1.
Theimer, K. ed: Appraisal and acquisition: innovative practices for archives and special collections. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland (2015).
2.
Roe, K.: Arranging & describing archives & manuscripts. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2005).
3.
Theimer, K. ed: Description. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2014).
4.
International Council on Archives: International Council on Archives code of ethics. (1996).
5.
International Council on Archives: ISAD(G): General international standard archival description. (2000).
6.
Williams, C.: Managing archives: foundations, principles and practice. Chandos, Oxford (2006).
7.
Robyns, M.C.: Using functional analysis in archival appraisal: a practical and effective alternative to traditional appraisal methodologies. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2014).
8.
Jenkinson, H.: A manual of archive administration. Lund, Humphries, London (1965).
9.
Arts Council England: Acceptance in Lieu, https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/tax-incentives/acceptance-lieu.
10.
The National Archives: Applying for Grant Aid, http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/applying_grant_aid.pdf, (2004).
11.
The National Archives: Archive Collection Policy Statements: Checklist of Suggested Contents, https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/+/https:/www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/archive-collection-policy.pdf, (2004).
12.
Abraham, T.: Collection policy or documentation strategy: theory and practice. American Archivist. 54, (1991).
13.
Kitching, C., Hart, I.: Collection policy statements. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 16, 7–14 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379819509511756.
14.
Cultural Gifts Scheme and Acceptance in Lieu - report 2021, https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/CGSAILAnnualReport2021%20%281%29.pdf, (2021).
15.
Abraham, T.: Documentary Strategies: A Decade (or More) Later, http://webpages.uidaho.edu/special-collections/papers/docstr10.htm.
16.
Department for Digital, Culture Media & Sport: Export of Objects of Cultural Interest 2018-19 and 2019-20, https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/RCEWA_annual_report%20%2718%2619_%2719%2620.pdf, (2021).
17.
Arts Council England: Export licensing, http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/what-we-do/supporting-museums/cultural-property/export-controls/export-licensing/.
18.
Goodison, N.: Goodison Review securing the best for our museums: Private giving and Government support, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20050301200356/http://hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/B9D/02/ACF10B6.pdf, (2004).
19.
The National Archives: Loan (deposit) agreements for privately owned archives, https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/+/https:/www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/loanagreement.pdf, (2006).
20.
Tullock, J., Alexandra, C.: Logjam: an audit of uncatalogued collections in the North West, http://web.archive.org/web/20060926174216/http://www.mlanorthwest.org.uk/assets/documents/10000070Logjamfullreport.pdf, (2004).
21.
Sims, R.M.C.: Obligations and aftercare: the depositor and service standard agreements. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 24, 215–221 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981032000127061.
22.
Arts Council England: Reviewing committee, https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/supporting-collections-and-cultural-property/reviewing-committee.
23.
The National Archives: Surveying historical manuscripts: some guidelines, http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/archives/surveying-historical-manuscripts.pdf, (2006).
24.
HM Government: Tax relief for national heritage assets - Detailed guidance, https://www.gov.uk/tax-relief-for-national-heritage-assets.
25.
Hackman, L.J., Warnow-Blewett, J.: The documentation strategy process: a model and a case study. American Archivist. 50, 12–47 (1987).
26.
Dicken, J.: Twentieth century literary archives: Collecting policies and research initiatives. In: New directions in archival research. Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies, Liverpool (2000).
27.
Helen Willa Samuels: Who controls the past. American Archivist. 49, (1986).
28.
Tschan, R.A.: A comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on appraisal. American Archivist. 65, (2002).
29.
Larkin, P.: A neglected responsibility: contemporary literary manuscripts. In: Required writing: miscellaneous pieces 1955-1982. Faber, London (1983).
30.
The National Archives: Acquisition and disposition strategy. (2007).
31.
Cook, Terry: Appraisal methodology: Macro appraisal and functional analysis. Part A: Concept and theory, http://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/services/government-information-resources/disposition/Documents/MacroappraisalPartA.pdf, (2000).
32.
Menne-Haritz, A.: Appraisal or documentation: Can we appraise archives by selecting content? American Archivist. 57, (1994).
33.
The National Archives: Appraisal policy. (2012).
