1.
Theimer K, ed. Appraisal and Acquisition: Innovative Practices for Archives and Special Collections. Rowman & Littlefield; 2015. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=4810223070002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
2.
Roe K. Arranging & Describing Archives & Manuscripts. Vol Archival fundamentals series. II. Society of American Archivists; 2005.
3.
Theimer K, ed. Description. Vol Innovative practices for archives and special collections. Rowman & Littlefield; 2014. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780810890947
4.
International Council on Archives. International Council on Archives Code of Ethics.; 1996. http://www.ica.org/en/ica-code-ethics
5.
International Council on Archives. ISAD(G): General International Standard Archival Description.; 2000. https://www.ica.org/resource/isadg-general-international-standard-archival-description-second-edition/
6.
Williams C. Managing Archives: Foundations, Principles and Practice. Vol Chandos information professional series. Chandos; 2006.
7.
Robyns MC. Using Functional Analysis in Archival Appraisal: A Practical and Effective Alternative to Traditional Appraisal Methodologies. Rowman & Littlefield; 2014. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=4841473040002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
8.
Jenkinson H. A Manual of Archive Administration. 2nd ed. reprinted. Lund, Humphries; 1965. https://archive.org/stream/manualofarchivea00jenkuoft#page/n7/mode/2up
9.
Arts Council England. Acceptance in Lieu. https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/tax-incentives/acceptance-lieu
10.
The National Archives. Applying for Grant Aid. Published online 2004. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/applying_grant_aid.pdf
11.
The National Archives. Archive Collection Policy Statements: Checklist of Suggested Contents. Published online 2004. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/+/https:/www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/archive-collection-policy.pdf
12.
Abraham T. Collection policy or documentation strategy: theory and practice. American Archivist. 1991;54(Winter). http://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227
13.
Kitching C, Hart I. Collection policy statements. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 1995;16(1):7-14. doi:10.1080/00379819509511756
14.
Cultural Gifts Scheme and Acceptance in Lieu - report 2021. Published online 2021. https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/CGSAILAnnualReport2021%20%281%29.pdf
15.
Abraham T. Documentary Strategies: A Decade (or More) Later. Published 1995. http://webpages.uidaho.edu/special-collections/papers/docstr10.htm
16.
Department for Digital, Culture Media & Sport. Export of Objects of Cultural Interest 2018-19 and 2019-20. Published online 2021. https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/RCEWA_annual_report%20%2718%2619_%2719%2620.pdf
17.
Arts Council England. Export licensing. http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/what-we-do/supporting-museums/cultural-property/export-controls/export-licensing/
18.
Goodison N. Goodison Review securing the best for our museums: Private giving and Government support. Published online 2004. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20050301200356/http://hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/B9D/02/ACF10B6.pdf
19.
The National Archives. Loan (deposit) agreements for privately owned archives. Published online 2006. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/+/https:/www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/loanagreement.pdf
20.
Tullock J, Alexandra C. Logjam: an audit of uncatalogued collections in the North West. Published online 2004. http://web.archive.org/web/20060926174216/http://www.mlanorthwest.org.uk/assets/documents/10000070Logjamfullreport.pdf
21.
Sims RMC. Obligations and aftercare: the depositor and service standard agreements. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2003;24(2):215-221. doi:10.1080/0037981032000127061
22.
Arts Council England. Reviewing committee. https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/supporting-collections-and-cultural-property/reviewing-committee
23.
The National Archives. Surveying historical manuscripts: some guidelines. Published online 2006. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/archives/surveying-historical-manuscripts.pdf
24.
HM Government. Tax relief for national heritage assets - Detailed guidance. Published 2013. https://www.gov.uk/tax-relief-for-national-heritage-assets
25.
Hackman LJ, Warnow-Blewett J. The documentation strategy process: a model and a case study. American Archivist. 1987;50(Winter):12-47. http://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.50.1.uxr6766121033766
26.
Dicken J. Twentieth century literary archives: Collecting policies and research initiatives. In: New Directions in Archival Research. Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies; 2000.
27.
Helen Willa Samuels. Who controls the past. American Archivist. 1986;49(2). http://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.49.2.t76m2130txw40746
28.
Tschan RA. A comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on appraisal. American Archivist. 2002;65(Fall/Winter). http://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.65.2.920w65g3217706l1
29.
Larkin P. A neglected responsibility: contemporary literary manuscripts. In: Required Writing: Miscellaneous Pieces 1955-1982. Faber; 1983.
30.
The National Archives. Acquisition and Disposition Strategy.; 2007. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/acquisition-strategy.pdf
31.
Cook, Terry. Appraisal methodology: Macro appraisal and functional analysis. Part A: Concept and theory. Published online 2000. http://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/services/government-information-resources/disposition/Documents/MacroappraisalPartA.pdf
32.
Menne-Haritz A. Appraisal or documentation: Can we appraise archives by selecting content? American Archivist. 1994;57(3). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40293851?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
33.
The National Archives. Appraisal Policy.; 2012. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/appraisal_policy.pdf
34.
The National Archives. Appraisal toolkits. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/projects-and-work/appraisal.htm
35.
