

[214]
P. Winch, The idea of a social science: and its relation to philosophy ; second edition, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1990.

[215]
C. Wight, ‘Chapter “Philosophy of science and international relations”’, in Handbook of international relations, London: SAGE, 2002. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039446840002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[216]
M. Hollis, The philosophy of social science: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

[217]
F. Collin, Theory and understanding: a critique of interpretive social science. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.

[218]
M. Rupert, ‘Marxism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[219]
A. Linklater, ‘Marx and Marxism’, in Theories of international relations, 4th ed.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

[220]
B. Teschke, ‘Marxism’, in The Oxford handbook of international relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

[221]
B. TESCHKE, ‘Theorizing the Westphalian System of States: International Relations from Absolutism to Capitalism’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5–48, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1177/1354066102008001001

[222]
K. Marx and F. Engels, ‘Bourgeois and Proletarians’, in The communist manifesto, New ed.London: Pluto Press, 2008. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3039312470002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[223]
J. Edkins and N. Vaughan-Williams, Critical theorists and international relations. London: Routledge, 2009. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203881842

[224]
K. Marx, F. Engels, and R. C. Tucker, The Marx-Engels reader, 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 1978.

[225]
A. Callinicos, ‘Actuality of imperialism’, Millennium 31 (2) 2002, Available: http://mil.sagepub.com/content/31/2/319.full.pdf

[226]
R. Cox, ‘The point is not just to explain the world but to change it’, in The Oxford handbook of international relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

[227]
S. Gill, ‘New constitutionalism, democratisation and global political economy∗’, Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 23–38, Feb. 1998, doi: 10.1080/14781159808412845

[228]
R. W. Cox, ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 126–155, June 1981, doi: 10.1177/03058298810100020501

[229]
S. Gill, Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

[230]
M. Rupert, ‘The hegemonic project of liberal globalization’, in Ideologies of globalization: contending visions of a new world order, London: Routledge, 2000. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10017826

[231]
J. Maclean, ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 295–319, June 1988, doi: 10.1177/03058298880170021201

[232]
V. Kubálková and A. A. Cruickshank, Marxism-Leninism and theory of international relations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.

[233]
A. Davenport, ‘Marxism in IR: Condemned to a Realist fate?’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 27–48, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1354066111416021

[234]
J. Rosenberg, The empire of civil society: a critique of the realist theory of international relations. London: Verso, 1993.

[235]
S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, International theory: positivism and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[236]
D. Sayer, Capitalism and modernity: an excursus on Marx and Weber. London: Routledge, 1991.

[237]
B. Teschke, The myth of 1648: class, geopolitics, and the making of modern international relations, 1st pbk. ed. London: Verso, 2009.

[238]
David L. Blaney and Naeem Inayatullah, ‘The Westphalian Deferral’, International Studies Review, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 29–64, 2000, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186427?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[239]
A. Anievas, Marxism and world politics: contesting global capitalism. London: Routledge, 2010.

[240]
J. Bidet and E. Kouvélakis, Critical companion to contemporary Marxism, vol. Historical materialism book series. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books, 2009.

[241]
S. Roach, ‘Critical Theory’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[242]
R. W. Jones, ‘Locating Critical in Critical international Relations Theory’, in Critical theory and world politics, Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001.

[243]
A. Linklater, ‘Achievements of Critical Theory’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[244]
K. Booth, ‘Three tyrannies’, in Human rights in global politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

[245]
Ken Booth, ‘Security and Emancipation’, Review of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 313–326, 1991, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097269?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[246]
A. Linklater, Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990.

[247]
A. Linklater, The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the post-Westphalian era. Oxford: Polity, 1998.

[248]
M. Hoffman, ‘Restructuring, Reconstruction, . Reinscription, Rearticulation: Four Voices in Critical International Theory’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 169–185, Dec. 1991, doi: 10.1177/03058298910200021001

[249]
M. Hoffman, ‘Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 231–250, June 1987, doi: 10.1177/03058298870160022801

[250]
B. Jahn, ‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 613–641, Sept. 1998, doi: 10.1177/03058298980270030201

[251]
R. PRICE and C. REUS - SMIT, ‘Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 259–294, Sept. 1998, doi: 10.1177/1354066198004003001

[252]
K. HUTCHINGS, ‘Happy Anniversary! Time and critique in International Relations theory’, Review of International Studies, vol. 33, no. S1, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1017/S0260210507007401

[253]
R. Wyn Jones, Critical theory and world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001.