34.
The National Archives: Appraisal toolkits, http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/projects-and-work/appraisal.htm.
35.
Baerlett, N: Appraising university records: A retrospective analysis, http://www-personal.umich.edu/~deromedi/module/nbdisc.htm, (2001).
36.
Reed, B.: Archival appraisal. In: Keeping archives. Thorpe in association with the Australian Society of Archivists, Port Melbourne (1993).
37.
Boles, F., Young, J.M.: Archival appraisal. Neal-Schuman Publishers, New York (1991).
38.
Couture, C.: Archival appraisal, a status report. Archivaria. 59, (1995).
39.
Craig, B.L., Thomson Gale (Firm): Archival appraisal: theory and practice. K.G. Saur, München, Germany (2004).
40.
Ham, F.G.: Archival choices: Managing the historical record in an age of abundance. American Archivist. 47, (1984).
41.
Brichford, M.J., Society of American Archivists: Archives and manuscripts: appraisal and accessioning. Society of Archivists, Chicago (1977).
42.
Jimerson, R.: Archives and manuscripts: deciding what to save. OCLC Systems & Services. 19, (2003).
43.
Walters, T.O.: Contemporary archival appraisal methods and preservation decision-making. American Archivist. 59, (1996).
44.
Pearce, N.: Deciding what to save: Fifty years of theory and practice. In: Archival choices: managing the historical record in an age of abundance. pp. 1–18. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass (1984).
45.
Harvey, Ross: Digital curation manual instalment on appraisal and selection. (2007).
46.
Abraham, Terry: Documentation strategies: A decade (or more) later. (1995).
47.
Greene, M.A., Daniels-Howell, T.J.: Documentation with an attitude: A pragmatist’s guide to the selection and acquisition to modern business records. In: The records of American business. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (1997).
48.
Jimerson, R.: Embracing the power of archives. The American Archivist. 69, (2006).
49.
Boles, F., Greene, M.A.: Et tu Schellenberg? Thoughts on the dagger of American appraisal theory. American Archivist. 59, (1996).
50.
Doylen, Michael: Experiments in deaccessioning: Archives and online auctions. American Archivist. 64, (2001).
51.
Boles, F.: Exploring the black box: The appraisal of university administrative records. American Archivist. 48, (1985).
52.
Bailey, C: From top down: The practice of macro-appraisal. Archivaria. 43, (1997).
53.
Whyte, Angus, Wilson, Andrew: How to appraise and select research data for curation. (2010).
54.
Benedict, K.: Invitation to a bonfire: Reappraisal and de-accessioning of records as collection management tools in an Archives – A reply to Leonard Rapport. American Archivist. 47, (1984).
55.
Stapleton, R.: Jenkinson and Schellenberg: a comparison. Archivaria. 17, (1983).
56.
Cook, Terry: Macro-appraisal and functional analysis: documenting governance rather than government. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 25, (2004).
57.
Brown, R.: Macro-appraisal theory and the context of the public records creator. Archivaria. 40, (1995).
58.
Cook, Terry: Macroappraisal in theory and practice: Origins, characteristics and implementation in Canada, 1950-2000. Archival Science. 4, (2005).
59.
Boles, F.: Mix two parts interest to one part information and appraise until done: Understanding contemporary record selection processes. American Archivist. 50, (1987).
60.
Schellenberg, T.R.: Modern archives: principles and techniques. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2003).
61.
Jenkinson, H.: Modern archives. Some reflections on T R Schellenberg. (1980).
62.
Cox, R.J.: No innocent deposits: forming archives by rethinking appraisal. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Md (2004).
63.
The National Archives: Operational selection policies, http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/projects-and-work/osp-number.htm.
64.
Ide, M., Weisse, L.: Recommended appraisal guidelines for selecting born digital master programs for preservation and deposit with the Library of Congress. (2006).
65.
Eastwood, T.: Reflections on the goal of archival appraisal in democratic societies. Archivaria. 54, (2002).
66.
Booms, Hans: Society and the formation of a documentary heritage: Issues in the appraisal of archival sources. Archivaria. 24, (1987).
67.