Baerlett, N. Appraising university records: A retrospective analysis. Published online 2001. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~deromedi/module/nbdisc.htm
36.
Reed B. Archival appraisal. In: Keeping Archives. 2nd ed. Thorpe in association with the Australian Society of Archivists; 1993.
37.
Boles F, Young JM. Archival Appraisal. Neal-Schuman Publishers; 1991.
38.
Couture C. Archival appraisal, a status report. Archivaria. 1995;59. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12502/13624
39.
Craig BL, Thomson Gale (Firm). Archival Appraisal: Theory and Practice. K.G. Saur; 2004. http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/eBooks?ste=22&docNum=CX3453399999&q=uniaber
40.
Ham FG. Archival choices: Managing the historical record in an age of abundance. American Archivist. 1984;47(Winter). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40292632?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
41.
Brichford MJ, Society of American Archivists. Archives and Manuscripts: Appraisal and Accessioning. Vol Basic manual series. Society of Archivists; 1977.
42.
Jimerson R. Archives and manuscripts: deciding what to save. OCLC Systems & Services. 2003;19(4). http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/10650750310508108
43.
Walters TO. Contemporary archival appraisal methods and preservation decision-making. American Archivist. 1996;59(Summer). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40293990
44.
Pearce N. Deciding what to save: Fifty years of theory and practice. In: Archival Choices: Managing the Historical Record in an Age of Abundance. Vol The Lexington Books special series in libraries and librarianship. Lexington Books; 1984:1-18.
45.
Harvey, Ross. Digital Curation Manual Instalment on Appraisal and Selection.; 2007. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/webfm_send/121
46.
Abraham, Terry. Documentation Strategies: A Decade (or More) Later.; 1995. https://www.lib.uidaho.edu/special-collections/t-abraham/docstr10.htm
47.
Greene MA, Daniels-Howell TJ. Documentation with an attitude: A pragmatist’s guide to the selection and acquisition to modern business records. In: The Records of American Business. Society of American Archivists; 1997.
48.
Jimerson R. Embracing the power of archives. The American Archivist. 2006;69(1). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40294309
49.
Boles, F., Greene, M.A. Et tu Schellenberg? Thoughts on the dagger of American appraisal theory. American Archivist. 1996;59(Summer). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40293988
50.
Doylen, Michael. Experiments in deaccessioning: Archives and online auctions. American Archivist. 2001;64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40294176
51.
Boles, F. Exploring the black box: The appraisal of university administrative records. American Archivist. 1985;48(2). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40292740
52.
Bailey, C. From top down: The practice of macro-appraisal. Archivaria. 1997;43(Spring). http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12177/13188
53.
Whyte, Angus, Wilson, Andrew. How to Appraise and Select Research Data for Curation.; 2010. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides/appraise-select-data
54.
Benedict, K. Invitation to a bonfire: Reappraisal and de-accessioning of records as collection management tools in an Archives – A reply to Leonard Rapport. American Archivist. 1984;47(Winter). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40292635
55.
Stapleton, R. Jenkinson and Schellenberg: a comparison. Archivaria. 1983;17. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11021/11956
56.
Cook, Terry. Macro-appraisal and functional analysis: documenting governance rather than government. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2004;25. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0037981042000199106
57.
Brown, R. Macro-appraisal theory and the context of the public records creator. Archivaria. 1995;40. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12102/13094
58.
Cook, Terry. Macroappraisal in theory and practice: Origins, characteristics and implementation in Canada, 1950-2000. Archival Science. 2005;4. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10502-005-9010-2#page-1
59.
Boles, F. Mix two parts interest to one part information and appraise until done: Understanding contemporary record selection processes. American Archivist. 1987;50(Summer). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40293134
60.
Schellenberg TR. Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. Society of American Archivists; 2003. http://www.archivists.org/publications/epubs/ModernArchives-Schellenberg.pdf
61.
Jenkinson H. Modern Archives. Some Reflections on T R Schellenberg.; 1980.
62.
Cox RJ. No Innocent Deposits: Forming Archives by Rethinking Appraisal. Scarecrow Press; 2004. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9781417503704
63.
The National Archives. Operational selection policies. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/projects-and-work/osp-number.htm
64.
Ide, M., Weisse, L. Recommended Appraisal Guidelines for Selecting Born Digital Master Programs for Preservation and Deposit with the Library of Congress.; 2006. http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/partners/documents/pdpt_appraisal_guidelines2006.pdf
65.
Eastwood, T. Reflections on the goal of archival appraisal in democratic societies. Archivaria. 2002;54. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12855/14080
66.
Booms, Hans. Society and the formation of a documentary heritage: Issues in the appraisal of archival sources. Archivaria. 1987;24. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11415/12357
67.
Williams, Caroline. Studying reality: the application of theory in an aspect of UK practice. Archivaria. 2006;62. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12889/14120
68.
Jenkinson H. The choice of records for preservation in wartime: some practical hints. In: Selected Writings of Sir Hilary Jenkinson. ; 1980.
69.
