[1]
P. Agbabi and G. Chaucer, Telling tales. Edinburgh: Canongate, 2015.
[2]
G. Chaucer and L. D. Benson, The riverside Chaucer, 3rd ed. [with a new foreword by Christopher Cannon]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
[3]
L. Greenlaw, A double sorrow: Troilus and Criseyde. London: Faber & Faber, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780571284566
[4]
S. Ali, Refugee Tales. [Place of publication not identified]: Comma Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&accId=8661456&isbn=9781910974636
[5]
B. W. Holsinger, A burnable book. London: Harper, 2014.
[6]
S. Trigg, ‘Medievalism and Theories of Temporality’, in Cambridge Companion to Medievalism, L. Darcens, Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 196–209.
[7]
S. Justice, ‘Insurgency Remembered’, in Writing and rebellion: England in 1381, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994, pp. 193–254.
[8]
L. Patterson, ‘“What man artow?”: authorial self-definition in The Tale of Sir Thopas and The Tale of Melibee.’, in Temporal Circumstances: Form and History in the Canterbury Tales, Palgrave, 2006, pp. 97–128.
[9]
Paul Strohm, ‘Chaucer’s Troilus as Temporal Archive’, in Theory and the Premodern Text, University of Minnesota Press, 2000, pp. 80–96 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ABER/reader.action?docID=310523&ppg=66
[10]
Barrington, Candace; Hsy, Jonathan., ‘Remediated verse: Chaucer’s Tale of Melibee and Patience Agbabi’s “Unfinished Business”’, Postmedieval, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 136–145, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://literature.proquest.com/searchFulltext.do?id=R05521248&divLevel=0&area=abell&forward=critref_ft
[11]
M. Turner, Ed., A handbook of Middle English studies, vol. Wiley-Blackwell critical theory handbooks. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=2422473300002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
[12]
A. Butterfield, Familiar Enemy: Chaucer, Language, and Nation in the Hundred Years War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=2460386370002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
[13]
H. Cooper, The Canterbury tales, vol. Oxford guides to Chaucer. Oxford: Clarendon, 1989.
[14]
L. D’Arcens, Ed., The Cambridge companion to medievalism, vol. Cambridge companions to culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
[15]
M. B. Goldie, Middle English literature: an historical sourcebook. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.
[16]
S. Lerer, The Yale companion to Chaucer. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press, 2008.
[17]
D. Matthews, Medievalism: a critical history. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2017.
[18]
R. P. Miller, Chaucer: sources and backgrounds. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.
[19]
A. J. Minnis, Medieval theory of authorship: scholastic literary attitudes in the later Middle Ages, 2nd ed. Aldershot: Wildwood House, 1988.
[20]
E. Emery and R. J. Utz, Eds., Medievalism: key critical terms, vol. Medievalism. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2017.
[21]
T. Pugh and A. J. Weisl, Medievalisms: making the past in the present. London: Routledge, 2013.
[22]
E. Scala, Desire in the Canterbury Tales, vol. Interventions: New Studies Medieval Cult. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 2016.
[23]
M. Turner, Chaucerian conflict: languages of antagonism in late fourteenth-century London. Oxford: Clarendon, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3586452850002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
[24]
B. A. Windeatt, Oxford guides to Chaucer: Troilus and Criseyde, vol. Oxford guides to Chaucer. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.