[254]
R. Shapcott, ‘Critical Theory’, in The Oxford handbook of international relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

[255]
M. Kurki, ‘The Limitations of the Critical Edge: Reflections on Critical and Philosophical IR Scholarship Today’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 129–146, Sept. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0305829811411997

[256]
D. Campbell, ‘Poststructuralism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[257]
J. Edkins, ‘Poststructuralism’, in International relations theory for the twenty-first century: an introduction, London: Routledge, 2007.

[258]
D. Campbell and ebrary, Inc, Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity, Rev. ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10159576

[259]
D. Campbell and ebrary, Inc, National deconstruction: violence, identity, and justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10202555

[260]
M. J. Shapiro and J. Der Derian, International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics, vol. Issues in world politics. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989.

[261]
J. Edkins, Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2023.

[262]
J. George, Discourses of global politics: a critical (re)introduction to international relations. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1994.

[263]
R. B. J. Walker, Inside/outside: international relations as political theory, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

[264]
J. Bartelson, A genealogy of sovereignty, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

[265]
M. Dean, Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge, 1994. Available: https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5429999310002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[266]
M. Hardt and A. Negri, Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire. London: Penguin, 2006.

[267]
M. Hardt and A. Negri, Empire. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2001. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037307710002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[268]
S. Prozorov and ebrary, Inc, Foucault, freedom and sovereignty. Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2007. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10211498

[269]
R. B. J. Walker, After the globe, before the world, vol. Global horizons. London: Routledge, 2010.

[270]
D. Campbell and M. J. Shapiro, Moral spaces: rethinking ethics and world politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.

[271]
R. K. Ashley, ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 227–262, June 1988, doi: 10.1177/03058298880170020901

[272]
Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker, ‘Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 259–268, 1990, Available: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2600569?sid=21106237920623&uid=3738032&uid=4&uid=70&uid=2&uid=2129

[273]
J. Edkins, ‘Legality with a Vengeance: Famines and Humanitarian Relief in “Complex Emergencies”’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 547–575, Dec. 1996, doi: 10.1177/03058298960250030501

[274]
J. Edkins, ‘Ethics and Practices of Engagement: Intellectuals as Experts’, International Relations, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 64–69, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1177/0047117805050062

[275]
J. Huysmans, ‘Minding Exceptions: The Politics of Insecurity and Liberal Democracy’, Contemporary Political Theory, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 321–341, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300137

[276]
J. Edkins and V. Pin-Fat, ‘Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–24, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1177/03058298050340010101

[277]
PIN-FAT, VÉRONIQUE, ‘(Im)possible universalism: reading human rights in world politics’, Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 04, pp. 663–674, 2001, Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=62985

[278]
Maja Zehfuss, ‘Forget September 11’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 513–528, 2003, Available: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3993383?sid=21106237920623&uid=3738032&uid=4&uid=2&uid=2129&uid=70

[279]
S. N. Grovogui, Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans: race and self-determination in international law, 1st ed., vol. v. 3. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.

[280]
J. A. Tickner and L. Sjoberg, ‘Feminism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

[281]
J. True, ‘Feminism’, in Theories of international relations, 4th ed.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

[282]
C. Sylvester and ebrary, Inc, Feminist international relations: an unfinished journey, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10006827

[283]
J. A. Tickner, ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 611–632, Dec. 1997, doi: 10.1111/1468-2478.00060

[284]
Adam Jones, ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 405–429, 1996, Available: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/20097459?sid=21106237920623&uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=2129

[285]
CARVER, TERRELL; COCHRAN, MOLLY; SQUIRES, JUDITH, ‘Gendering Jones: feminisms, IRs, masculinities’, Review of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 02, pp. 283–297, 2000, Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=33581

[286]
R. O. Keohane, ‘Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 193–197, Mar. 1998, doi: 10.1111/0020-8833.00076

[287]
F. Halliday, Rethinking international relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994.