Mercer, H. The National Archives Appraisal Policy: Background Paper – the Grigg System and Beyond.; 2004. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/background_appraisal.pdf
70.
Schellenberg, T.R. The Appraisal of Modern Public Records. National Archives Bulletin 8.; 1956. http://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/appraisal-of-records.html
71.
Duranti, Luciana. The concept of appraisal and archival theory. American Archivist. 1994;57(Spring). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40293824
72.
Hackman, L.J. The documentation strategy process: A model and a case study. American Archivist. 1987;50(Winter). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40294347
73.
Cox, R.J. The end of collecting: Towards a new purpose for archival appraisal. Archival Science. 2002;2. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02435626
74.
Bearman, D., Lytle, R. The power and principle of provenance. Archivaria. 1985;21. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11231/12170
75.
Day M. The selection, appraisal and retention of digital scientific data: the ERPANET / CODATA workshop. Ariadne. 2004;(39). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue39/erpanet-rpt/
76.
Hull, F. The Use of Sampling Techniques in the Retention of Records: A RAMP Study with Guidelines.; 1981. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0004/000474/047452e.pdf
77.
Foote, K.E. To remember and forget: Archives, memory, and culture. American Archivist. 1990;53. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40293469
78.
Cook T. We are what we keep: We keep what we are: Archival appraisal past, present and future. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2011;32(2). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00379816.2011.619688
79.
Cook T. What is past is prologue: A history of archival ideas since 1898 and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria. 1997;43(Spring). http://www.mybestdocs.com/cookt-pastprologue-ar43fnl.htm
80.
Samuels, H.W. Who controls the past. American Archivist. 1986;49(Spring). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40292980
81.
Momryk, Myron. "National significance ”: The evolution and development of acquisition strategies in the manuscript division , National Archives of Canada. Archivaria: the Journal of the Association of Canadian Archivists. 2001;52(Fall). http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12819/14031
82.
Yakel, Elizabeth. Archival representation. Archival Science. 2003;3(1). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02438926
83.
Cook T. Archival science and postmodernism: New formulations for old concepts. Archival Science. 2000;1(1). https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF02435636.pdf
84.
Nesmith T, Society of American Archivists, Association of Canadian Archivists. Archival studies in English-speaking Canada and the North American rediscovery of provenance. In: Canadian Archival Studies and the Rediscovery of Provenance. Scarecrow Press; 1993.
85.
Scott, Peter J, Finlay, G. Archives and Administrative Change: Some Methods and Approaches (Part I). Archives and Manuscripts. 1978;7.
86.
Cook, Terry, Schwartz, Joan M. Archives, records and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Archival Science. 2002;2(3-4). http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02435620
87.
Miller FM. Arranging and Describing Archives and Manuscripts. Vol Archival fundamentals series. Society of American Archivists; 1990.
88.
Goldman R. Derangement and Description: A chaotic little archives webcomic. https://derangementanddescription.wordpress.com/
89.
Boles, F. Disrespecting original order. American Archivist. 1982;45(1). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40292457
90.
Cook, Terry. Fashionable nonsense or professional rebirth: Postmodernism and the practice of archives. Archivaria. 2001;51(Spring). http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12792/13989
91.
Clanchy MT. From Memory to Written Record: England 1066-1307. 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9781118295991
92.
Meehan J. Making the Leap from Parts to Whole: Evidence and Inference in Archival Arrangement and Description. American Archivist. 2009;72(1). http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40294596.pdf
93.
Muller S, Feith JA, Fruin R. Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives. 2nd ed. Wilson; 1968.
94.
Schellenberg TR. Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. Society of American Archivists; 2003.
95.
Anchor R. ‘More product less process’: method, madness or practice? Archives & Records. 2013;34(2). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23257962.2013.818937
96.
Brothman, Brien. Orders of value: Probing the theoretical terms of archival practice. Archivaria. 1991;32. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11761/12711
97.
Macneil, Heather. Picking our text: Archival description, authenticity, and the archivist as editor. American Archivist. 2005;68(2 (Fall-Winter)). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40294291
98.
Dwiggins DM. Putting the ‘Where’ in the Archives: Internet Mapping and Archival Records. Library Student Journal. Published 2010. http://web.archive.org/web/20130411082237/http://www.librarystudentjournal.org/index.php/lsj/article/view/112/275
99.
Parker, Elizabeth. Records life cycle structure study. Published online 2002. https://web.archive.org/web/20110126043435/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/generalpublications/2002/recordssrlstructure.aspx#B
100.
Wells E. Related Material – The Arrangement and Description of Family Papers. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2012;33(2):167-184. doi:10.1080/00379816.2012.722528
101.
Duff W, Harris V. Stories and names: Archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Archival Science. 2002;2(3-4). http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02435625
102.
Cook T. The concept of the archival fonds in the post-custodial era: Theory, problems and solutions. Archivaria. 1993;35. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11882/12835
103.
Millar, Laura. The death of the fonds and the resurrection of provenance: Archival context in space and time. Archivaria. 2002;53. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12833/14048
104.
Horsman, Peter. The last dance of the phoenix, or the re-discovery of the archival fonds. Archivaria. 2002;54. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12853/14076
105.
