Agbabi, P., & Chaucer, G. (2015). Telling tales. Canongate.
Ali, S. (2016). Refugee Tales. Comma Press. https://www.vlebooks.com/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&accId=8661456&isbn=9781910974636
Barrington, Candace; Hsy, Jonathan. (2015). Remediated verse: Chaucer’s Tale of Melibee and Patience Agbabi’s ‘Unfinished Business’. Postmedieval, 6(2), 136–145. https://literature.proquest.com/searchFulltext.do?id=R05521248&divLevel=0&area=abell&forward=critref_ft
Butterfield, A. (2009). Familiar Enemy: Chaucer, Language, and Nation in the Hundred Years War. Oxford University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=2460386370002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
Chaucer, G., & Benson, L. D. (2008). The riverside Chaucer (3rd ed. [with a new foreword by Christopher Cannon]). Oxford University Press.
Cooper, H. (1989). The Canterbury tales: Vol. Oxford guides to Chaucer. Clarendon.
D’Arcens, L. (Ed.). (2016). The Cambridge companion to medievalism: Vol. Cambridge companions to culture. Cambridge University Press.
Emery, E., & Utz, R. J. (Eds.). (2017). Medievalism: key critical terms: Vol. Medievalism. D.S. Brewer.
Goldie, M. B. (2003). Middle English literature: an historical sourcebook. Blackwell.
Greenlaw, L. (2015). A double sorrow: Troilus and Criseyde. Faber & Faber. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780571284566
Holsinger, B. W. (2014). A burnable book. Harper.
Justice, S. (1994). Insurgency Remembered. In Writing and rebellion: England in 1381 (pp. 193–254). University of California Press.
Lerer, S. (2008). The Yale companion to Chaucer. Yale University Press.
Matthews, D. (2017). Medievalism: a critical history. D.S. Brewer.
Miller, R. P. (1977). Chaucer: sources and backgrounds. Oxford University Press.
Minnis, A. J. (1988). Medieval theory of authorship: scholastic literary attitudes in the later Middle Ages (2nd ed). Wildwood House.
Patterson, L. (2006). ‘What man artow?’: authorial self-definition in The Tale of Sir Thopas and The Tale of Melibee. In Temporal Circumstances: Form and History in the Canterbury Tales (pp. 97–128). Palgrave.
Paul Strohm. (2000). Chaucer’s Troilus as Temporal Archive. In Theory and the Premodern Text (pp. 80–96). University of Minnesota Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ABER/reader.action?docID=310523&ppg=66
Pugh, T., & Weisl, A. J. (2013). Medievalisms: making the past in the present. Routledge.
Scala, E. (2016). Desire in the Canterbury Tales: Vol. Interventions: New Studies Medieval Cult. Ohio State University Press.
Trigg, S. (2016). Medievalism and Theories of Temporality. In L. Darcens (Ed.), Cambridge Companion to Medievalism (pp. 196–209). Cambridge University Press.
Turner, M. (2007). Chaucerian conflict: languages of antagonism in late fourteenth-century London. Clarendon. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3586452850002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
Turner, M. (Ed.). (2013). A handbook of Middle English studies: Vol. Wiley-Blackwell critical theory handbooks. Wiley-Blackwell. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=2422473300002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
Windeatt, B. A. (1992). Oxford guides to Chaucer: Troilus and Criseyde: Vol. Oxford guides to Chaucer. Clarendon Press.