Williams, Caroline: Studying reality: the application of theory in an aspect of UK practice. Archivaria. 62, (2006).
68.
Jenkinson, H.: The choice of records for preservation in wartime: some practical hints. In: Selected writings of Sir Hilary Jenkinson (1980).
69.
Mercer, H.: The National Archives appraisal policy: Background paper – the Grigg system and beyond. (2004).
70.
Schellenberg, T.R.: The appraisal of modern public records. National Archives bulletin 8. (1956).
71.
Duranti, Luciana: The concept of appraisal and archival theory. American Archivist. 57, (1994).
72.
Hackman, L.J.: The documentation strategy process: A model and a case study. American Archivist. 50, (1987).
73.
Cox, R.J.: The end of collecting: Towards a new purpose for archival appraisal. Archival Science. 2, (2002).
74.
Bearman, D., Lytle, R.: The power and principle of provenance. Archivaria. 21, (1985).
75.
Day, M.: The selection, appraisal and retention of digital scientific data: the ERPANET / CODATA workshop. Ariadne. (2004).
76.
Hull, F.: The use of sampling techniques in the retention of records: A RAMP study with guidelines. (1981).
77.
Foote, K.E.: To remember and forget: Archives, memory, and culture. American Archivist. 53, (1990).
78.
Cook, T.: We are what we keep: We keep what we are: Archival appraisal past, present and future. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 32, (2011).
79.
Cook, T.: What is past is prologue: A history of archival ideas since 1898 and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria. 43, (1997).
80.
Samuels, H.W.: Who controls the past. American Archivist. 49, (1986).
81.
Momryk, Myron: "National significance ”: The evolution and development of acquisition strategies in the manuscript division , National Archives of Canada. Archivaria: the Journal of the Association of Canadian Archivists. 52, (2001).
82.
Yakel, Elizabeth: Archival representation. Archival Science. 3, (2003).
83.
Cook, T.: Archival science and postmodernism: New formulations for old concepts. Archival Science. 1, (2000).
84.
Nesmith, T., Society of American Archivists, Association of Canadian Archivists: Archival studies in English-speaking Canada and the North American rediscovery of provenance. In: Canadian archival studies and the rediscovery of provenance. Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, N.J. (1993).
85.
Scott, Peter J, Finlay, G.: Archives and Administrative Change: Some Methods and Approaches (Part I). Archives and Manuscripts. 7, (1978).
86.
Cook, Terry, Schwartz, Joan M: Archives, records and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Archival Science. 2, (2002).
87.
Miller, F.M.: Arranging and describing archives and manuscripts. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (1990).
88.
Goldman, R.: Derangement and Description: A chaotic little archives webcomic, https://derangementanddescription.wordpress.com/.
89.
Boles, F.: Disrespecting original order. American Archivist. 45, (1982).
90.
Cook, Terry: Fashionable nonsense or professional rebirth: Postmodernism and the practice of archives. Archivaria. 51, (2001).
91.
Clanchy, M.T.: From memory to written record: England 1066-1307. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2013).
92.
Meehan, J.: Making the Leap from Parts to Whole: Evidence and Inference in Archival Arrangement and Description. American Archivist. 72, (2009).
93.
Muller, S., Feith, J.A., Fruin, R.: Manual for the arrangement and description of archives. Wilson, New York (1968).
94.
Schellenberg, T.R.: Modern archives: principles and techniques. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2003).
95.
Anchor, R.: ‘More product less process’: method, madness or practice? Archives & Records. 34, (2013).
96.
Brothman, Brien: Orders of value: Probing the theoretical terms of archival practice. Archivaria. 32, (1991).
97.
Macneil, Heather: Picking our text: Archival description, authenticity, and the archivist as editor. American Archivist. 68, (2005).
98.
Dwiggins, D.M.: Putting the ‘Where’ in the Archives: Internet Mapping and Archival Records, http://web.archive.org/web/20130411082237/http://www.librarystudentjournal.org/index.php/lsj/article/view/112/275.
99.
Parker, Elizabeth: Records life cycle structure study, https://web.archive.org/web/20110126043435/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/generalpublications/2002/recordssrlstructure.aspx#B, (2002).
100.