Hurley C. The making and keeping of records: (1) What are finding aids for. Archives and Manuscripts. 1998;26(1). http://descriptionguy.com/images/WEBSITE/the-making-and-the-keeping-of-records-part1.pdf
106.
Duranti L. Origin and development of the concept of description. Archivaria. 1993;35. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11884/12837
107.
Bearman D, Lytle R. The power and principle of provenance. Archivaria. 1985;21. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11231/12170
108.
Scott PJ. The record group concept: A case for abandonment. American Archivist. 1966;29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40290645
109.
International Dunhuang Project. The Silk Road online. http://idp.bl.uk/
110.
Duchein, Michel. Theoretical principles and practical problems of respect des fonds in archival science. Archivaria. 1983;16. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12648/13813
111.
Cook, Terry. What is past is prologue: A history of archival ideas since 1898 and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria. 1997;43(Spring). http://www.mybestdocs.com/cookt-pastprologue-ar43fnl.htm
112.
Beattie, Heather. Where narratives meet: Archival description, provenance, and women’s diaries. Libraries and the Cultural Record. 2009;44(1). http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/libraries_and_culture/v044/44.1.beattie.html
113.
Kaplan, Deborah, Sauer, Anne, Wilczek, Eliot. Archival description in OAI-ORE. Journal of Digital Information. 2011;12(2). http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/1814/1769
114.
Yakel, Elizabeth. Archival representation. Archival Science. 2003;3(1). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02438926
115.
Hensen SL. Archives, Personal Papers, and Manuscripts: A Cataloging Manual for Archival Repositories, Historical Societies, and Manuscript Libraries. [Manuscript Division, Library of Congress]; 1983.
116.
Miller FM. Arranging and Describing Archives and Manuscripts. Vol Archival fundamentals series. Society of American Archivists; 1990.
117.
O’Brien, Jeff. Basic RAD: A short introduction. Published online 1997. https://www.scaa.sk.ca/fileadmin/scaa/storage/800-Education/804-Educational_Publications/Basic_rad.pdf
118.
Weber LB. Record Formatting: MARC AMC. In: Describing Archival Materials: The Use of the Marc AMC Format. Routledge; 1990.
119.
Australian Society of Archivists. Committee on Descriptive Standards. Describing Archives in Context: A Guide to Australian Practice. Australian Society of Archivists, Committee on Descriptive Standards; 2005.
120.
Peters V. Developing archival context standards for functions in the higher education sector. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2005;26(1). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00039810500047458
121.
Bunn J. Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action. Archives and Records. 2013;34(2). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23257962.2013.830066
122.
EAD Working Group. Development of the encoded archival description DTD. Published online 1998. http://www.loc.gov/ead/eaddev.html
123.
van Ballegooie M, Duff W. Digital Curation Manual: Instalment on archival metadata. Published online 2006. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/resource/curation-manual/chapters/archival-metadata/archival-metadata.pdf
124.
Technical Subcommittee on Encoded Archival Description. EAD revision. Published online 2013. https://www2.archivists.org/groups/technical-subcommittee-on-encoded-archival-description-ead-disbanded/ead-revision
125.
Goss S. Facilitating access to archival material: The creation of EAD records for the online archive of California. PNLA Quarterly. 2013;77(2). https://pnla.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/volume-77-2.pdf
126.
Gateway to Archives of Scottish Higher Education (GASHE). GASHE standard for creating activity descriptions. Published online 2006. http://www.gashe.ac.uk/about/standard.html
127.
Archives and Records Association. Guide to standards. http://www.archives.org.uk/si-dsg/guide-to-standards.html
128.
Stevenson, A, Stevenson, J. Lifting the lid on linked data: Linked data and the LOCAH project. Published online 2011. http://locah.archiveshub.ac.uk/tag/modelling/
129.
Hooland S van, Verborgh R. Linked Data for Libraries, Archives and Museums: How to Clean, Link and Publish Your Metadata. Facet Publishing; 2014.
130.
Shepherd, Elizabeth, Pringle, R. Mapping descriptive standards across domains: A comparison of ISAD(G) and SPECTRUM. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2002;23(1). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00379810220120537
131.
Procter M, Cook M. Manual of Archival Description. Third edition. Routledge; 2016. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=4634718840002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
132.
Anarchivist. My Journey With Encoded Archival Description. Published online 14AD. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbRjil4yeDU
133.
Yeo, Geoffrey. New approaches to archival description Standards for archival description " The need for descriptive standards is no longer a subject for debate ”. Published online 2008. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/infostudies/geoffrey-yeo/description.pdf
134.
Walch, V. I. Standards for archival description: A handbook. Published online 1994. http://www.archivists.org/catalog/stds99/
135.
The Society of American Archivists. Statement of principles for the CUSTARD Project. http://www.archivists.org/news/custardproject.asp
136.
Ruch A. Supporting interoperability of distributed archives using authority controlled ontologies. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwjrm42J8-zdAhWJK8AKHekwATgQFjAAegQICRAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alliancepermanentaccess.org%2Fpv%2Fpv2009%2FPV2009%2F43_Ruch_Interoperability_in_distributed_archives_with_Authority_controlled_Ontologies_Proceedings.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0GlBaBDDhoYV1f21p8TL0S
137.