[288]
V. S. Peterson, ‘Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 183–206, June 1992, doi: 10.1177/03058298920210020401

[289]
J. A. Tickner, ‘Why Women Can’t Run the World: International Politics According to Francis Fukuyama’, International Studies Review, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 3–11, Dec. 1999, doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.00162

[290]
R. O. Keohane, ‘International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 245–253, June 1989, doi: 10.1177/03058298890180021001

[291]
C. Weber, ‘Good Girls, Little Girls, and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 337–349, June 1994, doi: 10.1177/03058298940230021401

[292]
C. H. Enloe, Bananas, beaches & bases: making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley.

[293]
C. H. Enloe, The morning after: sexual politics at the end of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.

[294]
J. Steans, Gender and international relations: an introduction. Oxford: Polity, 1998.

[295]
L. Sjoberg, C. E. Gentry, and ebrary, Inc, Women, gender, and terrorism, vol. Studies in security and international affairs. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2011. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10508843

[296]
L. Sjoberg, Gender and international security: feminist perspectives, vol. Routledge critical security studies series. London: Routledge, 2010.

[297]
J. A. Tickner, Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.

[298]
M. Zalewski, Feminist international relations: exquisite corpse. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013.

[299]
L. J. Shepherd and C. Hamilton, Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations, 3rd ed. Oxon, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2022. Available: https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=6156599790002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[300]
S. Biswas, ‘Postcolonialism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[301]
R. Abrahamsen, ‘Postcolonialism’, in International relations theory for the twenty-first century: an introduction, London: Routledge, 2007.

[302]
P. Bilgin, ‘Thinking past “Western” IR?’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 5–23, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1080/01436590701726392

[303]
G. Chowdhry and S. Nair, Power, postcolonialism and international relations: reading race, gender and class, vol. Routledge advances in international relations and global politics. London: Routledge, 2004.

[304]
S. Krishna, Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780742557642

[305]
L. H. M. Ling, Postcolonial international relations: conquest and desire between Asia and the West, vol. International political economy series. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.

[306]
R. L. Doty and ebrary, Inc, Imperial encounters: the politics of representation in North-South relations, vol. Borderlines. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10159633

[307]
A. Escobar and ebrary, Inc, Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World, vol. Princeton studies in culture/power/history. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10031960

[308]
J. Ferguson, The anti-politics machine: ‘development,’ depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.

[309]
A. Loomba, Colonialism - postcolonialism, 2nd. ed., vol. New critical idiom. Abingdon: Routledge, 2005. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203087596

[310]
P. Darby, At the edge of international relations: postcolonialism, gender and dependency. New York: Continuum, 2000.

[311]
R. Riley and N. Inayatullah, Interrogating imperialism: conversations on gender, race, and war. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780230601710

[312]
J. Edkins and M. Zehfuss, Global politics: a new introduction, Second edition. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2014. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203076897

[313]
J. Edkins and M. Zehfuss, Global politics: a new introduction, Second edition. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2014. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203076897

[314]
Kate Manzo, ‘Critical Humanism: Postcolonialism and Postmodern Ethics’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 381–408, 1997, Available: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40644896?sid=21106238545153&uid=2&uid=4&uid=70&uid=2129&uid=3738032

[315]
E. W. Said, Orientalism, vol. Penguin classics. London: Penguin, 2003.

[316]
C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, Marxism and the interpretation of culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988.

[317]
Shampa Biswas, ‘“Nuclear Apartheid” as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Resource?’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 485–522, 2001, Available: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40645031?sid=21106238578533&uid=3738032&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4

[318]
S. Biswas, ‘Empire and Global Public Intellectuals: Reading Edward Said as an International Relations Theorist’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 117–133, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1177/03058298070360010801

[319]
P. Bilgin, ‘Thinking past “Western” IR?’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 5–23, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1080/01436590701726392

[320]
P. Bilgin, ‘Looking for “the International” beyond the West’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 817–828, July 2010, doi: 10.1080/01436597.2010.502696

[321]
S. Seth, Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction, vol. Interventions. London: Routledge, 2013.