Wells, E.: Related Material – The Arrangement and Description of Family Papers. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 33, 167–184 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2012.722528.
101.
Duff, W., Harris, V.: Stories and names: Archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Archival Science. 2, (2002).
102.
Cook, T.: The concept of the archival fonds in the post-custodial era: Theory, problems and solutions. Archivaria. 35, (1993).
103.
Millar, Laura: The death of the fonds and the resurrection of provenance: Archival context in space and time. Archivaria. 53, (2002).
104.
Horsman, Peter: The last dance of the phoenix, or the re-discovery of the archival fonds. Archivaria. 54, (2002).
105.
Hurley, C.: The making and keeping of records: (1) What are finding aids for. Archives and Manuscripts. 26, (1998).
106.
Duranti, L.: Origin and development of the concept of description. Archivaria. 35, (1993).
107.
Bearman, D., Lytle, R.: The power and principle of provenance. Archivaria. 21, (1985).
108.
Scott, P.J.: The record group concept: A case for abandonment. American Archivist. 29, (1966).
109.
International Dunhuang Project: The Silk Road online, http://idp.bl.uk/.
110.
Duchein, Michel: Theoretical principles and practical problems of respect des fonds in archival science. Archivaria. 16, (1983).
111.
Cook, Terry: What is past is prologue: A history of archival ideas since 1898 and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria. 43, (1997).
112.
Beattie, Heather: Where narratives meet: Archival description, provenance, and women’s diaries. Libraries and the Cultural Record. 44, (2009).
113.
Kaplan, Deborah, Sauer, Anne, Wilczek, Eliot: Archival description in OAI-ORE. Journal of Digital Information. 12, (2011).
114.
Yakel, Elizabeth: Archival representation. Archival Science. 3, (2003).
115.
Hensen, S.L.: Archives, personal papers, and manuscripts: a cataloging manual for archival repositories, historical societies, and manuscript libraries. [Manuscript Division, Library of Congress], Washington, D.C. (1983).
116.
Miller, F.M.: Arranging and describing archives and manuscripts. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (1990).
117.
O’Brien, Jeff: Basic RAD: A short introduction, https://www.scaa.sk.ca/fileadmin/scaa/storage/800-Education/804-Educational_Publications/Basic_rad.pdf, (1997).
118.
Weber, L.B.: Record Formatting: MARC AMC. In: Describing Archival Materials: The Use of the Marc AMC Format. Routledge (1990).
119.
Australian Society of Archivists. Committee on Descriptive Standards: Describing archives in context: a guide to Australian practice. Australian Society of Archivists, Committee on Descriptive Standards, [S.l.] (2005).
120.
Peters, V.: Developing archival context standards for functions in the higher education sector. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 26, (2005).
121.
Bunn, J.: Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23257962.2013.830066, (2013).
122.
EAD Working Group: Development of the encoded archival description DTD, http://www.loc.gov/ead/eaddev.html, (1998).
123.
van Ballegooie, M., Duff, W.: Digital Curation Manual: Instalment on archival metadata, http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/resource/curation-manual/chapters/archival-metadata/archival-metadata.pdf, (2006).
124.
Technical Subcommittee on Encoded Archival Description: EAD revision, https://www2.archivists.org/groups/technical-subcommittee-on-encoded-archival-description-ead-disbanded/ead-revision, (2013).
125.
Goss, S.: Facilitating access to archival material: The creation of EAD records for the online archive of California. PNLA Quarterly. 77, (2013).
126.
Gateway to Archives of Scottish Higher Education (GASHE): GASHE standard for creating activity descriptions, http://www.gashe.ac.uk/about/standard.html, (2006).
127.
Archives and Records Association: Guide to standards, http://www.archives.org.uk/si-dsg/guide-to-standards.html.
128.
Stevenson, A, Stevenson, J: Lifting the lid on linked data: Linked data and the LOCAH project, http://locah.archiveshub.ac.uk/tag/modelling/, (2011).
129.
Hooland, S. van, Verborgh, R.: Linked data for libraries, archives and museums: how to clean, link and publish your metadata. Facet Publishing, London (2014).
130.