Shepherd, Elizabeth, Smith, C. The application of ISAD(G) to the description of archival datasets. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2000;21(1). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00379810050006911
138.
Hurley C. The Australian (‘series’) system: An exposition. In: The Records Continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives First Fifty Years: Ian Maclean’s and Australian Archives First Fifty Years. National Archives of Australia. http://descriptionguy.com/images/WEBSITE/the-australian-%28Series%29-system.pdf
139.
Caswell M. Using classification to convict the Khmer Rouge. Journal of Documentation. 2012;68(2):162-184. doi:10.1108/00220411211209177
140.
Zhang J, Mauney D. When archival description meets digital object metadata: A typological study of digital archival representation. The American Archivist. 2013;76(1). https://watermark.silverchair.com/aarc_76_1_121u85342062w155.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAykwggMlBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggMWMIIDEgIBADCCAwsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMUC4gQxGvd4hpu5LoAgEQgIIC3BN6q5cJt7xPcY2EEV_4GjN0xjAB9dtx_4rtqJvQhDSg8WvGw-oyfLnOdUblcKh9nBjcvV_DkuDQGNVhfTzCajmHDBGdm98v7DgELAFOZIF5vKWzFb9EGZbUee0dshwQfV9L3tIpRUFV9qJI0Y2pn36rIsKhdEqnWVsab7mFgQ9Rd3QmCv610wvXK33kFBc5U6aBKgF3q0GIG_2zTnsFy_TLkrwG2fQMLUVu60JRRMZ-xbxhIkf_HPxnasPXLR_A5ppANW4CRqO3nvhx77f4q_UCfAdkzrXt1zF1LZR3tuORGu7IlwPy7yR4rExTbEGRiLTv_CvQL8slk2NntSi2eKTy6h4k28kCPWpowGeAf2l-zM0uKDsvFU2vlam4s7jtq0DMR1GKDv1eA09FckAONHYB5KxzMcCNbSmcPZoNn4LLqlSDPeqSdEYK1rr9psfn4EpBvfEHeofZT8ZDTqWJv4tOvKBM9o7nvTtHIDwPYhKL-MV2rezskJBFBsfXE4dFEP4KuFivUk-deUcrM80L0uWuUikKuNJG5Lyg4ljv9T7YG17d3bOOXcQMfPHLdF8XFrkRzq3vbkVB77CCZygwkCNq0gdFEer9KKhFuacaFFgJoV-wud5iXBkpwiy9J0aGfwF8nKP-Ti5i9X4WrthDnkAkvs2wP218kp7NtLbssPXlkJs3hvVAyQCFeL3uhoH-_0OecKrpMG23HMtmIpzS44OTpGWGXPd8rDwJt9qHSCx9vzP2e1OlxvjgxA-lo1izFdA-0qnZ-QaP6wcXFDWe4Einb-VD8mW4vIdyf96SxkUnYx-3nt4MHgHIcgS4kQKmI_gCi0CJ2yaMAaCLogxXfZak3nPpp6SZVTA4DImZ9zBhyhXoqqYwPr-FjEv9UqLhFFC19KKiY9W0V1PU2IJNuaagHpxVOQwKASXefauFj-lelFJH1bdgiluUwcGmNf7P_eoGWZ42XqtF0-rtcw
141.
Mortimer, I. ARCHON and the indexes to the National Register of Archives: Past, present and future. Program: Electronic Libraries and Information Systems. 1999;33. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/EUM0000000006918
142.
N2T. Archival resource key (ARK) identifiers. http://n2t.net/e/ark_ids.html
143.
Getty Research Institute. Art and architecture thesaurus online. Published online 2000. http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/aat/index.html
144.
W3C. Date and time formats. Published online 1997. http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime
145.
Local Government Association. Integrated public sector vocabulary. https://standards.esd.org.uk/?uri=list%2Fsubjects
146.
International Council on Archives. ISAAR (CPF): International standard archival authority record for corporate bodies, persons and families, 2nd Edition. Published online 2011. https://www.ica.org/en/isaar-cpf-international-standard-archival-authority-record-corporate-bodies-persons-and-families-2nd
147.
Library of Congress. Library of congress authorities. http://authorities.loc.gov
148.
National Council on Archives. National Council on Archives: Rules for the Construction of Personal, Place and Corporate Names. Published 1997. http://archiveshub.ac.uk/ncarules/
149.
Davidson, J. Persistent identifiers. Published online 2006. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/briefing-papers/introduction-curation/persistent-identifiers
150.
Cox, E, Czechowski, L. Subject access points in the MARC record and archival finding aid: Enough or too many? Journal of Archival Organization. 2007;5(4). http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=morris_articles
151.
Ribeiro, F. Subject indexing and authority control in archives: The need for subject indexing in archives and for an indexing policy using controlled language. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 1996;17(1).
152.
DOI. The DOI system: Factsheets. Published online 2011. http://www.doi.org/factsheets.html
153.
