[1]
Agbabi, P. and Chaucer, G. 2015. Telling tales. Canongate.
[2]
Ali, S. 2016. Refugee Tales. Comma Press.
[3]
Barrington, Candace; Hsy, Jonathan. 2015. Remediated verse: Chaucer’s Tale of Melibee and Patience Agbabi’s ‘Unfinished Business’. Postmedieval. 6, 2 (2015), 136–145.
[4]
Butterfield, A. 2009. Familiar Enemy: Chaucer, Language, and Nation in the Hundred Years War. Oxford University Press.
[5]
Chaucer, G. and Benson, L.D. 2008. The riverside Chaucer. Oxford University Press.
[6]
Cooper, H. 1989. The Canterbury tales. Clarendon.
[7]
D’Arcens, L. ed. 2016. The Cambridge companion to medievalism. Cambridge University Press.
[8]
Emery, E. and Utz, R.J. eds 2017. Medievalism: key critical terms. D.S. Brewer.
[9]
Goldie, M.B. 2003. Middle English literature: an historical sourcebook. Blackwell.
[10]
Greenlaw, L. 2015. A double sorrow: Troilus and Criseyde. Faber & Faber.
[11]
Holsinger, B.W. 2014. A burnable book. Harper.
[12]
Justice, S. 1994. Insurgency Remembered. Writing and rebellion: England in 1381. University of California Press. 193–254.
[13]
Lerer, S. 2008. The Yale companion to Chaucer. Yale University Press.
[14]
Matthews, D. 2017. Medievalism: a critical history. D.S. Brewer.
[15]
Miller, R.P. 1977. Chaucer: sources and backgrounds. Oxford University Press.
[16]
Minnis, A.J. 1988. Medieval theory of authorship: scholastic literary attitudes in the later Middle Ages. Wildwood House.
[17]
Patterson, L. 2006. ‘What man artow?’: authorial self-definition in The Tale of Sir Thopas and The Tale of Melibee. Temporal Circumstances: Form and History in the Canterbury Tales. Palgrave. 97–128.
[18]
Paul Strohm 2000. Chaucer’s Troilus as Temporal Archive. Theory and the Premodern Text. University of Minnesota Press. 80–96.
[19]
Pugh, T. and Weisl, A.J. 2013. Medievalisms: making the past in the present. Routledge.
[20]
Scala, E. 2016. Desire in the Canterbury Tales. Ohio State University Press.
[21]
Trigg, S. 2016. Medievalism and Theories of Temporality. Cambridge Companion to Medievalism. L. Darcens, ed. Cambridge University Press. 196–209.
[22]
Turner, M. ed. 2013. A handbook of Middle English studies. Wiley-Blackwell.
[23]
Turner, M. 2007. Chaucerian conflict: languages of antagonism in late fourteenth-century London. Clarendon.
[24]
Windeatt, B.A. 1992. Oxford guides to Chaucer: Troilus and Criseyde. Clarendon Press.