1.
Agbabi P, Chaucer G. Telling tales. Edinburgh: Canongate; 2015.
2.
Chaucer G, Benson LD. The riverside Chaucer. 3rd ed. [with a new foreword by Christopher Cannon]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
3.
Greenlaw L. A double sorrow: Troilus and Criseyde [Internet]. London: Faber & Faber; 2015. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&isbn=9780571284566
4.
Ali S. Refugee Tales [Internet]. [Place of publication not identified]: Comma Press; 2016. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/product/openreader?id=AberystUni&accId=8661456&isbn=9781910974636
5.
Holsinger BW. A burnable book. London: Harper; 2014.
6.
Trigg S. Medievalism and Theories of Temporality. In: Darcens L, editor. Cambridge Companion to Medievalism. Cambridge University Press; 2016. p. 196–209.
7.
Justice S. Insurgency Remembered. Writing and rebellion: England in 1381. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1994. p. 193–254.
8.
Patterson L. ‘What man artow?’: authorial self-definition in The Tale of Sir Thopas and The Tale of Melibee. Temporal Circumstances: Form and History in the Canterbury Tales. Palgrave; 2006. p. 97–128.
9.
Paul Strohm. Chaucer’s Troilus as Temporal Archive. Theory and the Premodern Text [Internet]. University of Minnesota Press; 2000. p. 80–96. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ABER/reader.action?docID=310523&ppg=66
10.
Barrington, Candace; Hsy, Jonathan. Remediated verse: Chaucer’s Tale of Melibee and Patience Agbabi’s ‘Unfinished Business’. Postmedieval [Internet]. 2015;6(2):136–145. Available from: https://literature.proquest.com/searchFulltext.do?id=R05521248&divLevel=0&area=abell&forward=critref_ft
11.
Turner M, editor. A handbook of Middle English studies [Internet]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. Available from: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=2422473300002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
12.
Butterfield A. Familiar Enemy: Chaucer, Language, and Nation in the Hundred Years War [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=2460386370002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
13.
Cooper H. The Canterbury tales. Oxford: Clarendon; 1989.
14.
D’Arcens L, editor. The Cambridge companion to medievalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016.
15.
Goldie MB. Middle English literature: an historical sourcebook. Oxford: Blackwell; 2003.
16.
Lerer S. The Yale companion to Chaucer. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 2008.
17.
Matthews D. Medievalism: a critical history. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer; 2017.
18.
Miller RP. Chaucer: sources and backgrounds. New York: Oxford University Press; 1977.
19.
Minnis AJ. Medieval theory of authorship: scholastic literary attitudes in the later Middle Ages. 2nd ed. Aldershot: Wildwood House; 1988.
20.
Emery E, Utz RJ, editors. Medievalism: key critical terms. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer; 2017.
21.
Pugh T, Weisl AJ. Medievalisms: making the past in the present. London: Routledge; 2013.
22.
Scala E. Desire in the Canterbury Tales. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press; 2016.
23.
Turner M. Chaucerian conflict: languages of antagonism in late fourteenth-century London [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon; 2007. Available from: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3586452850002418&institutionId=2418&customerId=2415
24.
Windeatt BA. Oxford guides to Chaucer: Troilus and Criseyde. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1992.