Vitali, S. The second edition of ISAAR(CPF) and authority control in systems for archival descriptive systems. http://www.sba.unifi.it/ac/relazioni/vitali_eng.pdf
154.
University of London Computer Centre. UK archival thesaurus. http://www.ukat.org.uk/
155.
UNESCO. UNESCO thesaurus. http://databases.unesco.org/thesaurus/
156.
Garrod, P. Use of the UNESCO thesaurus for subject indexing at UK NDAD. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2000;21(1). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00379810050006902
157.
Corporation for National Research Initiatives. Welcome to the handle system. http://www.handle.net
158.
Higgins, Richard. A case study of EAD implementation at Durham University Library Archives and Special Collections. Archives and Museum Informatics. 1998;12. http://www.springerlink.com/content/n2xj61088p021702/fulltext.pdf
159.
Society of American Archivists. A Different Kind of Web: New Connections between Archives and Our Users. (Theimer K, ed.). Society of American Archivists; 2011.
160.
Morris, L. Developing a cooperative intra-institutional approach to EAD implementation: The Harvard/Radcliffe digital findings aids project. American Archivist. 1997;60(Fall). http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40294056.pdf?acceptTC=true&jpdConfirm=true
161.
EAD Working Group. Development of the encoded archival description DTD. Published online 1998. http://www.loc.gov/ead/eaddev.html
162.
Hill, Amanda, Stockting, William, Higgins, Sarah. Different strokes for different folks: Presenting EAD in three UK online catalogues. Journal of Archival Organization. 2006;(2-3):183-195. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1300/J201v03n02_14
163.
Kiesling, K. EAD as an archival descriptive standard. American Archivist. 1997;60.
164.
Encoded Archival Context Working Group. Encoded archival context: Corporate bodies, persons and families. Published online 2011. http://eac.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/
165.
Pitti, Daniel. Encoded Archival Description. An introduction and overview. D-Lib Magazine. 1999;5(11). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november99/11pitti.html
166.
Stockting, William, Queyroux, F. Encoding across Frontiers. Journal of Archival Organization 3 (2/3); 2004.
167.
EAD Working Group. Encoded archival description tag library version 2002 - EAD technical document No. 2. Published online 2002. http://www.loc.gov/ead/tglib/index.html
168.
Johnston, D. From typescript finding aids to EAD (Encoded Archival Description). A university case study. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2001;22(1). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00379810120037496
169.
Committee of Inquiry into the Changing Learner Experience. Higher Education in a Web 2.0 World.; 2009. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/heweb20rptv1.pdf
170.
Bouché, Nicole. Implementing EAD in the Yale University Library. American Archivist. 1997;60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40294057
171.
Higgins S, Inglis G. Implementing EAD: the experience of the NAHSTE project. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2003;24(2):199-214. doi:10.1080/0037981032000127052
172.
Fox, M. Implementing encoded archival description: An overview of administrative and technical considerations. American Archivist. 1997;60(3). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40294441
173.
King, K. Introduction to Web 2.0 for archives. http://www.slideshare.net/araik/web-20-and-archives
174.
EAD Practices Working Group. Library of Congress Encoded Archival Description Best Practices.; 2008. http://www.loc.gov/rr/ead/lcp/lcp.pdf
175.
Miller DR, Clarke KS, ebrary, Inc. Putting XML to Work in the Library: Tools for Improving Access and Management. American Library Association; 2004. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/aber/Doc?id=10194636
176.
RLG EAD Advisory Group. RLG Best Practice Guidelines for Encoded Archival Description.; 2002. http://www.oclc.org/resources/research/activities/ead/bpg.pdf
177.
Hajo, C. Scholarly editing in a Web 2.0 world. Published online 2009. https://wp.nyu.edu/archivesandpublichistory/people-2/cathy-moran-hajo/scholarly-editing-in-a-web-2-0-world/
178.
Prom, Chris. The EAD cookbook. A survey and usability study. American Archivist. 2002;65(2). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40294209
179.
Stevenson, J. The impact of Web 2.0 on archives. Published online 2010. http://www.slideshare.net/JaneStevenson/the-impact-of-web-20-on-archives
180.
Daines JG, Nimer CL. The Interactive Archivist. Published 2009. http://interactivearchivist.archivists.org/
181.
Sweet, Meg. The internationalisation of EAD (Encoded Archival Description). Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2001;22(1). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00379810120037487
182.
Theimer KM. Web 2.0 Tools and Strategies for Archives and Local History Collections. Facet; 2010.
183.
Stockdale, R. The retrospective conversion of the British Library manuscripts catalogues: A description of the project. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2000;21(2). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/713683213
184.
Tennant R. XML in Libraries. Neal-Schuman Publishers; 2002.
185.
Godby CJ, Young JA, Childress E. A Repository of Metadata Crosswalks. D-Lib Magazine. 2004;10(12). doi:10.1045/december2004-godby
186.
Archives and Records Council Wales. Archives Network Wales Project Evaluation: Results of a User Survey , July-August 2005.; 2005. http://anwc.llgc.org.uk/pdfs/onlineuser.pdf
187.
