1.
Agbabi P, Chaucer G. Telling Tales. Canongate; 2015.
2.
Chaucer G, Benson LD. The Riverside Chaucer. 3rd ed. [with a new foreword by Christopher Cannon]. Oxford University Press; 2008.
3.
Greenlaw L. A Double Sorrow: Troilus and Criseyde. Faber & Faber; 2015. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780571284566
4.
Ali S. Refugee Tales. Comma Press; 2016. https://www.vlebooks.com/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&accId=8661456&isbn=9781910974636
5.
Holsinger BW. A Burnable Book. Harper; 2014.
6.
Trigg S. Medievalism and Theories of Temporality. In: Darcens L, ed. Cambridge Companion to Medievalism. Cambridge University Press; 2016:196-209.
7.
Justice S. Insurgency Remembered. In: Writing and Rebellion: England in 1381. University of California Press; 1994:193-254.
8.
Patterson L. ‘What man artow?’: authorial self-definition in The Tale of Sir Thopas and The Tale of Melibee. In: Temporal Circumstances: Form and History in the Canterbury Tales. Palgrave; 2006:97-128.
9.
Paul Strohm. Chaucer’s Troilus as Temporal Archive. In: Theory and the Premodern Text. University of Minnesota Press; 2000:80-96. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ABER/reader.action?docID=310523&ppg=66
10.
Barrington, Candace; Hsy, Jonathan. Remediated verse: Chaucer’s Tale of Melibee and Patience Agbabi’s ‘Unfinished Business’. Postmedieval. 2015;6(2):136-145. https://literature.proquest.com/searchFulltext.do?id=R05521248&divLevel=0&area=abell&forward=critref_ft
11.
Turner M, ed. A Handbook of Middle English Studies. Vol Wiley-Blackwell critical theory handbooks. Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=2422473300002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
12.
Butterfield A. Familiar Enemy: Chaucer, Language, and Nation in the Hundred Years War. Oxford University Press; 2009. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=2460386370002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
13.
Cooper H. The Canterbury Tales. Vol Oxford guides to Chaucer. Clarendon; 1989.
14.
D’Arcens L, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Medievalism. Vol Cambridge companions to culture. Cambridge University Press; 2016.
15.
Goldie MB. Middle English Literature: An Historical Sourcebook. Blackwell; 2003.
16.
Lerer S. The Yale Companion to Chaucer. Yale University Press; 2008.
17.
Matthews D. Medievalism: A Critical History. D.S. Brewer; 2017.
18.
Miller RP. Chaucer: Sources and Backgrounds. Oxford University Press; 1977.
19.
Minnis AJ. Medieval Theory of Authorship: Scholastic Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages. 2nd ed. Wildwood House; 1988.
20.
Emery E, Utz RJ, eds. Medievalism: Key Critical Terms. Vol Medievalism. D.S. Brewer; 2017.
21.
Pugh T, Weisl AJ. Medievalisms: Making the Past in the Present. Routledge; 2013.
22.
Scala E. Desire in the Canterbury Tales. Vol Interventions: New Studies Medieval Cult. Ohio State University Press; 2016.
23.
Turner M. Chaucerian Conflict: Languages of Antagonism in Late Fourteenth-Century London. Clarendon; 2007. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3586452850002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
24.
Windeatt BA. Oxford Guides to Chaucer: Troilus and Criseyde. Vol Oxford guides to Chaucer. Clarendon Press; 1992.