Shepherd, Elizabeth, Pringle, R: Mapping descriptive standards across domains: A comparison of ISAD(G) and SPECTRUM. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 23, (2002).
131.
Procter, M., Cook, M.: Manual of archival description. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2016).
132.
Anarchivist: My Journey With Encoded Archival Description, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbRjil4yeDU, (14)AD.
133.
Yeo, Geoffrey: New approaches to archival description Standards for archival description " The need for descriptive standards is no longer a subject for debate ”, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/infostudies/geoffrey-yeo/description.pdf, (2008).
134.
Walch, V. I: Standards for archival description: A handbook, http://www.archivists.org/catalog/stds99/, (1994).
135.
The Society of American Archivists: Statement of principles for the CUSTARD Project, http://www.archivists.org/news/custardproject.asp.
136.
Ruch, A.: Supporting interoperability of distributed archives using authority controlled ontologies, https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwjrm42J8-zdAhWJK8AKHekwATgQFjAAegQICRAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alliancepermanentaccess.org%2Fpv%2Fpv2009%2FPV2009%2F43_Ruch_Interoperability_in_distributed_archives_with_Authority_controlled_Ontologies_Proceedings.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0GlBaBDDhoYV1f21p8TL0S.
137.
Shepherd, Elizabeth, Smith, C: The application of ISAD(G) to the description of archival datasets. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 21, (2000).
138.
Hurley, C.: The Australian (‘series’) system: An exposition. In: The Records Continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives First Fifty Years: Ian Maclean’s and Australian Archives First Fifty Years. National Archives of Australia, Parkes.
139.
Caswell, M.: Using classification to convict the Khmer Rouge. Journal of Documentation. 68, 162–184 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411211209177.
140.
Zhang, J., Mauney, D.: When archival description meets digital object metadata: A typological study of digital archival representation. The American Archivist. 76, (2013).
141.
Mortimer, I: ARCHON and the indexes to the National Register of Archives: Past, present and future. Program: Electronic Libraries and Information Systems. 33, (1999).
142.
N2T: Archival resource key (ARK) identifiers, http://n2t.net/e/ark_ids.html.
143.
Getty Research Institute: Art and architecture thesaurus online, http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/aat/index.html, (2000).
144.
W3C: Date and time formats, http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime, (1997).
145.
Local Government Association: Integrated public sector vocabulary, https://standards.esd.org.uk/?uri=list%2Fsubjects.
146.
International Council on Archives: ISAAR (CPF): International standard archival authority record for corporate bodies, persons and families, 2nd Edition, https://www.ica.org/en/isaar-cpf-international-standard-archival-authority-record-corporate-bodies-persons-and-families-2nd, (2011).
147.
Library of Congress: Library of congress authorities, http://authorities.loc.gov.
148.
National Council on Archives: National Council on Archives: Rules for the Construction of Personal, Place and Corporate Names, http://archiveshub.ac.uk/ncarules/.
149.
Davidson, J: Persistent identifiers, http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/briefing-papers/introduction-curation/persistent-identifiers, (2006).
150.
Cox, E, Czechowski, L: Subject access points in the MARC record and archival finding aid: Enough or too many? Journal of Archival Organization. 5, (2007).
151.
Ribeiro, F: Subject indexing and authority control in archives: The need for subject indexing in archives and for an indexing policy using controlled language. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 17, (1996).
152.
DOI: The DOI system: Factsheets, http://www.doi.org/factsheets.html, (2011).
153.
Vitali, S: The second edition of ISAAR(CPF) and authority control in systems for archival descriptive systems, http://www.sba.unifi.it/ac/relazioni/vitali_eng.pdf.
154.
University of London Computer Centre: UK archival thesaurus, http://www.ukat.org.uk/.
155.
UNESCO: UNESCO thesaurus, http://databases.unesco.org/thesaurus/.
156.
Garrod, P: Use of the UNESCO thesaurus for subject indexing at UK NDAD. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 21, (2000).
157.
Corporation for National Research Initiatives: Welcome to the handle system, http://www.handle.net.
158.
Higgins, Richard: A case study of EAD implementation at Durham University Library Archives and Special Collections. Archives and Museum Informatics. 12, (1998).
159.