Kingsley, Nick. Archives Task Force Discussion Paper 3: The Electronic "National Archives Network”.; 2003. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20111013135435/research.mla.gov.uk/evidence/documents/atf_dis03_pdf_5514.pdf
188.
Hill, Amanda. Bringing archives online with the Archives Hub. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2002;23(2). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0037981022000006408
189.
Home, Rebecca. Crowdsourcing brings historical archive online. Published online 2011. http://blogs.wsj.com/photojournal/2011/10/20/crowdsourcing-brings-historical-archive-online/
190.
Holley, Rose. Crowdsourcing: How and why should libraries do it? D-Lib Magazine. 2010;16(3/4). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march10/holley/03holley.print.html
191.
Holley, Rose. Crowdsourcing strategies for archives. Published online 2010. http://www.slideshare.net/RHmarvellous/naa-archives-20-week-roseholleycrowdsourcingnov-2010
192.
Europeana: Think Culture. Europeana: Think Culture: Strategic Plan 2011-2015.; 2012. http://web.archive.org/web/20120207083048/http://pro.europeana.eu/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=c4f19464-7504-44db-ac1e-3ddb78c922d7&groupId=10602
193.
Europeana: Think Culture. Explore Europe’s cultural collections. http://www.europeana.eu/portal/
194.
Alexander, Martha Latika, Gautam, J.N. Interoperability and Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting ( OAI-PMH ).; 2004:11-13. http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/1944/352/1/04cali_44.pdf
195.
Archives Task Force. Listening to the Past, Speaking to the Future: Report of the Archives Task Force.; 2004. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20111013135435/http://research.mla.gov.uk/evidence/documents/atf_report_pdf_5479.pdf
196.
Chan, L, Zeng, M. Metadata interoperability and standardization: a study of methodology part 1: Achieving interoperability at schema level. D-Lib Magazine. 2006;12(6). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june06/chan/06chan.html
197.
Zeng, M, Chan, L. Metadata interoperability and standardization - A study of methodology part II: Achieving interoperability at the record and repository levels. D-Lib Magazine. 2006;12(6). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june06/zeng/06zeng.html
198.
Day, Michael. Metadata mapping between metadata formats. Published online 2002. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/interoperability/
199.
Stevenson, Jane,, Ruddock, Bethan. Moving towards interoperability: Experiences of the Archives Hub. Ariadne. 2010;63. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue63/stevenson-ruddock
200.
Craig, Barbara L. Perimeters with fences? Or thresholds with doors? Two views of a border. American Archivist. 2003;66. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40294219
201.
Hill, Amanda. Serving the invisible researcher: meeting the needs of online users. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2004;25. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0037981042000271466
202.
Holley, Rose. Stories to tell: The making of our digital nation. Published online 2010. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a19icvJO_HE
203.
Online Archive of California. The Online Archive of California (OAC) Project: A prototype union database of encoded archival finding aids, 1998. Published online 1998. http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/FindingAids/uc-ead/
204.
Mildren, Rob. The Scottish Archive Network Project Evaluation Report.; 2004. http://www.scan.org.uk/aboutus/report.pdf
205.
UK Archives Discovery Network. UKAD: Promoting archives discovery for the benefit of researchers. https://web.archive.org/web/20160322095757/http://www.ukad.org/
206.
Yeo, Geoffrey. Understanding users and use: A market segmentation approach. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2005;26. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00039810500047425
207.
George Washington University. University writing class remembers holocaust victims. Published online 2010. http://gwtoday.gwu.edu/university-writing-class-remembers-holocaust-victims
208.
ArchivalSoftware. http://archivalsoftware.pbworks.com/w/page/13600254/FrontPage
209.
Spiro L. Archival Management Software: a Report for the Council on Library and Information Resources. Published online 2009. https://www.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/spiro_Jan13.pdf
210.
Council of Nova Scotia Archives’. Archives Management Software Review. Published online 2009. http://www.councilofnsarchives.ca/sites/default/files/CNSA%20Software%20Review%202008-Final.pdf
211.
CDL Digital Special Collections. Collection Management and Creation Strategies for UC Special Collections and Archives. Published online 2009. http://www.cdlib.org/services/access_publishing/dsc/tools/docs/cdams_summary_report.pdf
212.
Shapley M. The ANU Archives implementation of ica-atom software. Published online 2014. https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/12285/1/Shapley%20The%20ANU%20Archives%20implementation%20of%20ica-atom%20software%202014.pdf
213.
National Information Standards Organization (NISO). A framework of guidance for building good digital collections, 3rd edition. 2007;(December):4-25. https://www.niso.org/sites/default/files/2017-08/framework3.pdf
214.
Stobo, Victoria. Copyright and risk: Scoping the Wellcome Digital Library Project. Published online 2013. http://www.create.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/CREATe-Working-Paper-No.10.pdf
215.
Padfield T, Post JB, Great Britain. Public Record Office. Copyright for Archivists and Users of Archives. Public Record Office; 2001.
216.