[322]
R. Shilliam, International relations and non-western thought: imperialism, colonialism, and investigations of global modernity, vol. Interventions. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2011. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3037254390002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415

[323]
T. Nardin, ‘International Political Theory’, in Theories of international relations, 4th ed.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

[324]
Toni Erskine, ‘Normative IR Theory’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[325]
C. R. Beitz and NetLibrary, Inc, Political theory and international relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999. Available: http://www.netLibrary.com/urlapi.asp?action=summary&v=1&bookid=99680

[326]
K. Booth, T. Dunne, and M. Cox, How might we live?: global ethics in a new century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

[327]
S. Caney, Justice beyond borders: a global political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

[328]
M. Frost and M. Frost, Ethics in international relations: a constitutive theory, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[329]
K. Hutchings, Global ethics: an introduction. Cambridge: Polity, 2010.

[330]
A. Linklater, Critical theory and world politics: citizenship, sovereignty and humanity. London: Routledge, 2007.

[331]
A. Linklater and London School of Economics and Political Science, Men and citizens in the theory of international relations, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics and Political Science, 1990.

[332]
D. Miller, National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780191528576

[333]
T. Nardin, Law, morality, and the relations of states. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983.

[334]
P. Sutch, Ethics, justice, and international relations: constructing an international community, vol. Routledge advances in international relations and politics. New York: Routledge, 2001.

[335]
K.-C. Tan, Justice without borders: cosmopolitanism, nationalism, and patriotism, vol. Contemporary political theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780511316609

[336]
M. Walzer, Thick and thin: moral agrument at home and abroad. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994.

[337]
M. Walzer, Spheres of justice: a defence of pluralism and equality. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.

[338]
A. Linklater, ‘The Evolving Spheres of International Justice’, International Affairs, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 473–482, July 1999, doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.00088

[339]
O. O’NEILL, ‘Bounded and cosmopolitan justice’, Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 05, Dec. 2000, doi: 10.1017/S0260210500000450

[340]
W. Bain, Between anarchy and society: trusteeship and the obligations of power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

[341]
C. R. Beitz, ‘Social and Cosmopolitan Liberalism’, International Affairs, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 515–529, July 1999, doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.00091

[342]
J. Brassett and D. Bulley, ‘Ethics in World Politics: Cosmopolitanism and Beyond?’, International Politics, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800155

[343]
Chris Brown, ‘The House That Chuck Built: Twenty-Five Years of Reading Charles Beitz’, Review of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 371–379, 2005, Available: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40072103?sid=21106238986013&uid=2&uid=4&uid=70&uid=3738032&uid=2129

[344]
M. Wight, ‘Why is there no International Theory?’, in International theory: critical investigations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.

[345]
R. Cox, ‘The point is not just to explain the World but to change It’, in The Oxford handbook of international relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

[346]
T. Dunne, L. Hansen, and C. Wight, ‘The end of International Relations theory?’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 405–425, Sept. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1354066113495485

[347]
Y. H. Ferguson, ‘Diversity in IR Theory: Pluralism as an Opportunity for Understanding Global Politics’, International Studies Perspectives, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3–12, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1111/insp.12092

[348]
C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, The Oxford handbook of international relations, vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

[349]
S. Smith, ‘The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: “Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline”’, International Studies Review, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 67–85, Sept. 2002, doi: 10.1111/1521-9488.00255

[350]
J. Edkins and M. Zehfuss, Global politics: a new introduction, Second edition. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2014. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780203076897

[351]
H. Bull, K. Alderson, A. Hurrell, and NetLibrary, Inc, Hedley Bull on international society. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press, 2000. Available: http://www.netLibrary.com/urlapi.asp?action=summary&v=1&bookid=61053

[352]
R. G. Collingwood, The idea of history, vol. Oxford paperbacks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.

[353]
J. Edkins, Trauma and the memory of politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

[354]
C. Elman and M. F. Elman, Bridges and boundaries: historians, political scientists, and the study of international relations, vol. BCSIA studies in international security. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2001.

[355]
John Lewis Gaddis, ‘International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War’, International Security, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 5–58, 1993, Available: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2539129?sid=21106239130283&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=3738032&uid=70&uid=4

[356]
J. M. Hobson and ebrary, Inc, The state and international relations, vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=2000778

[357]
John M. Hobson, ‘The Historical Sociology of the State and the State of Historical Sociology in International Relations’, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 284–320, 1998, Available: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4177267?sid=21106239150993&uid=2129&uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4

[358]
M. W. Doyle and G. J. Ikenberry, New thinking in international relations theory. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1997.

