1
Agbabi P, Chaucer G. Telling tales. Edinburgh: : Canongate 2015.
2
Chaucer G, Benson LD. The riverside Chaucer. 3rd ed. [with a new foreword by Christopher Cannon]. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008.
3
Greenlaw L. A double sorrow: Troilus and Criseyde. London: : Faber & Faber 2015. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780571284566
4
Ali S. Refugee Tales. [Place of publication not identified]: : Comma Press 2016. https://www.vlebooks.com/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&accId=8661456&isbn=9781910974636
5
Holsinger BW. A burnable book. London: : Harper 2014.
6
Trigg S. Medievalism and Theories of Temporality. In: Darcens L, ed. Cambridge Companion to Medievalism. Cambridge University Press 2016. 196–209.
7
Justice S. Insurgency Remembered. In: Writing and rebellion: England in 1381. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1994. 193–254.
8
Patterson L. ‘What man artow?’: authorial self-definition in The Tale of Sir Thopas and The Tale of Melibee. In: Temporal Circumstances: Form and History in the Canterbury Tales. Palgrave 2006. 97–128.
9
Paul Strohm. Chaucer’s Troilus as Temporal Archive. In: Theory and the Premodern Text. University of Minnesota Press 2000. 80–96.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ABER/reader.action?docID=310523&ppg=66
10
Barrington, Candace; Hsy, Jonathan. Remediated verse: Chaucer’s Tale of Melibee and Patience Agbabi’s ‘Unfinished Business’. Postmedieval 2015;6:136–45.https://literature.proquest.com/searchFulltext.do?id=R05521248&divLevel=0&area=abell&forward=critref_ft
11
Turner M, editor. A handbook of Middle English studies. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2013. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=2422473300002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
12
Butterfield A. Familiar Enemy: Chaucer, Language, and Nation in the Hundred Years War. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=2460386370002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
13
Cooper H. The Canterbury tales. Oxford: : Clarendon 1989.
14
D’Arcens L, editor. The Cambridge companion to medievalism. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2016.
15
Goldie MB. Middle English literature: an historical sourcebook. Oxford: : Blackwell 2003.
16
Lerer S. The Yale companion to Chaucer. New Haven, Conn: : Yale University Press 2008.
17
Matthews D. Medievalism: a critical history. Cambridge: : D.S. Brewer 2017.
18
Miller RP. Chaucer: sources and backgrounds. New York: : Oxford University Press 1977.
19
Minnis AJ. Medieval theory of authorship: scholastic literary attitudes in the later Middle Ages. 2nd ed. Aldershot: : Wildwood House 1988.
20
Emery E, Utz RJ, editors. Medievalism: key critical terms. Cambridge: : D.S. Brewer 2017.
21
Pugh T, Weisl AJ. Medievalisms: making the past in the present. London: : Routledge 2013.
22
Scala E. Desire in the Canterbury Tales. Columbus, OH: : Ohio State University Press 2016.
23
Turner M. Chaucerian conflict: languages of antagonism in late fourteenth-century London. Oxford: : Clarendon 2007. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3586452850002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
24
Windeatt BA. Oxford guides to Chaucer: Troilus and Criseyde. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1992.