Society of American Archivists: A different kind of web: new connections between archives and our users. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2011).
160.
Morris, L: Developing a cooperative intra-institutional approach to EAD implementation: The Harvard/Radcliffe digital findings aids project. American Archivist. 60, (1997).
161.
EAD Working Group: Development of the encoded archival description DTD, http://www.loc.gov/ead/eaddev.html, (1998).
162.
Hill, Amanda, Stockting, William, Higgins, Sarah: Different strokes for different folks: Presenting EAD in three UK online catalogues. Journal of Archival Organization. 183–195 (2006).
163.
Kiesling, K: EAD as an archival descriptive standard. American Archivist. 60, (1997).
164.
Encoded Archival Context Working Group: Encoded archival context: Corporate bodies, persons and families, http://eac.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/, (2011).
165.
Pitti, Daniel: Encoded Archival Description. An introduction and overview. D-Lib Magazine. 5, (1999).
166.
Stockting, William, Queyroux, F: Encoding across frontiers. Journal of Archival Organization 3 (2/3) (2004).
167.
EAD Working Group: Encoded archival description tag library version 2002 - EAD technical document No. 2, http://www.loc.gov/ead/tglib/index.html, (2002).
168.
Johnston, D: From typescript finding aids to EAD (Encoded Archival Description). A university case study. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 22, (2001).
169.
Committee of Inquiry into the Changing Learner Experience: Higher education in a Web 2.0 world. (2009).
170.
Bouché, Nicole: Implementing EAD in the Yale University Library. American Archivist. 60, (1997).
171.
Higgins, S., Inglis, G.: Implementing EAD: the experience of the NAHSTE project. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 24, 199–214 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981032000127052.
172.
Fox, M: Implementing encoded archival description: An overview of administrative and technical considerations. American Archivist. 60, (1997).
173.
King, K: Introduction to Web 2.0 for archives, http://www.slideshare.net/araik/web-20-and-archives.
174.
EAD Practices Working Group: Library of Congress Encoded Archival Description best practices. (2008).
175.
Miller, D.R., Clarke, K.S., ebrary, Inc: Putting XML to work in the library: tools for improving access and management. American Library Association, Chicago (2004).
176.
RLG EAD Advisory Group: RLG best practice guidelines for encoded archival description. (2002).
177.
Hajo, C: Scholarly editing in a Web 2.0 world, https://wp.nyu.edu/archivesandpublichistory/people-2/cathy-moran-hajo/scholarly-editing-in-a-web-2-0-world/, (2009).
178.
Prom, Chris: The EAD cookbook. A survey and usability study. American Archivist. 65, (2002).
179.
Stevenson, J: The impact of Web 2.0 on archives, http://www.slideshare.net/JaneStevenson/the-impact-of-web-20-on-archives, (2010).
180.
Daines, J.G., Nimer, C.L.: The Interactive Archivist, http://interactivearchivist.archivists.org/.
181.
Sweet, Meg: The internationalisation of EAD (Encoded Archival Description). Journal of the Society of Archivists. 22, (2001).
182.
Theimer, K.M.: Web 2.0 tools and strategies for archives and local history collections. Facet, London (2010).
183.
Stockdale, R.: The retrospective conversion of the British Library manuscripts catalogues: A description of the project. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 21, (2000).
184.
Tennant, R.: XML in libraries. Neal-Schuman Publishers, New York (2002).
185.
Godby, C.J., Young, J.A., Childress, E.: A Repository of Metadata Crosswalks, http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december04/godby/12godby.html, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1045/december2004-godby.
186.
Archives and Records Council Wales: Archives Network Wales project evaluation: Results of a user survey , July-August 2005. (2005).
187.
Kingsley, Nick: Archives Task Force Discussion paper 3: The Electronic "National Archives Network”. (2003).
188.
Hill, Amanda: Bringing archives online with the Archives Hub. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 23, (2002).
189.
Home, Rebecca: Crowdsourcing brings historical archive online, http://blogs.wsj.com/photojournal/2011/10/20/crowdsourcing-brings-historical-archive-online/, (2011).
190.
Holley, Rose: Crowdsourcing: How and why should libraries do it? D-Lib Magazine. 16, (2010).