[359]
M. A. Neufeld, The restructuring of international relations theory, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. New York, N.Y: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

[360]
N. J. Rengger and ebrary, Inc, International relations, political theory, and the problem of order: beyond international relations theory?, vol. The New international relations. London: Routledge, 2000. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10017509

[361]
M. Wight, G. Wight, B. Porter, and Royal Institute of International Affairs, International theory: the three traditions. Leicester: Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1991.

[362]
A. B. Tickner and O. Wæver, International relations: scholarship around the world, vol. Worlding beyond the West. London: Routledge, 2009.

[363]
M. J. Shapiro and J. Der Derian, International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics, vol. Issues in world politics. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989.

[364]
R. B. J. Walker, Inside/outside: international relations as political theory, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

[365]
S. Smith, ‘Introduction’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[366]
M. Kurki and C. Wight, ‘Chapter 1 of International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[367]
T. Dunne, L. Hansen, and C. Wight, ‘The end of International Relations theory?’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 405–425, Sept. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1354066113495485

[368]
N. Lebow, ‘Classical Realism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[369]
Andreas Osiander, ‘Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 409–432, 1998, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600745?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[370]
Wilson, Peter, ‘The myth of the “First Great Debate”’, Review of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 05, pp. 1–16, 2001, Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=71437&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210598000011

[371]
BAIN, WILLIAM, ‘Deconfusing Morgenthau: moral inquiry and classical realism reconsidered’, Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 03, pp. 445–464, 2000, Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=54165&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0260210500004459

[372]
J. Mearsheimer, ‘Chapter 4’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[373]
J. Sterling-Folker, ‘Chapter 6’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[374]
T. Dunne, ‘Chapter 7’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[375]
Kenneth N. Waltz, ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’, International Security, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5–41, 2000, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[376]
Robert O. Keohane and Lisa L. Martin, ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’, International Security, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 39–51, 1995, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539214?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[377]
‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 5–49, Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/summary/v019/19.3.mearsheimer.html

[378]
H. Bull, ‘Society and Anarchy in International Relations’, in International theory: critical investigations, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.

[379]
K. Fierke, ‘Constructivism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[380]
Alexander Wendt, ‘Constructing International Politics’, International Security, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 71–81, 1995, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[381]
Alexander Wendt, ‘Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 391–425, 1992, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[382]
Ted Hopf, ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 171–200, 1998, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539267?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[383]
Mark Rupert, ‘Marxism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[384]
S. Gill, ‘New constitutionalism, democratisation and global political economy∗’, Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 23–38, Feb. 1998, doi: 10.1080/14781159808412845

[385]
R. Cox, ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders’, in Neorealism and its critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

[386]
S. Roach, ‘Critical Theory’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[387]
D. Campbell, ‘Poststructuralism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[388]
Ken Booth, ‘Human Wrongs and International Relations’, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 103–126, 1995, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2624012?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[389]
Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker, ‘Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 259–268, 1990, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600569?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[390]
M. Kurki, ‘The Limitations of the Critical Edge: Reflections on Critical and Philosophical IR Scholarship Today’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 129–146, Sept. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0305829811411997

[391]
S. Grovogui, ‘Postcolonialism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[392]
J. A. Tickner and L. Sjoberg, ‘Feminism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[393]
Shampa Biswas, ‘“Nuclear Apartheid” as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Resource?’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 485–522, 2001, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40645031?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[394]
J. Ann Tickner, ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 611–632, 1997, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[395]
T. Erskine, ‘Normative Theory’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds, Third edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

[396]
H. Nau, ‘Scholarship and policy-making: who speaks truth to whom?’, in The Oxford handbook of international relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

[397]
SMITH, STEVE, ‘Power and truth; a reply to William Wallace’, Review of International Studies, vol. 23, no. 04, pp. 507–516, 2000, Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=33515&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S026021059700507X

[398]
Review by: William Wallace, ‘Review: Truth and Power, Monks and Technocrats: Theory and Practice in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 301–321, 1996, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097450?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[399]
Ken Booth, ‘Discussion: A Reply to Wallace’, Review of International Studies, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 371–377, 1997, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097487?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[400]
S. Krishna, Globalization and postcolonialism: hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shibboleth.aber.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780742557642

[401]
C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, The Oxford handbook of international relations, vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Bibliography for IP30120 International Political Theory Today BETA