National Library of New Zealand. Creating a digital New Zealand: New Zealand’s digital content strategy. Published 2007. http://www.itu.int/wsis/stocktaking/docs/activities/1211236218/DigitalContentStrategy.pdf
217.
Smith L, Rowley J. Digitisation of local heritage: Local studies collections and digitisation in public libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2012;44(4):272-280. doi:10.1177/0961000611434760
218.
Wajon, Scott. Digitisation workflow. Published online 2012. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8MIiMunVVg
219.
Hughes L, Green D. Digitizing Collections: Strategic Issues for the Information Manager. Vol Digital futures. Facet; 2002.
220.
Dunning A. Digitizing the past: next steps for public sector digitization. In: Digital Information: Order or Anarchy?. Facet Publishing; 2009:117-132.
221.
New South Wales Government State Records. Equipment for digitisation. http://web.archive.org/web/20221116152919/https://www.records.nsw.gov.au/recordkeeping/equipment-digitisation
222.
Pancza, János. Hungarian National Digital Archive and Hungarian participation in Europeana. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/jnos-pancza-italy-nm/8624247
223.
Barry L, Tedd LA. Local studies collections online: an investigation in Irish public libraries. Program. 2008;42(2). http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/00330330810867710
224.
Daniel I. New digitisation workflow proposal. Published online 2009. http://dev.llgc.org.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/New_WF_proposal_v1.1.pdf
225.
Bülow A, Ahmon J, Spencer R, National Archives (Great Britain). Preparing Collections for Digitization. Facet, in association with the National Archives; 2011. http://www.vlebooks.com/Vleweb/Product/Index/183183?page=0
226.
Riley, Jenn. Seeing standards: A visualization of the metadata universe. Published online 2010. http://jennriley.com/metadatamap/
227.
Stratton, Barbara. Seeking New Landscapes: A Rights Clearance Study in the Context of Mass Digitisation of 140 Books Published between 1870 and 2010.; 2010. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjV5KTo9-zdAhUELMAKHUR6ArcQFjAAegQICRAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fvana.nlib.ee%2Fpublic%2Fdocuments%2Fraamatukogule%2Forbteoste_uurimus2011.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3Y9UPenFHjCeDYMakgU1DI
228.
Vogt-O’Connor D. Selection of materials for scanning. In: Sitts MK, ed. Handbook for Digital Projects: A Management Tool for Preservation and Access. ; 2000. http://www.nedcc.org/assets/media/documents/dman.pdf
229.
University of Nottingham. The Wollaton Library Collection episode 3: Digitisation. Published online 2012. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LznscHQXH0
230.
Padfield T. What is copyright? In: Copyright for Archivists and Records Managers. Sixth edition. Facet Publishing; 2019. https://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=4606163920002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
231.
Edina Data Centre. What is metadata? Published online 2011. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96ncNPpohjo
232.
Hughes L. Why digitize? The costs and benefits of digitization. In: Digitizing Collections: Strategic Issues for the Information Manager. Vol Digital futures. Facet; 2002:4-30.
233.
McGovern NY. A Digital Decade: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going in Digital Preservation? RLG DigiNews. 2007;11(1). http://worldcat.org/arcviewer/1/OCC/2007/08/08/0000070511/viewer/file1981.html#article3
234.
The Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories. Published online 2011. http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/652x0m1.pdf
235.
Halbert M. Comparison of Strategies and Policies for Building Distributed Digital Preservation Infrastructure: Initial Findings from the MetaArchive Cooperative. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2009;4(2):43-59. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v4i2.92
236.
Digital Curation Centre. Curation Reference Manual | Digital Curation Centre. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/curation-reference-manual
237.
Brown A. Developing Practical Approaches to Active Preservation. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2007;2(1):3-11. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v2i1.10
238.
Harvey DR. Digital Curation: A How-to-Do-It Manual. Facet; 2010.
239.
Rusbridge C. Excuse Me... Some Digital Preservation Fallacies? Ariadne. 2006;(46). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue46/rusbridge/
240.
Brown A. Practical Digital Preservation: A How-to Guide for Organizations of Any Size. Facet Publishing; 2013. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9781856049627
241.
PREMIS Editorial Committee. PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata, Version 3.0. Published online 2015. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf
242.
Consultative Committee for Space Data System Practices. Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS). 2012;(June). https://public.ccsds.org/pubs/650x0m2.pdf
243.
Blue Ribbon Task Force. Sustainable Economies for a Digital Planet: Ensuring Long-Term Access to Digital Information. Published online 2010. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19116/1/19116.pdf
244.
Lavoie, Brian F. Technology watch report: The Open Archival Information System Reference Model: Introductory guide, 2nd Edition. Published online 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.7207/twr14-02
245.
Higgins S. The DCC curation lifecycle model. The International Journal of Digital Curation. 2008;3(1):134-140. http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/69
246.
Currall J, Johnson C, McKinney P. The world is all grown digital.... How shall a man persuade management what to do in such times? International Journal of Digital Curation. 2007;2(1):12-28. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v2i1.11
247.
Paradigm Project. Workbook on digital private papers. Published online 2008. http://www.paradigm.ac.uk/workbook/index.html