191.
Holley, Rose: Crowdsourcing strategies for archives, http://www.slideshare.net/RHmarvellous/naa-archives-20-week-roseholleycrowdsourcingnov-2010, (2010).
192.
Europeana: Think Culture: Europeana: Think culture: Strategic plan 2011-2015. (2012).
193.
Europeana: Think Culture: Explore Europe’s cultural collections, http://www.europeana.eu/portal/.
194.
Alexander, Martha Latika, Gautam, J.N: Interoperability and open archives initiative protocol for metadata harvesting ( OAI-PMH ). (2004).
195.
Archives Task Force: Listening to the past, Speaking to the future: Report of the Archives Task Force. (2004).
196.
Chan, L, Zeng, M: Metadata interoperability and standardization: a study of methodology part 1: Achieving interoperability at schema level. D-Lib Magazine. 12, (2006).
197.
Zeng, M, Chan, L: Metadata interoperability and standardization - A study of methodology part II: Achieving interoperability at the record and repository levels. D-Lib Magazine. 12, (2006).
198.
Day, Michael: Metadata mapping between metadata formats, http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/interoperability/, (2002).
199.
Stevenson, Jane,, Ruddock, Bethan: Moving towards interoperability: Experiences of the Archives Hub. Ariadne. 63, (2010).
200.
Craig, Barbara L.: Perimeters with fences? Or thresholds with doors? Two views of a border. American Archivist. 66, (2003).
201.
Hill, Amanda: Serving the invisible researcher: meeting the needs of online users. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 25, (2004).
202.
Holley, Rose: Stories to tell: The making of our digital nation, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a19icvJO_HE, (2010).
203.
Online Archive of California: The Online Archive of California (OAC) Project: A prototype union database of encoded archival finding aids, 1998, http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/FindingAids/uc-ead/, (1998).
204.
Mildren, Rob: The Scottish Archive Network Project evaluation report. (2004).
205.
UK Archives Discovery Network: UKAD: Promoting archives discovery for the benefit of researchers, https://web.archive.org/web/20160322095757/http://www.ukad.org/.
206.
Yeo, Geoffrey: Understanding users and use: A market segmentation approach. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 26, (2005).
207.
George Washington University: University writing class remembers holocaust victims, http://gwtoday.gwu.edu/university-writing-class-remembers-holocaust-victims, (2010).
208.
ArchivalSoftware, http://archivalsoftware.pbworks.com/w/page/13600254/FrontPage.
209.
Spiro, L.: Archival Management Software: a Report for the Council on Library and Information Resources, https://www.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/spiro_Jan13.pdf, (2009).
210.
Council of Nova Scotia Archives’: Archives Management Software Review, http://www.councilofnsarchives.ca/sites/default/files/CNSA%20Software%20Review%202008-Final.pdf, (2009).
211.
CDL Digital Special Collections: Collection Management and Creation Strategies for UC Special Collections and Archives, http://www.cdlib.org/services/access_publishing/dsc/tools/docs/cdams_summary_report.pdf, (2009).
212.
Shapley, M.: The ANU Archives implementation of ica-atom software, https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/12285/1/Shapley%20The%20ANU%20Archives%20implementation%20of%20ica-atom%20software%202014.pdf, (2014).
213.
National Information Standards Organization (NISO): A framework of guidance for building good digital collections, 3rd edition, https://www.niso.org/sites/default/files/2017-08/framework3.pdf, (2007).
214.
Stobo, Victoria: Copyright and risk: Scoping the Wellcome Digital Library Project, http://www.create.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/CREATe-Working-Paper-No.10.pdf, (2013).
215.
Padfield, T., Post, J.B., Great Britain. Public Record Office: Copyright for archivists and users of archives. Public Record Office, Richmond, Surrey (2001).
216.
National Library of New Zealand: Creating a digital New Zealand: New Zealand’s digital content strategy, http://www.itu.int/wsis/stocktaking/docs/activities/1211236218/DigitalContentStrategy.pdf.
217.
Smith, L., Rowley, J.: Digitisation of local heritage: Local studies collections and digitisation in public libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 44, 272–280 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000611434760.
218.
Wajon, Scott: Digitisation workflow, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8MIiMunVVg, (2012).
219.
Hughes, L., Green, D.: Digitizing collections: strategic issues for the information manager. Facet, London (2002).
220.
Dunning, A.: Digitizing the past: next steps for public sector digitization. In: Digital Information: Order or Anarchy? pp. 117–132. Facet Publishing (2009).
221.
New South Wales Government State Records: Equipment for digitisation, http://web.archive.org/web/20221116152919/https://www.records.nsw.gov.au/recordkeeping/equipment-digitisation.
222.
Pancza, János: Hungarian National Digital Archive and Hungarian participation in Europeana, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/jnos-pancza-italy-nm/8624247.
223.
Barry, L., Tedd, L.A.: Local studies collections online: an investigation in Irish public libraries. Program. 42, (2008).
224.
Daniel, I.: New digitisation workflow proposal, http://dev.llgc.org.uk/wiki/images/b/b8/New_WF_proposal_v1.1.pdf, (2009).
225.
Bülow, A., Ahmon, J., Spencer, R., National Archives (Great Britain): Preparing collections for digitization. Facet, in association with the National Archives, London (2011).
226.
Riley, Jenn: Seeing standards: A visualization of the metadata universe, http://jennriley.com/metadatamap/, (2010).
227.
Stratton, Barbara: Seeking new landscapes: A rights clearance study in the context of mass digitisation of 140 books published between 1870 and 2010. (2010).
228.
Vogt-O’Connor, D.: Selection of materials for scanning. In: Sitts, M.K. (ed.) Handbook for digital projects: a management tool for preservation and access (2000).
229.
University of Nottingham: The Wollaton Library Collection episode 3: Digitisation, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LznscHQXH0, (2012).
230.
Padfield, T.: What is copyright? In: Copyright for archivists and records managers. Facet Publishing, London (2019).
231.
Edina Data Centre: What is metadata?, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96ncNPpohjo, (2011).
232.
Hughes, L.: Why digitize? The costs and benefits of digitization. In: Digitizing collections: strategic issues for the information manager. pp. 4–30. Facet, London (2002).
233.
McGovern, N.Y.: A Digital Decade: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going in Digital Preservation? RLG DigiNews. 11, (2007).
234.
The Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems: Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories, http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/652x0m1.pdf, (2011).
235.
Halbert, M.: Comparison of Strategies and Policies for Building Distributed Digital Preservation Infrastructure: Initial Findings from the MetaArchive Cooperative. International Journal of Digital Curation. 4, 43–59 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v4i2.92.
236.
Digital Curation Centre: Curation Reference Manual | Digital Curation Centre, http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/curation-reference-manual.
237.
Brown, A.: Developing Practical Approaches to Active Preservation. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2, 3–11 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v2i1.10.
238.
Harvey, D.R.: Digital curation: a how-to-do-it manual. Facet, London (2010).
239.
Rusbridge, C.: Excuse Me... Some Digital Preservation Fallacies? Ariadne. (2006).
240.
Brown, A.: Practical digital preservation: a how-to guide for organizations of any size. Facet Publishing, London (2013).
241.
PREMIS Editorial Committee: PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata, Version 3.0, http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf, (2015).
242.
Consultative Committee for Space Data System Practices: Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS), https://public.ccsds.org/pubs/650x0m2.pdf, (2012).
243.
Blue Ribbon Task Force: Sustainable Economies for a Digital Planet: Ensuring Long-Term Access to Digital Information, https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19116/1/19116.pdf, (2010).
244.
Lavoie, Brian F: Technology watch report: The Open Archival Information System Reference Model: Introductory guide, 2nd Edition, http://dx.doi.org/10.7207/twr14-02, (2014).
245.
Higgins, S.: The DCC curation lifecycle model. The International Journal of Digital Curation. 3, 134–140 (2008).
246.
Currall, J., Johnson, C., McKinney, P.: The world is all grown digital.... How shall a man persuade management what to do in such times? International Journal of Digital Curation. 2, 12–28 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v2i1.11.
247.
Paradigm Project: Workbook on digital private papers, http://www.paradigm.ac.uk/workbook/index.html, (2008).
